Fave 70's "New Hollywood" director

..and why not?

Fave 70's 'new hollywood' director

Hal Ashby
3
9%
Brian De Palma
0
No votes
Arthur Penn
1
3%
Roman Polanski
3
9%
Martin Scorsese
14
41%
Robert Altman
4
12%
Bob Rafaelson
0
No votes
Terrence Malick
3
9%
Francis Ford Coppola
5
15%
Michael Cimeno
1
3%
 
Total votes: 34

User avatar
The Write Profile
2017 BCB Cup Champ
Posts: 14755
Joined: 15 Sep 2003, 10:55
Location: Today, Tomorrow, Timaru
Contact:

Postby The Write Profile » 06 Oct 2005, 09:43

Far be it from me to revive this thread once more, but following the well-received forays into documentary for Scorsese (No Direction Home & the Blues), does anyone think he might achieve greater success in that environment now, artistically and (perhaps) commercially. It certainly wouldn't be the first time a wellregarded director has made the transition for fulltime: Herzog's wildlife documentaries (most notably Grizzly Man, which I really want to see) have all been as interesting and strangely obsessive (if slightly more lowkey) as his earlier feature work. And of course, there is Wim Wenders, whose best film in the last 10 years was probably Beuna Vista Social Club.

Or is this theory a bit too frivolous?
It's before my time but I've been told, he never came back from Karangahape Road.

The Modernist

Postby The Modernist » 26 Feb 2006, 00:42

The Right Summery Profile wrote:Far be it from me to revive this thread once more, but following the well-received forays into documentary for Scorsese (No Direction Home & the Blues), does anyone think he might achieve greater success in that environment now, artistically and (perhaps) commercially. It certainly wouldn't be the first time a wellregarded director has made the transition for fulltime: Herzog's wildlife documentaries (most notably Grizzly Man, which I really want to see) have all been as interesting and strangely obsessive (if slightly more lowkey) as his earlier feature work. And of course, there is Wim Wenders, whose best film in the last 10 years was probably Beuna Vista Social Club.

Or is this theory a bit too frivolous?


These documentaries haven't been particularly gorund-breaking though. They're safe projects in a way.

The Modernist

Postby The Modernist » 26 Feb 2006, 00:43

The Right Summery Profile wrote:Far be it from me to revive this thread once more, but following the well-received forays into documentary for Scorsese (No Direction Home & the Blues), does anyone think he might achieve greater success in that environment now, artistically and (perhaps) commercially. It certainly wouldn't be the first time a wellregarded director has made the transition for fulltime: Herzog's wildlife documentaries (most notably Grizzly Man, which I really want to see) have all been as interesting and strangely obsessive (if slightly more lowkey) as his earlier feature work. And of course, there is Wim Wenders, whose best film in the last 10 years was probably Beuna Vista Social Club.

Or is this theory a bit too frivolous?


These documentaries haven't been particularly gorund-breaking though. They're safe projects in a way.

User avatar
The Write Profile
2017 BCB Cup Champ
Posts: 14755
Joined: 15 Sep 2003, 10:55
Location: Today, Tomorrow, Timaru
Contact:

Postby The Write Profile » 26 Feb 2006, 00:48

El Modernista wrote:
These documentaries haven't been particularly gorund-breaking though. They're safe projects in a way.


Have you seen Grizzly Man, out of curiosity? If anything it's closer to the stuff that Herzog did with Kisinki in terms of its themes and the sheer obsessiveness of the subject (and the director, it has to be said) than say, Scorsese's approach to his docos, which admittedly is safe. Actually Scorsese's job was already halfdone by Pennenbaker anyway, although he did do very well in putting the footage altogether. The Herzog docos are a different kettle of fish entirely, mind.

I do think that would be a better venue for the guy's talents now though, the Aviator showed how tired his filmmaking has become. Slick, solid, well performed, sure, but I can't help but feel that there's a better, nastier film about Howard Hughes to be made.

James Ellroy's American Tabloid really needs to be adapted, it's a vicious, criss-crossing bastard of a novel, taking onboard, the Kennedy family, Hoover, the CIA, Jimmy Hoffa and the Teamsters, Hughes, the LAPD, and the criminal underworld in etween. You'd have to streamline it to hell, and get the right actors for the jo (Roert Downey Jr would make a great Kemper Boyd), but there's an hand grenade of an adaptation to be done.
It's before my time but I've been told, he never came back from Karangahape Road.

User avatar
Muskrat
World's Foremost Authority
Posts: 21397
Joined: 17 Jul 2003, 01:05
Location: Next to the park; across the street from the college; and the freeway at my back
Contact:

Postby Muskrat » 26 Feb 2006, 06:48

El Penk en el Ojo wrote:Michael Cimino may have directed The Deer Hunter, which in my opinion is as close as anything to the greatest film of all time, but, let's be honest here, he did fuck all else. Likewise, while Scorsese did make a couple of great films in the 70s, there's also some of his work which does nothing for me.
For me, Coppola is the only one on the list who made nothing but great films in the 70s.


I concur on every point. There isn't one of those directors, save Coppola, whose work I look (or looked) forward to seeing. For that reason, I haven't seen everything every one of those directors...directed, but I don't think I'm missing anything based on what I have seen and read.

I go back and forth on Spielberg, for that matter, but always have admired his craft. I enjoy hearing Scorsese discussing film so much, it's especially disappointing to me that I'm not knocked out more by his films I've seen -- though I liked Taxi Driver and King of Comedy OK, I've no intrest in seeing them again.
'
Altman just pisses me off, he's so full of himself.

I'd be vaguely interested in seeing Heaven's Gate, though. The only time I saw it was the long version, when it first opened. I recall liking it more than the studio evidently did!

Does Walter Hill qualify? He probably came along a bit later (I'm not looking him up for thisl; just musing).
Things that a fella can't forget...

Lord Rother wrote: I’m with Googs.

User avatar
The Write Profile
2017 BCB Cup Champ
Posts: 14755
Joined: 15 Sep 2003, 10:55
Location: Today, Tomorrow, Timaru
Contact:

Postby The Write Profile » 25 Aug 2006, 00:06

Actually, looking back at the thread, I was curious that one particular point hasn't been raised. Namely, which director has come out of that period with their dignity and some artistic merit intact. I would suppose that Robert Altman is the most consistent out of them, though if I'm perfectly honest, I'm finding his multiple-essemble increasingly mannered and unbelievable. That said, I'll probably see A Praire Home Companion, even if it is going to be a merely minor picture alongside former towering heights of Nashville, etc.

Actually, Herzog--though having absolutely nothing to do with them--is probably more fascinating than any of the former "New Hollywood" directors now. His documentaries, intentionally or otherwise, seem to continue his explorations into the minds of deeply obsessive and conflicted people- there's something about Grizzly Man's self-examination which is both frightening and quite liberating. That its subject was something of a basket case made things interesting, too.

That said, I am interested in De Palma's adaptation of the Black Dhalia, if only because I'm a huge fan of James Elroy. American Tabloid is the better book, mind.
It's before my time but I've been told, he never came back from Karangahape Road.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 25 Aug 2006, 00:21

Baron wrote:I actually enjoy the more recent Altman more than what I've seen from the seventies


Well, that was a stupid thing to say.

It's now tied for me between Malick and Altman.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

The Modernist

Postby The Modernist » 25 Aug 2006, 00:21

Talking of maverick directors, it was in the news this week that Monte Hellman's oddball classic The Cockfighter starring Warren Oates has been permanently banned in Britain because of some animal rights legislation.
It's absurd, the film's over 40 years old. Are they going to ban John Ford westerns next because of cruelty to horses.

Bungo the Mungo

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 25 Aug 2006, 00:23

The Unique Modernist! wrote:Talking of maverick directors, it was in the news this week that Monte Hellman's oddball classic The Cockfighter starring Warren Oates has been permanently banned in Britain because of some animal rights legislation.
It's absurd, the film's over 40 years old. Are they going to ban John Ford westerns next because of cruelty to horses.


I swear to God it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they did.

The Modernist

Postby The Modernist » 25 Aug 2006, 00:24

Baron wrote:
Baron wrote:I actually enjoy the more recent Altman more than what I've seen from the seventies


Well, that was a stupid thing to say.

It's now tied for me between Malick and Altman.


Malick's been very astute in keeping his legacy in tact by not doing anything! :)
I find him a fascinating guy, I think we're due a new one sometime in the next few years.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 25 Aug 2006, 00:25

The Unique Modernist! wrote:
Baron wrote:
Baron wrote:I actually enjoy the more recent Altman more than what I've seen from the seventies


Well, that was a stupid thing to say.

It's now tied for me between Malick and Altman.


Malick's been very astute in keeping his legacy in tact by not doing anything! :)
I find him a fascinating guy, I think we're due a new one sometime in the next few years.


I thought one just came out. Or got shelved or something.
yet another genius from Texas
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

Sneelock

Postby Sneelock » 25 Aug 2006, 00:29

his Pocohantas movie?
that's on my pay per view now.
I plan to see it but it's gonna be tough for me to watch on t.v.
I usually make an effort to see his movies on a big screen but I guess I'm not trying as hard.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 25 Aug 2006, 00:31

Son of Schmeelock wrote:his Pocohantas movie?
that's on my pay per view now.
I plan to see it but it's gonna be tough for me to watch on t.v.
I usually make an effort to see his movies on a big screen but I guess I'm not trying as hard.


Yeah. The New World.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

Sneelock

Postby Sneelock » 25 Aug 2006, 00:31

oh, and I think a LOT of Altman's more current stuff stands pretty tall in his body of work. 'short cuts' easily. the player, probably. hell, I even saw 'Kansas City' more than a couple times.

seemed like somebody should.

The Modernist

Postby The Modernist » 25 Aug 2006, 01:50

What happened? I can't believe a new Malick movie couldn't get a distribution deal.

Sneelock

Postby Sneelock » 25 Aug 2006, 02:04

I think they just didn't open it very wide.
I don't think the reviews were all that good.
it showed out here in an 'art house' for the blink of an eye.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 25 Aug 2006, 02:12

The Unique Modernist! wrote:What happened? I can't believe a new Malick movie couldn't get a distribution deal.


Here's a preview of a story that you'll have to subscribe to Texas Monthly to read.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 25 Aug 2006, 02:13

[quote="Cédric"]

Bastard still has more posts than me. Damn!
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

Sneelock

Postby Sneelock » 25 Aug 2006, 02:19

see, now I wish I hadn't read that. now I might need to wait for a DVD.
or a personal screening. or hell to freeze over.

I knew a fancy-pants writer and his fancy-pants wife who got to go to a screening of a 4 hour version of 'thin red line'. they, of course, said that simply everybody thought it was simply dreadful but they were just too motherfucking polite to get up and walk out.

I told them I'd like to see it and they both snorted out of their noses like horses.
something tells me his distributor did something like that.


Return to “Screenadelica”