five early Smiths

Do talk back

+++++

Hand in Glove
12
38%
Jeane
4
13%
Girl Afraid
7
22%
These Things Take Time
6
19%
Suffer Little Children
3
9%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
space. invadere
hounds people off the board
Posts: 18647
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: bit reliant on prawns

five early Smiths

Postby space. invadere » 13 May 2018, 18:28











They were better in the early days, weren't they?

Choose three.
GoogaMooga wrote:I've been GoogaMooga everywhere since I went online in 2005. There are copycats on the web incl a Brooklyn Food Festival, who have even adopted my camel case "M".

User avatar
wannabee enfant terrible
wannabee enfant terrible
Posts: 16897
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: forever in Peter’s thoughts

Re: five early Smiths

Postby wannabee enfant terrible » 13 May 2018, 18:37

QWYTE KLEARLEE it’s the last two.
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.

Kal ‘Roger Cock’ Hodgson wrote:I have just discovered that the fake Markus account was not John...I would like to apologise for suggesting it was him.


User avatar
space. invadere
hounds people off the board
Posts: 18647
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: bit reliant on prawns

Re: five early Smiths

Postby space. invadere » 13 May 2018, 18:44

Yarsh
GoogaMooga wrote:I've been GoogaMooga everywhere since I went online in 2005. There are copycats on the web incl a Brooklyn Food Festival, who have even adopted my camel case "M".

Positive Passion
Posts: 693
Joined: 05 Jul 2017, 23:05

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Positive Passion » 13 May 2018, 19:03

I can't agree they were better this early. Their best period came immediately afterwards, with heaven knows, william, etc. But they are incredibly consistent and strangeways is a tremendous record.

User avatar
space. invadere
hounds people off the board
Posts: 18647
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: bit reliant on prawns

Re: five early Smiths

Postby space. invadere » 13 May 2018, 19:21

Positive Passion wrote:I can't agree they were better this early. Their best period came immediately afterwards, with heaven knows, william, etc.


Quite possibly, yes.

Positive Passion wrote:But they are incredibly consistent and strangeways is a tremendous record.


Not the first time I've heard that, but to me it's The Smiths pumped up and polished for the American market. There are good songs there, but they lost a lot.
GoogaMooga wrote:I've been GoogaMooga everywhere since I went online in 2005. There are copycats on the web incl a Brooklyn Food Festival, who have even adopted my camel case "M".

Bent Fabric
Posts: 2823
Joined: 22 Jul 2014, 21:38

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Bent Fabric » 13 May 2018, 20:11

First album and half dozen singles are definitely the golden period for me.

"Suffer..." has that "autumn leaves" feel of the debut in spades.

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 29556
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: five early Smiths

Postby Matt Wilson » 13 May 2018, 21:02

Never liked "Suffer Little Children," the rest are all aces.
Coan wrote:'Vertigo' is one of the best things U2 have ever done, one of a handful of occasions where they get it just right. That bit near the end where the song lifts off? You don't get that with The Allman Brothers.