So, GOD then

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks

nail yr colours to the mast. heathen scum

Atheist
24
44%
Non-Theist
4
7%
Agnostic
7
13%
Monotheist (male deity)
6
11%
Monotheist (female deity)
1
2%
Polytheist
2
4%
Pantheist
7
13%
Autotheist
3
6%
 
Total votes: 54

User avatar
Zeke
Posts: 2970
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 00:37
Location: A dead in the eyes, soulless robot

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Zeke » 30 Jul 2014, 17:54

Minnie Darling wrote:K and Zen, you're not going to get sucked off at this rate.



Not even with the thrill of eternal damnation hanging in the balance? Amongst other things...

User avatar
Zeke
Posts: 2970
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 00:37
Location: A dead in the eyes, soulless robot

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Zeke » 30 Jul 2014, 17:55

Foxhound wrote:
Zen Coan wrote:
Foxhound wrote:Sorry. I couldn't resist. Carry on people.


Pipe down in the cheap seats!


Had I paid anything I'd be demanding a refund.

:lol:


Oh, do pipe down. Here, stuff your gob with this:

Image

User avatar
Foxhound
Posts: 2415
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 17:52
Location: By the back fence near the tracks.

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Foxhound » 30 Jul 2014, 17:58

Zen Coan wrote:
Minnie Darling wrote:K and Zen, you're not going to get sucked off at this rate.


Not even with the thrill of eternal damnation hanging in the balance? Amongst other things...


Do some religions still insist that sex is a bad thing? Twould be a sad and sorry state of affairs if they did.

:?
Brits out of the Falklands!

Evangeline - living on in our hearts though long removed from our shores.

Beebsy wrote:Fuck off. Wanker.

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 17:59

Minnie Darling wrote:K and Zen, you're not going to get sucked off at this rate.


What have they done to you?

:?
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 14077
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Sneelock » 30 Jul 2014, 18:00

best God thread ever.

sloop, I'm sorry to hear about your state of affairs.
I hope you won't think it presumptuous of me but I would like to offer you a religious artifact of my faith. It often gives me great comfort.

Image
uggy poopy doody.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32974
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Goat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:01

I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism

User avatar
Minnie the Minx
funky thigh collector
Posts: 33547
Joined: 29 Dec 2006, 16:00
Location: In the naughty North and in the sexy South

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Minnie the Minx » 30 Jul 2014, 18:01

Betty Denim wrote:
Minnie Darling wrote:K and Zen, you're not going to get sucked off at this rate.


What have they done to you?

:?


:D







:x
You come at the Queen, you best not miss.

Dr Markus wrote:
Someone in your line of work usually as their own man cave aka the shed we're they can potter around fixing stuff or something don't they?


Flower wrote:I just did a google search.

User avatar
'skope
BCB poster of the year 2014
Posts: 6248
Joined: 07 Jun 2014, 13:19
Location: on diamond dog's ignore list

Re: So, GOD then

Postby 'skope » 30 Jul 2014, 18:02

Betty Denim wrote:
Minnie Darling wrote:K and Zen, you're not going to get sucked off at this rate.


What have they done to you?

:?


:D

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:03

Zen Coan wrote:
Betty Denim wrote:
Zen Coan wrote:Your descriptions were generally contemptuous in tone and intent. That's shit slinging. If it matters to you whether or not you sling shit then keep your contempt to yourself.

I say sling it if you feel it.


My intent is not up for your grabs.


Oh, it was clear enough. Be as obtuse as you like it was unmissable.


Tone, your interpretation is perfectly valid.



How kind of you to say so. How very kind.


You come over a bit soft though. :?



I guess I'll just have to try harder. I do aim to please.


I'm really not contemptuous of atheists at all.

You seem so wound up though. Relax.
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:05

Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


Were you at the right end?

You do have form. :P
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:09

K wrote:
Betty Denim wrote:
K wrote:Well you stated that atheists lack wonder, which is untrue. There are a couple of interpretations.

1. You don't know what I mean by wonder
2. You are fucking stupid.
3. You're making it up as you go along.


I said they lacked the wonder of and in certain things. Not in anything.

I don't need your Ladybird version of Unweaving the Rainbow. What do you think this is? Dead Poets Society?

I know lots of people gushed over your previous post but really Betty you write very badly. It's why you have to make things up as you go along.


K! You're not allowed to say someone's a bad writer!

:o
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:10

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:K - She didn't just exclude atheists. She said that all non-Catholics are missing out on the specific brand of wonder and romance she finds in Catholicism.

And she is right.


She wrote "Atheists lack wonder" Don't add extra qualifications. Lack doesn't mean, 'have in short supply' or 'have a different brand'.


She then went on to explain the specific wonders that Atheists lack (belief in God/angels, etc...). She didn't say that atheists lack all wonder.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:13

Zen Coan wrote:So her contempt is even less exclusive than we thought?

Fabulous!


I don't read it as contempt at all. Again...she excluded me. I didn't mind. I don't deny that I am missing whatever Catholicism has to offer.

We all miss something. Choose one path, you miss all the others.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:16

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:
K wrote:
Atheists lack wonder in things they don't believe in.
Right.
Atheists wonder why people believe in angels.
Better.


K - everyone lacks wonder in the things they don't believe in. Wonder requires some level of buy-in.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
harvey k-tel
Long Player
Posts: 40893
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: So, GOD then

Postby harvey k-tel » 30 Jul 2014, 18:16

I just watched a video of a dolphin fucking the headless corpse of a fish. I'm starting to think there might be a god after all.
Tempora mutatur et nos mutamur in illis

User avatar
Zeke
Posts: 2970
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 00:37
Location: A dead in the eyes, soulless robot

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Zeke » 30 Jul 2014, 18:18

Betty Denim wrote:You seem so wound up though. Relax.


With the possibility of a hellfire inspired blowjob denied me?

You ask too much!

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 14077
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Sneelock » 30 Jul 2014, 18:18

VRZ Robotz wrote:Wonder requires some level of buy-in.


roughly two bucks a loaf American.
Image
uggy poopy doody.

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 14077
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Sneelock » 30 Jul 2014, 18:22

for the dolphin and the chimp or for the fish and the frog?
uggy poopy doody.

User avatar
naughty boy
hounds people off the board
Posts: 20266
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: So, GOD then

Postby naughty boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:24

Betty Denim wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


Were you at the right end?

You do have form. :P


:lol: :lol:
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.

User avatar
naughty boy
hounds people off the board
Posts: 20266
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: So, GOD then

Postby naughty boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:26

K wrote:Don't tell Coan I said it. He'll be giving it the old "You're a bit thick, I used to like you, stop acting like the board's conscience" triumvirate.


'triumvirate', eh?

Do you teach RE, K?
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.


Return to “Nextdoorland”