five early Smiths

Do talk back

+++++

Hand in Glove
12
38%
Jeane
4
13%
Girl Afraid
7
22%
These Things Take Time
6
19%
Suffer Little Children
3
9%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
Carlsson
hounds people off the board
Posts: 19723
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: selling a self-detonating James Last CD to a Copenhagen thrift store

five early Smiths

Postby Carlsson » 13 May 2018, 18:28











They were better in the early days, weren't they?

Choose three.
caramba wrote:Not sure why other posters above are too scared of Coan to release his new board's URL, the details took
about two minutes to find.

http://preludin.proboards.com

User avatar
clive gash
wannabee enfant terrible
Posts: 17092
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: down the rabbit hole

Re: five early Smiths

Postby clive gash » 13 May 2018, 18:37

QWYTE KLEARLEE it’s the last two.
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.

Diamond Dog wrote:...yet it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce, didn't it?


User avatar
Carlsson
hounds people off the board
Posts: 19723
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: selling a self-detonating James Last CD to a Copenhagen thrift store

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Carlsson » 13 May 2018, 18:44

Yarsh
caramba wrote:Not sure why other posters above are too scared of Coan to release his new board's URL, the details took
about two minutes to find.

http://preludin.proboards.com

Positive Passion
Posts: 797
Joined: 05 Jul 2017, 23:05

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Positive Passion » 13 May 2018, 19:03

I can't agree they were better this early. Their best period came immediately afterwards, with heaven knows, william, etc. But they are incredibly consistent and strangeways is a tremendous record.

User avatar
Carlsson
hounds people off the board
Posts: 19723
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: selling a self-detonating James Last CD to a Copenhagen thrift store

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Carlsson » 13 May 2018, 19:21

Positive Passion wrote:I can't agree they were better this early. Their best period came immediately afterwards, with heaven knows, william, etc.


Quite possibly, yes.

Positive Passion wrote:But they are incredibly consistent and strangeways is a tremendous record.


Not the first time I've heard that, but to me it's The Smiths pumped up and polished for the American market. There are good songs there, but they lost a lot.
caramba wrote:Not sure why other posters above are too scared of Coan to release his new board's URL, the details took
about two minutes to find.

http://preludin.proboards.com

Bent Fabric
Posts: 2966
Joined: 22 Jul 2014, 21:38

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Bent Fabric » 13 May 2018, 20:11

First album and half dozen singles are definitely the golden period for me.

"Suffer..." has that "autumn leaves" feel of the debut in spades.

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 29756
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Matt Wilson » 13 May 2018, 21:02

Never liked "Suffer Little Children," the rest are all aces.
goat boy wrote:For so long now Matt has BCB defined himself as being in opposition to Coan. He’s the Batman to their Joker but they can't deal with Batman ditching the gothic gloom of Gotham for Paris in the spring.