Bands who should only have released one album

Do talk back
User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 3527
Joined: 02 Jun 2008, 12:43
Location: The north side of my town faces east, and the east faces south

Re: Bands who should only have released one album

Postby Rorschach » 08 Sep 2021, 13:42

der Freiherr wrote:
Well I think The Rolling Stones should have been a singles band until, maybe, Between the Buttons, so it’s ok.


Totally agree with that.
Bugger off.

User avatar
der Freiherr
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 44750
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: Bands who should only have released one album

Postby der Freiherr » 08 Sep 2021, 14:03

I had a look at the discography and I meant Aftermath, of course.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
pcqgod
Posts: 18745
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 07:23
Location: Ohio

Re: Bands who should only have released one album

Postby pcqgod » 14 Sep 2021, 06:47

Thinking about this further, I think the best answer is Gang of Four.
Where would rock 'n' roll be without feedback?

User avatar
Charlie O.
Posts: 43014
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh

Re: Bands who should only have released one album

Postby Charlie O. » 14 Sep 2021, 07:44

Elastica.


Oh, and The Kinks' run of albums from 1966 through 1970 (at least) is unimpeachable. I thought everybody knew that.
Image