Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
UKers to vote only please (more accurately, the mugs who pay for the monarchy), comments open to all.
Not talking about any individuals - they may be very nice people (who we wouldn't be talking about if they weren't part of the royal family) - but the concept/institution of monarchy.
Not talking about any individuals - they may be very nice people (who we wouldn't be talking about if they weren't part of the royal family) - but the concept/institution of monarchy.
- KeithPratt
- Arsehole all Erect
- Posts: 23901
- Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
- Contact:
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
This is too binary.
The notion of a Monarch in today's democratic world is absurd. But in countries that have complex histories where the dialogue between institutions plays a tremendously important part in the political process, such as the constitutional monarchy of the UK, the question becomes more complex.
People have tried over the last few hundred years or so to remove their monarchs, but the evidence across the world for a peaceful transition is pretty dismal. It usually ends in catastrophic levels of blood.
Britain offers an example of a monarchy that provides a powerful symbol of living history whilst being politically benign. We had our civil war on this subject nearly 400 years ago and sorted the main issues out. The Monarchy as an institution I suspect will continue to grow smaller and smaller, perhaps even more quickly once the Queen dies.
Provide a solution on how to end the institution of the monarchy and successfully resolve the constitutional and political processes that it would involve for all parties concerned and we can proceed.
The notion of a Monarch in today's democratic world is absurd. But in countries that have complex histories where the dialogue between institutions plays a tremendously important part in the political process, such as the constitutional monarchy of the UK, the question becomes more complex.
People have tried over the last few hundred years or so to remove their monarchs, but the evidence across the world for a peaceful transition is pretty dismal. It usually ends in catastrophic levels of blood.
Britain offers an example of a monarchy that provides a powerful symbol of living history whilst being politically benign. We had our civil war on this subject nearly 400 years ago and sorted the main issues out. The Monarchy as an institution I suspect will continue to grow smaller and smaller, perhaps even more quickly once the Queen dies.
Provide a solution on how to end the institution of the monarchy and successfully resolve the constitutional and political processes that it would involve for all parties concerned and we can proceed.
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
'Yes or No' is binary. 'Just a bit' counts as 'yes'.
On the 'yes' option I said "personally important to me" because I want personal votes, no votes to include "well it matters for others".
Perhaps I should have included "I don't want them but I'm just a contrarian". But I didn't.
The monarch in this country has no active constitutional role. The very term is redundant.
How people in the past and elsewhere rid themselves of monarchy is irrelevant.
You say so. Others may say so. I disagree. I also think we don't need it even if they were.
Benign? Why not radiantly graceful .. majestic even.
Anyway, they're politically irrelevant.
Ah yes. I was a roundhead back then.
That's a relief.
Why? I'm only asking for people's opinion on the board as to whether the monarchy is wanted for itself.
That said, it could be done.
On the 'yes' option I said "personally important to me" because I want personal votes, no votes to include "well it matters for others".
Perhaps I should have included "I don't want them but I'm just a contrarian". But I didn't.
The monarch in this country has no active constitutional role. The very term is redundant.
How people in the past and elsewhere rid themselves of monarchy is irrelevant.
Britain offers an example of a monarchy that provides a powerful symbol of living history
You say so. Others may say so. I disagree. I also think we don't need it even if they were.
whilst being politically benign.
Benign? Why not radiantly graceful .. majestic even.
Anyway, they're politically irrelevant.
We had our civil war on this subject nearly 400 years ago
Ah yes. I was a roundhead back then.
and sorted the main issues out
That's a relief.
Provide a solution on how to end the institution of the monarchy and successfully resolve the constitutional and political processes that it would involve for all parties concerned and we can proceed.
Why? I'm only asking for people's opinion on the board as to whether the monarchy is wanted for itself.
That said, it could be done.
- KeithPratt
- Arsehole all Erect
- Posts: 23901
- Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
- Contact:
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
German Dave wrote:Toby wrote:
People have tried over the last few hundred years or so to remove their monarchs, but the evidence across the world for a peaceful transition is pretty dismal. It usually ends in catastrophic levels of blood.
What, as opposed to imperialism and capitalism?
It is easy to talk about the removal of an existing political system when we have lived, for the most part, peaceful lives. But the evidence for the removal of monarchies, particularly in Europe, isn't particularly great. France and Spain in particular are moot points.
Republics such as France engaged in murderous colonial practices, America continued the institution of slavery as a Republic for nearly a century after it was created and Communism killed millions of people in the 20th century whilst keeping slavery going through the Gulag system, so I'm not really sure what your point is about imperialism and capitalism.
-
- Posts: 63926
- Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
I think you guys should make me king.
No more soccer. Only basketball.
No more chips and scraps. Only corn dogs.
No Randy Newman. Only Kraftwerk.
You'll thank me later.
You'll see. . .
No more soccer. Only basketball.
No more chips and scraps. Only corn dogs.
No Randy Newman. Only Kraftwerk.
You'll thank me later.
You'll see. . .
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!
-
- Dribbling idiot airhead
- Posts: 19645
- Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
Forgive my ignorance on the details I just learned that the House of Lords is no longer a body of life-long appointed landed barons and dukes but is a now body of supposedly neutral, apolitical advisors. Or something. That seems like a big step toward if not eliminating royal power then diminishing it.
Question authority.
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7901
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
Jimbo wrote:Forgive my ignorance on the details I just learned that the House of Lords is no longer a body of life-long appointed landed barons and dukes but is a now body of supposedly neutral, apolitical advisors. Or something. That seems like a big step toward if not eliminating royal power then diminishing it.
Nah, it's still largely party political, plus all the aristocracy, bishops, and early retirement bloated former MPs who still require access to the private bars of Westminster, and thus get peerages for their work in creating the need for food banks.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7901
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
But on the plus side, I do think that Prince Harry had performed a genuine personal sacrifice by marrying Ms Merkel for the good of European unity.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
- Penk!
- Midnight to Six Man
- Posts: 35784
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
- Location: Stockholm
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
He just wants German citizenship so he can skip the queues at airports.
fange wrote:One of the things i really dislike in this life is people raising their voices in German.
- Diamond Dog
- "Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
- Posts: 69578
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
- Location: High On Poachers Hill
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
PENK wrote:He just wants German citizenship so he can skip the queues at airports.
I'd have thought him retaining German citizenship would be less than problematic.
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine
Cocaine
- Penk!
- Midnight to Six Man
- Posts: 35784
- Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
- Location: Stockholm
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
fange wrote:One of the things i really dislike in this life is people raising their voices in German.
- Geezee
- Posts: 12802
- Joined: 24 Jul 2003, 10:14
- Location: Where joy divides into vision
- Geezee
- Posts: 12802
- Joined: 24 Jul 2003, 10:14
- Location: Where joy divides into vision
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
Diamond Dog wrote:PENK wrote:He just wants German citizenship so he can skip the queues at airports.
I'd have thought him retaining German citizenship would be less than problematic.
Smilies are ON
Flash is OFF
Url is ON
Flash is OFF
Url is ON
- Goat Boy
- Bogarting the joint
- Posts: 32974
- Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
- Location: In the perfumed garden
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
I think people believe that the Queen has put a real shift in, a lifetimes public service, that sorta thing. I get that. I think she does take the role very seriously and I respect her for that.
I don’t think Charles is particularly liked but then William and Harry are. I think there’s a not insignificant amount of public good will towards them, in part because of their mother and her death of course but they’ve also conducted themselves pretty well. I don’t consider that much of an achievement mind but it’s all about appearances.
I’ve always been a republican and still believe that as a matter of principle we should ditch them. Over the years my ire has died down a bit as I mellow. It also doesn’t seem as important to me as it once did simply because there’s so much other shit going down at the moment. That doesn’t mean I don’t tell ‘em to “fuck off” when I see ‘em on the telly mind. I stumbled upon some show on the Beeb on the anniversary of Elizabeth and Philips wedding and was nauseated by the arse licking. That still angers me.
I would love to think that one day they would simply fade away but it could take decades. One thing Brexit has shown is that in an increasingly global world the pull of old fashioned national identity is still there and it’s still powerful. The Royal Family, like it or not, are part of British national identity but a diminished one I think. Once certain generations die off their relevance will become even less but they will still maintain some allure as part of the celebrity world.
I can see a slow death I guess. One where they just fizzle out. But I can also see peoples apathy and tolerance keeping them there too. Part of me would still like to see Charlies head on a stick. Another part of me is resigned to their continued and possibly permanent existence.
I don’t think Charles is particularly liked but then William and Harry are. I think there’s a not insignificant amount of public good will towards them, in part because of their mother and her death of course but they’ve also conducted themselves pretty well. I don’t consider that much of an achievement mind but it’s all about appearances.
I’ve always been a republican and still believe that as a matter of principle we should ditch them. Over the years my ire has died down a bit as I mellow. It also doesn’t seem as important to me as it once did simply because there’s so much other shit going down at the moment. That doesn’t mean I don’t tell ‘em to “fuck off” when I see ‘em on the telly mind. I stumbled upon some show on the Beeb on the anniversary of Elizabeth and Philips wedding and was nauseated by the arse licking. That still angers me.
I would love to think that one day they would simply fade away but it could take decades. One thing Brexit has shown is that in an increasingly global world the pull of old fashioned national identity is still there and it’s still powerful. The Royal Family, like it or not, are part of British national identity but a diminished one I think. Once certain generations die off their relevance will become even less but they will still maintain some allure as part of the celebrity world.
I can see a slow death I guess. One where they just fizzle out. But I can also see peoples apathy and tolerance keeping them there too. Part of me would still like to see Charlies head on a stick. Another part of me is resigned to their continued and possibly permanent existence.
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.
Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism
- The Modernist
- 2018 BCB Cup Champ!
- Posts: 13873
- Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
We've had the debate on here before and I've not been persuaded by any of the arguments for their retention. The principle of what they represent is just wrong in a modern democracy in my view. At the same time I don't expect them to go in my lifetime, quite the opposite, I think Harry and William and their various spouses and children will bring in a new wave of popularity.
- never/ever
- Posts: 26482
- Joined: 27 Jun 2008, 14:21
- Location: Journeying through a burning brain
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
Only UK?
Liz rules Australia/New Zealand too.
Plus I share a monarch with Frank too- so I perhaps pay double.....
Liz rules Australia/New Zealand too.
Plus I share a monarch with Frank too- so I perhaps pay double.....
kath wrote:i do not wanna buy the world a fucquin gotdamn coke.
- Diamond Dog
- "Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
- Posts: 69578
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
- Location: High On Poachers Hill
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
The people that say "They're doing a great job" etc - how is that quantifiable?
I've never understood how, in the 21st century, we have this anachronism from the dark ages. It's all a complete and utter nonsense and I am never less than completely baffled that otherwise sane/sensible people go all weak at the knees and start drooling feverishly when the Monarchy is mentioned - it's incomprehensible.
Get rid of them. Tomorrow. By the weekend, no one will remember what they did or why they were still in place. More importantly, no one will miss their 'function' one single iota. Not once.
I've never understood how, in the 21st century, we have this anachronism from the dark ages. It's all a complete and utter nonsense and I am never less than completely baffled that otherwise sane/sensible people go all weak at the knees and start drooling feverishly when the Monarchy is mentioned - it's incomprehensible.
Get rid of them. Tomorrow. By the weekend, no one will remember what they did or why they were still in place. More importantly, no one will miss their 'function' one single iota. Not once.
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine
Cocaine
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
never/ever wrote:Only UK?
Liz rules Australia/New Zealand too.
Plus I share a monarch with Frank too- so I perhaps pay double.....
Interesting point - I'd be interested in knowing how much non-UK tax payers cough up for the so-called aristocracy.
I'm also wondering who the second person who voted 'yes' was. Admins ..??
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7901
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
Thang-y wrote:I'm also wondering who the second person who voted 'yes' was. Admins ..??
Yeah, it must've been the admins, they definitely don't believe in democracy either. Bastards.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
- Andrews Sisters Conundrum
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20345
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?
Diamond Dog wrote:The people that say "They're doing a great job" etc - how is that quantifiable?
I've never understood how, in the 21st century, we have this anachronism from the dark ages. It's all a complete and utter nonsense and I am never less than completely baffled that otherwise sane/sensible people go all weak at the knees and start drooling feverishly when the Monarchy is mentioned - it's incomprehensible.
Get rid of them. Tomorrow. By the weekend, no one will remember what they did or why they were still in place. More importantly, no one will miss their 'function' one single iota. Not once.
I was reading through the thread thinking how great it was that no-one had trotted out the same naive, adolescent viewpoints (altho' Griff came pretty close) and then THIS cobblers!
Mind, once the Queen dies, I really don't know what to expect.
GoogaMooga wrote:Beefheart is the done thing among the cognoscenti. Middle of the Road is taking risks in that context.