Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
- GoogaMooga
- custodian of oldies
- Posts: 30324
- Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
- Location: Denmark
Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
You know how it is, you find a 2 disc special edition, and somehow, you never get around to watching that second disc...
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck
- Charlie O.
- Posts: 44849
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
- Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Commentaries - depends. Sometimes they're interesting, sometimes they annoy me.
I tend to love "Making Of" documentaries and such.
I tend to love "Making Of" documentaries and such.
- Matt Wilson
- Psychedelic Cowpunk
- Posts: 32517
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
- Location: Edge of a continent
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
I usually watch and listen to everything. I try to learn as much about the film as I can. Every once in awhile it's just too much though and I'm burned out by the movie and want to move on to another one.
- GoogaMooga
- custodian of oldies
- Posts: 30324
- Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
- Location: Denmark
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
I am interested in film history and ought to watch and listen to these things, but in a way I feel about them the same way I do with liner notes, I am just glad they are there. So much stuff, so little time...
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck
- Charlie O.
- Posts: 44849
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
- Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
So if you had a choice of a 1-disc version with just the movie or the 2-disc Special Edition - assuming the movie was the same quality on both - which would you go for?
- GoogaMooga
- custodian of oldies
- Posts: 30324
- Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
- Location: Denmark
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Charlie O. wrote:So if you had a choice of a 1-disc version with just the movie or the 2-disc Special Edition - assuming the movie was the same quality on both - which would you go for?
Depends on the price difference. In thrift, they don't distinguish when pricing... I'd pay extra for something really informative and rare footage, good interviews.
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck
- Snarfyguy
- Dominated by the Obscure
- Posts: 53502
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
- Location: New York
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
All of Werner Herzog's classic work is well worth a view with the commentary track on (provided you like his movies in the first place). It's like he's sitting next to you on the couch, and I could listen to him all day.
Unfortunately his interlocutor is kind of an annoying dimwit, but in a perverse way I suppose that makes it better.
Unfortunately his interlocutor is kind of an annoying dimwit, but in a perverse way I suppose that makes it better.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7793
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
The Hitchcock boxset I got a few years back came with interesting little documentaries about each film, and they were well worth a watch. But then again, not many films are as interesting as Hitch's films. Outside of that, I think I've probably watched 9 or 10 bits of commentaries or deleted scenes, maximum. They're normally tedious and pointless. The commentary on the 1941 The Wolf Man film is excellent though, pointing out all the film's stupidities, from the casting of Claude Rains as Lon Chaney Jr's father, to the rare use of the telescope that allows you to see from much lower down than you're standing.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Generally speaking, no. The history of cinema is interesting to me, but not so much the technical side of things. A lot of times I feel the extras ruin the magic.
- pcqgod
- Posts: 19949
- Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 07:23
- Location: Ohio
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Not so much anymore, but I do generally want to hear any director/actor commentary on a movie I enjoy as well as any "making of" doc that doesn't go on too long.
Where would rock 'n' roll be without feedback?
- Ghost of Harry Smith
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 04:43
- Location: shyddney, orstralia
- Contact:
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Well it depends on the film but yes I watch or listen to the notable extras.
I listen to director’s commentaries as if it was a podcast, wandering aroundy my house with wireless headphones on. I don’t think you necessarily need to watch the films while listening to a commentary... I don’t need a shot by shot breakdown, that’s boring.
I listen to director’s commentaries as if it was a podcast, wandering aroundy my house with wireless headphones on. I don’t think you necessarily need to watch the films while listening to a commentary... I don’t need a shot by shot breakdown, that’s boring.
- bobzilla77
- Posts: 16280
- Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
- Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Yeah I wouldn't guarantee I have watched the "extras" on manhy of them.
The only "commentary track" I watched that I would say was truly enjoyable was the one for Spinal Tap. All three members, in character, explicating on what was happening in their career at the time of each bit of footage. I've heard there are some punk documentaries that have commentary tracks that devolve into three old men yelling at each other, I might have to seek out some of those.
But I also like making-of documentaries, and the one included on the Taxi Driver DVD is excellent.
The only "commentary track" I watched that I would say was truly enjoyable was the one for Spinal Tap. All three members, in character, explicating on what was happening in their career at the time of each bit of footage. I've heard there are some punk documentaries that have commentary tracks that devolve into three old men yelling at each other, I might have to seek out some of those.
But I also like making-of documentaries, and the one included on the Taxi Driver DVD is excellent.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.
- Fonz
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:10
- Location: Nevermore
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Darkness_Fish wrote:The Hitchcock boxset I got a few years back came with interesting little documentaries about each film, and they were well worth a watch. But then again, not many films are as interesting as Hitch's films. Outside of that, I think I've probably watched 9 or 10 bits of commentaries or deleted scenes, maximum. They're normally tedious and pointless. The commentary on the 1941 The Wolf Man film is excellent though, pointing out all the film's stupidities, from the casting of Claude Rains as Lon Chaney Jr's father, to the rare use of the telescope that allows you to see from much lower down than you're standing.
That’s the last of the 8 Universal Horror films me and my boy have left to watch, from a blu ray box I got him for Christmas. Some of the extras have been pretty good- the Dracula one for example.
So, DF. Will I be frightened by ‘The Wolf Man’?
Heyyyy!
"Fonz clearly has no fucks to give. I like the cut of his Cupicidal gib."
"Fonz clearly has no fucks to give. I like the cut of his Cupicidal gib."
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7793
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Fonz wrote:So, DF. Will I be frightened by ‘The Wolf Man’?
It's actually not a bad film once you get over the casting and glaring errors. It is what it is, a monster film with a cheap and cheerful supernatural setting complete with gypsies and spells n' stuff. Great fun, with a cast who throw themselves into it, and a good humanising performance from Lon Chaney Jr.
I wouldn't worry too much about nightmares, but I bet you enjoy it quite a lot.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
- Fonz
- Posts: 4088
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:10
- Location: Nevermore
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Bride of Frankenstein is the apogee!
Heyyyy!
"Fonz clearly has no fucks to give. I like the cut of his Cupicidal gib."
"Fonz clearly has no fucks to give. I like the cut of his Cupicidal gib."
- the masked man
- Schadenfreude
- Posts: 27074
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 12:29
- Location: Peterborough
Re: Do you ever bother with extras like commentary, etc.?
Agree with the Spinal Tap commentary. Because the in-character comments add new layers to the narrative - essentially the band believe they were intentionally stitched up by DiBergi - it almost feels like a brand new movie, a weird sequel containing precisely the same footage as the original.
Also agree with Werner Herzog's 70s output. It's really weird how the director discusses, in calm and measured English, some of the utterly outlandish experiences in his dealings with Klaus Kinski, as if making films in this manner is entirely normal. The commentary for Aguirre Wrath of God is an absolute scream!
Also agree with Werner Herzog's 70s output. It's really weird how the director discusses, in calm and measured English, some of the utterly outlandish experiences in his dealings with Klaus Kinski, as if making films in this manner is entirely normal. The commentary for Aguirre Wrath of God is an absolute scream!