Page 1 of 1
Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 05 Sep 2021, 18:10
by naughty boy
Emerson Lake and Palmer
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 05 Sep 2021, 19:11
by GoogaMooga
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 05 Sep 2021, 19:27
by mudshark
REO Speedwagon
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 05 Sep 2021, 21:04
by John_K
Foo Fighters...
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 05 Sep 2021, 22:06
by ChrisB
I'll save Foo Fighters and give you Bon Jovi or Whitesnake. Sod it, you can have them both
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 06 Sep 2021, 00:01
by Charlie O.
This could easily make 800 pages.
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 06 Sep 2021, 01:20
by John_K
slightbreeze wrote:I'll save Foo Fighters and give you Bon Jovi or Whitesnake. Sod it, you can have them both
I'll confine the three of them to Hell, and toss the Chilli Peppers in with them...
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 06 Sep 2021, 05:45
by trans-chigley express
Charlie O. wrote:This could easily make 800 pages.
full of bands we just don't like
Re: Bands who should only have released no albums
Posted: 06 Sep 2021, 07:46
by robertff
trans-chigley express wrote:Charlie O. wrote:This could easily make 800 pages.
full of bands we just don't like
Yes, and the point is...................?
.