Former President Donald J. Trump

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 15 Feb 2017, 16:52

Jimbo wrote:Shouldn't the US military be off fighting ISIS or Al Qaida or Assad or Boko Haram, those very bad men in Africa who kidnapped the "Bring them home" school girls? Suddenly you don't hear much about ISLAMIC TERRORISM. Now it's RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

Whatthefuckever.


Uh...the military is not fighting Russia. WTF are you talking about?

Are you actually arguing that the press shouldn't be paying attention to the possibility that our president may have conspired with a foreign government to get elected? Is it not newsworthy in your mind that that same foreign government is now violating a treaty with us? Instead we should be talking generically about Islamic terror?

Seriously Jimbo. What's the view like up in there?
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby sloopjohnc » 15 Feb 2017, 16:55

Davey the Fat Boy wrote:
Jimbo wrote:Shouldn't the US military be off fighting ISIS or Al Qaida or Assad or Boko Haram, those very bad men in Africa who kidnapped the "Bring them home" school girls? Suddenly you don't hear much about ISLAMIC TERRORISM. Now it's RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

Whatthefuckever.


Uh...the military is not fighting Russia. WTF are you talking about?

Are you actually arguing that the press shouldn't be paying attention to the possibility that our president may have conspired with a foreign government to get elected? Is it not newsworthy in your mind that that same foreign government is now violating a treaty with us? Instead we should be talking generically about Islamic terror?

Seriously Jimbo. What's the view like up in there?


Up there?

I think your sense of geography needs to be re-examined.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Count Machuki » 15 Feb 2017, 17:01

Remember how many times we (well, *I* at least) thought Trump was DONE during the campaign?

I can't shake that memory.

This really, really does look like a clusterfuck that it's going to take some serious, serious shady shit to get out of, though

IS HE DONE? (y/n)

?
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 15 Feb 2017, 17:14

sloopjohnc wrote:
Davey the Fat Boy wrote:
Jimbo wrote:Shouldn't the US military be off fighting ISIS or Al Qaida or Assad or Boko Haram, those very bad men in Africa who kidnapped the "Bring them home" school girls? Suddenly you don't hear much about ISLAMIC TERRORISM. Now it's RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.

Whatthefuckever.


Uh...the military is not fighting Russia. WTF are you talking about?

Are you actually arguing that the press shouldn't be paying attention to the possibility that our president may have conspired with a foreign government to get elected? Is it not newsworthy in your mind that that same foreign government is now violating a treaty with us? Instead we should be talking generically about Islamic terror?

Seriously Jimbo. What's the view like up in there?


Up there?

I think your sense of geography needs to be re-examined.


If you go far enough...it's up.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 15 Feb 2017, 17:16

Count Machuki wrote:Remember how many times we (well, *I* at least) thought Trump was DONE during the campaign?

I can't shake that memory.

This really, really does look like a clusterfuck that it's going to take some serious, serious shady shit to get out of, though

IS HE DONE? (y/n)

?


Watch his poll numbers with Republicans. When they dip under 50...that's when congress will start carving him up.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Count Machuki » 15 Feb 2017, 17:28

Davey the Fat Boy wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:
IS HE DONE? (y/n)

?


Watch his poll numbers with Republicans. When they dip under 50...that's when congress will start carving him up.


how could they be at 50 or above right now? How the hell could that BE?
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 15 Feb 2017, 17:29

Count Machuki wrote:
Davey the Fat Boy wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:
IS HE DONE? (y/n)

?


Watch his poll numbers with Republicans. When they dip under 50...that's when congress will start carving him up.


how could they be at 50 or above right now? How the hell could that BE?


Because he's doing what he said he would do and the meddling liberal elites can't take it and are out to get him. And they are peddling this fake news.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Count Machuki » 15 Feb 2017, 17:50

Still Baron wrote:[...] the meddling liberal elites can't take it and are out to get him.


We are? Oh, yeah. I totally am. :evil:
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Count Machuki » 15 Feb 2017, 18:24

Count Machuki wrote: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Official: Trump won't insist on 'two-state solution' - Israel National News
Israel National News › ... › Middle East
2 hours ago - Senior White House official: Peace is the goal, but we will no longer insist on “two-state solution”


:o



Fuckin HUH?

"So I'm looking at two-state and one-state — and I like the one that both parties like," Trump said.


http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/ ... state-plan
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 16143
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Belle Lettre » 15 Feb 2017, 18:33

The pretence is over, at least
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 16283
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby bobzilla77 » 15 Feb 2017, 18:39

Finally, a hopeful news story!

EDIT: This post seems to be lost in time... it was a response to the "He'll die in jail" tweet posted Machuki a page ago.

It is NOT a response to the "I'm OK with a one state solution" news, which I saw on CNN while picking up breakfast and stood there with my mouth open for a minute or two.
Last edited by bobzilla77 on 15 Feb 2017, 20:13, edited 1 time in total.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 15 Feb 2017, 19:12

Count Machuki wrote:
Still Baron wrote:[...] the meddling liberal elites can't take it and are out to get him.


We are? Oh, yeah. I totally am. :evil:


See also, on "Divided Media":

NYT wrote:One narrative holds Mr. Flynn, and others who knew about his discussions, accountable. The other portrays Mr. Flynn more as a victim.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/busi ... onage.html
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
naughty boy
hounds people off the board
Posts: 20266
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby naughty boy » 15 Feb 2017, 19:33

Belle Lettre wrote:The pretence is over, at least


Yeah, that's how I see it. There's a kind of transparency.
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53502
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Snarfyguy » 15 Feb 2017, 20:17

Count Machuki wrote:Remember how many times we (well, *I* at least) thought Trump was DONE during the campaign?

I can't shake that memory.

This really, really does look like a clusterfuck that it's going to take some serious, serious shady shit to get out of, though

IS HE DONE? (y/n)

?

You know we're in bizarro-world when normal people are praying that the Koch Brothers will help them, but I think the powers-that-be are really very much unamused by Trump's antics, and as Davey suggests there's a tipping point, and when it hits they're going to get rid of him like a used condom.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby sloopjohnc » 15 Feb 2017, 21:52

New labor secretary, Puzder, apparently just resigned.

What a puzder.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53502
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Snarfyguy » 15 Feb 2017, 23:35

sloopjohnc wrote:New labor secretary, Puzder, apparently just resigned.

What a puzder.

Rather, he withdrew himself from consideration as a nominee for the position.

He wasn't racist enough anyway.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 14077
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Sneelock » 16 Feb 2017, 00:07

Thanks Oprah! let's see who they send up instead. you think it might be somebody remotely qualified for the position?



NAH.
uggy poopy doody.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Count Machuki » 16 Feb 2017, 00:10

Do you think Sessions has the pants to investigate a President who give him a job he wasn't qualified for?


edit: i definitely DON'T think so, but I'm waiting for our local Sessions eggspert, thang yew very much
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 16 Feb 2017, 00:51

Well, he's obviously "qualified" to be AG, as far as resumes go. But he won't investigate Trump any more than Eric Holder would've investigated Obama. That's the way of the world.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: President Donald J. Trump

Postby Count Machuki » 16 Feb 2017, 01:00

your quote marks belie your objectivity, but it's a point well taken
where does that leave investigations on Trump and Russia?
is it all on Congress to get to the bottom of this?
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D


Return to “Nextdoorland”