New Star Wars trilogy

..and why not?
User avatar
joels344
Posts: 1155
Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 17:37
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby joels344 » 12 Nov 2017, 16:30

Toby wrote:
joels344 wrote:I'm not necessarily a Star War diehard or anything, but I see this as a potential positive for the franchise. I thought what Rian Johnson did with Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was refreshing and possibly my favorite work within Star Wars or at the very least, ranks closely to The Empire Strikes Back. F


That was Gareth Edwards, not Rian Johnson.


My not being a huge Star Wars is really showing now. :D

Either way, he’s done excellent work in Breaking Bad. I also enjoyed Looper and Brick. The trilogy seems to be in good hands.

User avatar
PENK
Midnight to Six Man
Posts: 35054
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
Location: Stockholm

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby PENK » 12 Nov 2017, 18:53

The Modernist wrote:
PENK wrote:
And for what it’s worth I think of the Star Wars films - or something like James Bond - as a series that keeps going because it’s grade-A escapism with an established, inviting world that offers possibilities and excitement, though the quality varies from film to film. They’re comfort viewing.


Cheers. I'm sure that's it, but it still seems strange to me as you can get those things from any sci-fi film. Why be obsessed with Luke Skywalker..?


I think that a lot of these things are just down to some random combination of ingredients to be honest. It's often hard to pinpoint some grand artistry or amazing innovation but Star Wars, like Harry Potter, which we spoke about recently, just seems to get the right things in the right place to press people's buttons. You can immerse yourself in that world for the duration of the films whether you're a casual fan or one of these people who knows the names and backstories of all the aliens who appear onscreen for a split-second.

There are a lot of crummy sci-fi films around; nobody buys into The Chronicles of Riddick or Jupiter Ascending the same way they do Star Wars, while Ridley Scott's attempts to build some kind of mythology around his Alien films have been increasingly stupid. Star Wars has a lot of dodgy dialogue, some sizable plot holes, some very silly characters and ideas, and makes little or no attempt at the cutting-edge concept sci-fi of a Dick or Kubrick, yet it somehow works. For a hell of a lot of people.
GoogaMooga wrote:
Minnie Cheddars wrote:Baron got into a fight with some Satan’s Slaves over some culinary issue

Awful thing when that happens. I had a similar experience at a Tom Jones concert.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32789
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Goat Boy » 12 Nov 2017, 19:50

I think its appeal is fairly obvious.

I shall be back to explain later
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:we have lost touch with anything normal

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 12855
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby The Modernist » 12 Nov 2017, 21:44

I can sort of understand people enjoying them, but why the obsession and all the anticipation? They're simplistic kids films ultimately. I'm surprised people don't just grow out of them or get bored of them.

User avatar
Dor-Relip Hotels and Bathings
hounds people off the board
Posts: 19585
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: selling a self-detonating James Last CD to a Copenhagen thrift store

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Dor-Relip Hotels and Bathings » 12 Nov 2017, 22:03

The Modernist wrote:I can sort of understand people enjoying them, but why the obsession and all the anticipation? They're simplistic kids films ultimately. I'm surprised people don't just grow out of them or get bored of them.


I'm with you, G, but I don't get the appeal of this kind of stuff (Bladerunner too) generally.
Darkness_Fish wrote:This is a big fucking mess of absolute shit from the off.

User avatar
Toby
Arsehole all Erect
Posts: 23569
Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
Contact:

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Toby » 13 Nov 2017, 09:15

The Modernist wrote:I can sort of understand people enjoying them, but why the obsession and all the anticipation? They're simplistic kids films ultimately. I'm surprised people don't just grow out of them or get bored of them.


A hell of a lot of it has to do with nostalgia, pure and simple. Roger Ebert once said that "Star Wars colonized our imagination" so that continuing echoes of it through the series of later films after A New Hope had powerful effects. When the trailer for The Force Awakens debuted, I remember seeing my twitter feed explode with comments "I just went back to my childhood for 2 minutes", something that definitely did not happen with the prequel trilogy.

I have doubts as to whether nostalgia is a good thing for artistic purposes - but then again I guess it is a relatively new thing in many respects. How much art previous to film really channelled our childhoods?

User avatar
Dr Markus
Posts: 17670
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 18:16

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Dr Markus » 13 Nov 2017, 12:00

The Modernist wrote:I can sort of understand people enjoying them, but why the obsession and all the anticipation? They're simplistic kids films ultimately. I'm surprised people don't just grow out of them or get bored of them.



You hush your mouth!

*Puts finger to side of temple and starts to concentrate*

Huh, huh, feel a choking sensation?!?!?! Yeah!
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32789
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Goat Boy » 14 Nov 2017, 15:51

Obi Wan-Toby wrote:I don't think these are "any other sci-fi film" because that does a disservice to other science fiction films, and to Star Wars itself. What are these "things"?


Well, it's not Science Fiction; it's Space opera



What are they indeed. For years I thought the phrase “space opera” was used to emphasise the importance of the music in Star Wars rather than being a reference to a bygone sub genre of science fiction:

Space opera is a subgenre of science fiction that emphasizes space warfare, melodramatic adventure, interplanetary battles, chivalric romance, and risk-taking. Set mainly or entirely in outer space, it usually involves conflict between opponents possessing advanced abilities, futuristic weapons, and other sophisticated technology. The term has no relation to music, but is instead a play on the terms "soap opera" and "horse opera",[citation needed] the latter of which was coined during the 1930s to indicate clichéd and formulaic Western movies. Space operas emerged in the 1930s and continue to be produced in literature, film, comics, and video games.


I’d like to think the person who initially used it was canny enough to deploy the phrase understanding that it also captured something fundamentally important and different about Star Wars and that its use of music to heighten and capture emotion and feeling is something close to genius. Name another movie where the score is this important? It’s not that easy.

Star Wars says nothing speculative about human society and where we are heading. It has no ambitions like that at all. The technology is far-fetched and out there (destroying planets?). There is this metaphysical force that maybe has its roots in the hippie revolution’s embrace of eastern mysticism that enables people to manipulate the physical world and do seriously cool shit. Seriously? What is this shit? Why, at my age do I still approach an automatic door and occasional swipe my hand pretending I have Jedi powers. What the fuck is all all that about? And yet in this futuristic world you still have old world shit like people dueling with these things called lightsabres which are basically swords but way cooler. They also make this magical hum which is instantly recognisable and transportive.

It’s not like other science fiction, it really isn’t and when you boil it down I guess it’s something as elemental and eternal as good versus evil but simply relocated to some galaxy far, far away and a long time ago. Sure you can talk about jungian archetypes and how this gives Star Wars its universal, mythic quality. You can talk about the films influences and how they’ve been mashed together into this singular thing: the westerns (The Searchers is directly referenced), the Kurosawa influence (Hidden Fortress, the Jedi/Samurai), the WW2 influence (dogfights, the evil Empire). You can analyse its appeal in a wider cultural and sociological context and posit theories and ideas as to why it hit so hard. Like maybe the timelessness of the good versus evil battle maybe resonated with a generation of Americans who grew up under the shadow of the bomb and Vietnam and Nixon; or that the visual break away from the pristine sterility of 2001 and other science fiction films perhaps chimed with the down at heel 70s. Perhaps the malfunctioning Millennium Falcon fondly reminded people of their beat up Ford Pinto, I don’t know. I wasn’t there man. It’s funny how nobody, bar Spielberg apparently, predicated that this was going to be biggest thing in cinema. How could they? On paper it really shouldn’t play.

To use a musical analogy, Star Wars was the closest cinema has come to the Beatles. Not that they are comparable artistically but its pop culture impact is unsurpassed which is why you get 45 year old men who still dress up as Luke Skywalker. You can talk about a state of arrested development here and that would be perfectly valid and you can also talk about people holding on/reliving their long vanished youth through these movies and that’s certainly a large part of it, no question. Maybe that’s the simplest explanation as to why people still obsess over it and anticipate this thing like nothing else really. Maybe we all are just chasing a feeling, the sense of wonder and magic we experienced as a child when watching these films for the first time. And why the hell not? That’s something worth chasing no? Magic.

The Modernist wrote: Cheers. I'm sure that's it, but it still seems strange to me as you can get those things from any sci-fi film. Why be obsessed with Luke Skywalker..?


Because you rarely get what Star Wars does, at its best, from other science fiction films.

Who is Luke Skywalker? What does he represent? What’s his story arc?

Young man living in some crappy dustbowl planet where nothing happens, occasionally staring off into the distance at night longingly dreaming of adventure. Think of the scene with Luke and two suns. Listen to John Williams music and understand what is very obviously being communicated here. It’s universal and its simplicity does not limit its power. On the contrary it’s the simplicity that gives it its power. Who can’t relate to Luke here? Who hasn’t dreamed what he is dreaming here? It’s a great cinematic moment. Your average science fiction movie has rarely communicated something as profound and elegantly simple as Lucas does here. There are lots of moments like this in the original trilogy, moments where sound and vision combine into something Other. Pure cinema? Magic? I dunno, nostalgia plays a part here – how can it not - but Star Wars is cinematic in a way that most movies aren’t. It understands how to use visuals to communicate ideas and plot and, crucially, it understands how to use music and sound in a profound way. To me, this is what sets it apart and this is what elevates it into the realms of something occasionally great; popular entertainment but done exceptionally well. The fact that the story is simple and that the characters do not have great depth does not negate its obvious quality in my opinion and to focus on the later at the expense of the former is deliberately narrowing the experience and, I think, fundamentally, misunderstanding the movies strengths.

Think of the opening scene of Star Wars. You have the crawl giving you a brief lowdown of what’s happening but you don’t really need to read it to understand the opening scenes. There’s a small ship and it’s being chased by a big ship. The big ship is really, really fucking big and it takes an age to cross the screen. John Williams is absolutely kicking arse, the small ship is desperately trying to escape and there’s a lady dressed in virginal white and then Darth Vadar appears and we know of course that he’s bad ass and not just because he’s dressed like a fucking nightmare but because he’s got this weird breathing thing going on. There is something remarkably pure and direct here. To critics they would dismiss this as adolescent perhaps (it’s for kids!) but to me it communicates something akin to pure pleasure like, say, the opening bars of I Want To Hold Your Hand or the first mouthful of ice cold coke. From a modern standpoint its innocence and simplicity communicates not just the loss of personal innocence but also a cultural innocence too. Like an early Beatles record or Pet Sounds, it speaks to us of a world that has been lost but still exists in the popular consciousness and which we want to return to occasionally. That’s Ok, you know.

Star Wars is full of moments where John Williams music combines with the story to create something with a degree of wonder obviously missing from most Sci-Fi but absolutely present in the best science fiction films (2001, Bladerunner). See also Yoda lifting the X-wing from the swamp or Lukes trench run and that moment where Williams romanticism accompanies Obi Wans mystical nonsense to wonderful affect. Silly? Of course. Hokey? You betcha. Cheesy? Shit yeah! But that music! It’s uncanny.

And it’s not just the magnificent score either, the noises too are great and so memorable and iconic. Like Bleep says, just hearing these funny things can be transportive: the screeching of Tie fighters, the excitable jabbering of the Jawas, R2-D2s blips and beeps which communicate childlike excitement but also childlike disappointment, the cosmic hum of the lightsabres and so. The sound design is full of invention and brilliance giving objects real character, humanity. The Millennium Falcon is not just the fastest ship in the galaxy. It’s a living, breathing thing, a character in itself which is why people go all giddy when they see it blasting a tie fighter and performing some death defying manoeuvre. It’s like watching an 80 year old Clint Eastwood wiping out a bad guy.

Anyway, let’s go back to Luke for a while. So he manages to escape this rock and he goes off on his adventure and he ends up meeting the baddest man in the galaxy and they have a fight and he loses a hand and he learns that the baddest man in the galaxy is actually the Old Man. Ouch! Who the hell saw that one coming? One of cinemas greatest twists. So now he has to kill his own Father but he's scared that he might become his Father too so he's wrestling with his own identity and destiny but instead of debating whether he follows the old man into accounting, it's whether he's going to turn to the dark side and rule the galaxy. With a metal hand. This is not your typical sci fi shit nor is it typical of movies in general, the killing your own Father thing I mean. So we’re back to that phrase: space opera.

I’m not going to pretend I’m an opera aficionado but I know that some silly, weird shit happens in these things. Moments of absurd, over the top melodrama accompanied by music of bombast, romance, beauty, magic, all that shit. The opera world is, well, the opera world. It inhabits its own place. Star Wars does too. Even with all its influences and age old hero myths it inhabits its own world within cinema. There is nothing else quite like it and consequently it’s a world people like to revisit. Even with its flaws and plot holes and clumsy dialogue and hammy acting because when it gets it right, it really gets it fucking right. For two movies it got it right.
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:we have lost touch with anything normal

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 29690
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Matt Wilson » 14 Nov 2017, 16:31

Damn, Dougie! You can write, son...
John Coan wrote:I've lived in many different countries in Europe and whenever I come home I think 'England is the best'

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 29690
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Matt Wilson » 14 Nov 2017, 17:16

Darryl Strawberry wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:For two movies it got it right


Three.

Return of the Jedi is brilliant.


It so isn't. Episode 3 is far better.
John Coan wrote:I've lived in many different countries in Europe and whenever I come home I think 'England is the best'

User avatar
Rayge
Posts: 13674
Joined: 14 Aug 2013, 11:37
Location: deepest Devon
Contact:

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Rayge » 14 Nov 2017, 17:17

I'm impressed by Dougie's analysis, but the one SW film I saw (the first), I realized it was basically a fairy tale with fancy hardware to get the boys interested, aimed at people half my age.
Of course if it works for you then, you can make it part of your mythology for the rest of your life: my son saw the original as a young teen, and now, approaching 50, takes his sons along to every new showing and enjoys it hugely. I'm not knocking it, it's just that I already had my fix of this sort of thing as a teen, and I couldn't really suspend disbelief because I could see through it, in the sense that I was aware of the construction, and it also came out around the time I stopped going to the cinema because I moved somewhere I couldn't get to one easily.
Just another downbeat and tangential Rayge post, safe to ignore.
In timeless moments we live forever

You can't play a tune on an absolute

Negative Capability...when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact & reason”

User avatar
Dor-Relip Hotels and Bathings
hounds people off the board
Posts: 19585
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: selling a self-detonating James Last CD to a Copenhagen thrift store

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Dor-Relip Hotels and Bathings » 14 Nov 2017, 19:22

Interesting - and sort of sad - how for some people magic is present in certain examples of art yet for others it's just 'flat'.

I'm with Ray more than Dougie but that's one fuck of a piece of writing, D.
Darkness_Fish wrote:This is a big fucking mess of absolute shit from the off.

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 15734
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Belle Lettre » 14 Nov 2017, 19:47

Darryl Strawberry wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:For two movies it got it right


Three.

Return of the Jedi is brilliant. The fight scene between Luke and Vader is incredible.

Yes, three, despite the Ewoks.

Stirring post, Dougie. There is another film where the score is as important - Jaws of course, more John Williams.
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 12855
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby The Modernist » 14 Nov 2017, 23:02

[quote="Rayge"]I'm impressed by Dougie's analysis, but the one SW film I saw (the first), I realized it was basically a fairy tale with fancy hardware to get the boys interested, aimed at people half my age. /quote]

Yeah, Dougie's put a lot into that post so I'm loathe to dissect it and pick holes. But I think it's success is chiefly a lowest common denominator thing (thematically it's on the same level as a 30s Flash Gordon film) combined with very clever marketing. And once you've bought into it then you becoming part of this gigantic community of fans and I think people are really drawn to those kind of shared experiences, and because it's been going so long shared histories, these days.

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 12855
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby The Modernist » 14 Nov 2017, 23:05

Belle Lettre wrote:
Stirring post, Dougie. There is another film where the score is as important - Jaws of course, more John Williams.


There are tons of films where the score is hugely important, although it's hard to think of someone as unsubtle and blindingly obvious as Williams (Danny Effman comes close), which is probably what is meant here.

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 12855
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby The Modernist » 14 Nov 2017, 23:08

Rayge wrote:I'm impressed by Dougie's analysis, but the one SW film I saw (the first), I realized it was basically a fairy tale with fancy hardware to get the boys interested, aimed at people half my age.


Yeah, Dougie's put a lot into that post so I'm loathe to dissect it and pick holes. But I think it's success is chiefly a lowest common denominator thing (thematically it's on the same level as a 30s Flash Gordon film) combined with very clever marketing. And once you've bought into it then you becoming part of this gigantic community of fans and I think people are really drawn to those kind of shared experiences, and because it's been going so long shared histories, these days.

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 15734
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Belle Lettre » 15 Nov 2017, 00:13

The Modernist wrote:
Belle Lettre wrote:
Stirring post, Dougie. There is another film where the score is as important - Jaws of course, more John Williams.


There are tons of films where the score is hugely important, although it's hard to think of someone as unsubtle and blindingly obvious as Williams (Danny Effman comes close), which is probably what is meant here.

Oh, thank you for making that clear :D
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
Stille Baron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 43111
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Stille Baron » 15 Nov 2017, 04:36

Star Wars came out when I was 3. I was too young to see it in the movies. Empire came out, when was it, 81? I was 7 and saw it 3 times at the theatre. I loved it like everyone else and more than most of my friends. I got as many toys as I could talk my parents into buying and watched the Saturday morning cartoons in feverish anticipation to see commercials for the new stuff that was coming out as the new movies were being rolled out.

Goat Boy talked about the movies as “cinema.” On that level, in my humble opinion, they are absolute fucking tripe.

Star Wars nostalgia (as displayed by many of my 40 something friends and acquaintances who still buy toys or have new merch and are still way into it all) makes me want to puke.

But you know what I do when a new one is coming out? I watch the trailer when someone posts it or I run across it on TV, and I get a little excited. Then I go see it in the theatre, and I always have a good time. And you know why?

Toby wrote:There's a whole load of aesthetics involved with the Star Wars trilogy that, if you were into them as a child, just seem to hit the serotonin when you watch them as an adult. If it's not the "beat up" nature of the setting, with dusty, falling apart spaceships, then it might be just the sound of lightsabers igniting or the music itself, which is a fundamental part of the movies.


Hearing the Star Wars sounds, seeing the Star Wars colors, and seeing just how badass the Star Wars bad guys look in the new movie. Those things are all major seratonin depth charges and make it totally worth it. That shit makes me really happy.
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32789
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Goat Boy » 15 Nov 2017, 10:01

The Modernist wrote:
Belle Lettre wrote:
Stirring post, Dougie. There is another film where the score is as important - Jaws of course, more John Williams.


There are tons of films where the score is hugely important, although it's hard to think of someone as unsubtle and blindingly obvious as Williams (Danny Effman comes close), which is probably what is meant here.


There are but that wasn’t quite my point. Few movies use the score in such an elemental way to the point where it feels more important than what’s actually happening on screen. It’s like a running commentary throughout the movies. I think it’s hugely effective, you think it’s shit. The main theme of Lawrence of Arabia is not subtle either. Subtlety is not always a virtue (I actually do think there is subtlety and beauty btw)

(thematically it's on the same level as a 30s Flash Gordon film)


I disagree. Compare the Flash Gordon movie to Star Wars triology I absolutely do think there is more thematic depth there. It many ways Lukes coming of age story and that’s the main theme and probably what resonates most deeply with some fans but it touches on other stuff too. Vadars story, for example, is ultimately one of redemption, where the simple good/evil dichotomy is challenged creating something more interesting and, yes, thematically nuanced. None of this is examined with any real depth it’s fair to say but it doesn’t have to be. Just touching on things is sometimes enough in a film. I mean somebody mentioned Bladerunner and I think that’s pretty superficial in its exploration of what it means to be a human but it’s deep enough, you know? I think Star Wars is as deep as it needs to be.

Frankly I don’t think you, or Coan for that matter have much feel for this sorta thing. By ‘thing’ I mean blockbuster popcorn movies with an emphasis on special effects and pure immersive escapism. Coan is more likely to watch Alan Bennett arsing about with a crumpet and talking about such middling holiday in fucking Scunthorpe* and I don’t see much evidence of you seeking this kind of movie out either. That’s cool.

But when you say stuff like this:

But I think it's success is chiefly a lowest common denominator thing combined with very clever marketing. And once you've bought into it then you becoming part of this gigantic community of fans and I think people are really drawn to those kind of shared experiences, and because it's been going so long shared histories, these days.


Then I think you’re starting to sound like a bit of tedious snob here.

People do like to belong to a group, of course and, yes, people do seek out shared experiences but to reduce its appeal to this and “clever marketing” is too reductionist and a wee bit patronising. Besides, not all Star wars fans are part of that particular community and I certainly don't feel much kinship with it, particularly the hardcore element but then I feel an aversion to groups in general. It's always been a more personal relationship for me.

Anyway, we’ve been here before every time Star Wars comes up on here and it’s a bit boring really because opinions are so polarised. I think I’ve said about as much as I can you know? :)

* to be serious Coan likes character driven movies set in the real world
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:we have lost touch with anything normal

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32789
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: New Star Wars trilogy

Postby Goat Boy » 15 Nov 2017, 10:25

Darryl Strawberry wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:For two movies it got it right


Three.

Return of the Jedi is brilliant. The fight scene between Luke and Vader is incredible.



I think it’s a significant step down but, yeah, the final battle accompanied by the choral music is great. A real highlight.

The original premise would have been more interesting and downbeat. Obviously Gary Katz left due to creative differences with Lucas over the direction of the movie sadly
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:we have lost touch with anything normal