Without whom this wouldn't have been possible....

Backslapping time. Well done us. We are fantastic.
Phil T

Postby Phil T » 04 Mar 2005, 19:59

The Slider wrote:
bhoywonder wrote:James Jamerson, christ yes, or Duck Dunn? No, JJ is the key.



Image


Oh yes. That rusty, septic sound of his on the early stuff was bloody great!

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 69577
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Postby Diamond Dog » 05 Mar 2005, 07:10

The Right Summery Profile wrote:
andymacandy wrote:
Diamond Dog wrote:Do Roxy Music deserve a mention?

I guess if members of the punk movement looked at them and thought, "f*ck that" lets make some proper music......
Seriously, why?


The nature of introducing avant-wizzadary into pop music (Brian Eno, again should be on the list, or at least in the "they also served" section), and in their own way I guess they kind of paved the way for the sampling/post modern tendencies in pop: the high concept, throw-things-in-a-pan approach. That's the pop world today. Or parts of it anyway. But I don't think it's enough. Important, perhaps, but again, a near-miss.

But as I said, we should include (or at least consider) Brian Eno if we're even going to think about Roxy, solely because of the amount of music he was involved in and developed--or at least anticipated (c.f. Ambient)


Weren't they one of the first 'fusion' bands - I've never been able to define their 'pigeonhole' (the early years, at least) and I just wonder if they opened up the field that way?

The points about Eno are valid - but was he really the originator of 'ambient'?
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 69577
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Postby Diamond Dog » 05 Mar 2005, 17:32

Interesting way to look at it Goldie. Any other opinions on Roxy Music?
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 05 Mar 2005, 17:54

bhoywonder wrote:[
Yes, is the answer. James Jamerson, christ yes, or Duck Dunn? No, JJ is the key. Strewth! And if McCartney wasn't in as part of the Beatles, he should be in for his contribution to what bass playing could be.


I know this isn't the path that DD wants to take, but what's so special about Duck Dunn?
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Jeff K
The Original K
Posts: 32699
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:08
Location: Pennsylvania USA
Contact:

Postby Jeff K » 05 Mar 2005, 18:20

I'm trying to think of a female artist to add but I'm coming up empty handed. I see a few mentions of Bessie Smith and Billie Holiday but it doesn't seem right to have an all male list, does it? There has to be some woman worthy of inclusion. Aretha Franklin? Loretta Lynn?
the science eel experiment wrote:Jesus Christ can't save BCB, i believe i can.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 05 Mar 2005, 18:57

goldwax wrote:
LeBaron wrote:
bhoywonder wrote:[
Yes, is the answer. James Jamerson, christ yes, or Duck Dunn? No, JJ is the key. Strewth! And if McCartney wasn't in as part of the Beatles, he should be in for his contribution to what bass playing could be.


I know this isn't the path that DD wants to take, but what's so special about Duck Dunn?


He never got fired.


Well, for real, I mean, maybe there's a less is more argument to be made. He stayed out of everyone else's way I guess. And he seems like a likeable goober type.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
T. Berry Shuffle
sharp-eyed archivist
Posts: 3863
Joined: 17 Jul 2003, 02:56
Location: The Golden Road

Postby T. Berry Shuffle » 06 Mar 2005, 00:42

LeBaron wrote:
bhoywonder wrote:[
Yes, is the answer. James Jamerson, christ yes, or Duck Dunn? No, JJ is the key. Strewth! And if McCartney wasn't in as part of the Beatles, he should be in for his contribution to what bass playing could be.


I know this isn't the path that DD wants to take, but what's so special about Duck Dunn?


That's a question that Duck actually voices himself in Sweet Soul Music.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 06 Mar 2005, 00:47

Shuffle John Estes wrote:
LeBaron wrote:
bhoywonder wrote:[
Yes, is the answer. James Jamerson, christ yes, or Duck Dunn? No, JJ is the key. Strewth! And if McCartney wasn't in as part of the Beatles, he should be in for his contribution to what bass playing could be.


I know this isn't the path that DD wants to take, but what's so special about Duck Dunn?


That's a question that Duck actually voices himself in Sweet Soul Music.


Another book I should re-read! Shit, I should probably buy a new copy with hopes that the discography has been updated. A ton of stuff has come into print. Actually, I meant to return to this thread and repent. While running some afternoon errands, Eddie Floyd's "Knock On Wood" came on the radio and, well, I felt ashamed.
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 69577
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Postby Diamond Dog » 08 Mar 2005, 12:36

Did either Duck Dunn or James Jefferson change music irrevocably?
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine

User avatar
James R
the grocer of despair
Posts: 9914
Joined: 17 Jul 2003, 03:53
Location: seated sultanically among the moons of Saturn
Contact:

Postby James R » 08 Mar 2005, 14:27

Diamond Dog wrote:The points about Eno are valid - but was he really the originator of 'ambient'?


I think it was Erik Satie who came up with a concept called "musique d'ameublement" (sic—I'm sure one of our French residents will correct me there) or "furniture music", or background music that is not meant to be consciously listened to. I think Eno's conception of ambient music is in a similar vein, music you can listen to if you choose or ignore if you choose to do that instead.
pcqgod wrote:I like how Liebling progresses from a rotting, animated corpse living in his parents' basement to a slightly more life-affirming walking corpse by the end of the movie.

Goat Boy wrote:I recall a midget with large tits dancing.

User avatar
The Write Profile
2017 BCB Cup Champ
Posts: 14755
Joined: 15 Sep 2003, 10:55
Location: Today, Tomorrow, Timaru
Contact:

Postby The Write Profile » 08 Mar 2005, 21:14

James R wrote:
Diamond Dog wrote:The points about Eno are valid - but was he really the originator of 'ambient'?


I think it was Erik Satie who came up with a concept called "musique d'ameublement" (sic—I'm sure one of our French residents will correct me there) or "furniture music", or background music that is not meant to be consciously listened to. I think Eno's conception of ambient music is in a similar vein, music you can listen to if you choose or ignore if you choose to do that instead.


But in saying that I think the key difference is that Brian Eno had a definitively "pop" sensibility. No matter what he argues, he clearly intended people to listen to his music (as opposed to soaking it in). He basically took the "ambient" concept and stripped it of some of its esoterica. Or at least that's how I feel about it, although I tend to prefer his work with Bowie, Roxy, and his early solo stuff.

If he's going to be on the list, it's because he clearly existed at a divide between the old and new worlds of pop music. He might not have been the first (I certainly can't claim to be anything remotely in the same ballpark as an "expert", perhaps Bleep could help us?), but he was certainly the most noticeable, perhaps.

As I said, I don't know enough about him so this is all theory.
It's before my time but I've been told, he never came back from Karangahape Road.

User avatar
JQW
Posts: 29052
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 13:27
Location: The Crazy Loquat, Szegerely

Postby JQW » 09 Mar 2005, 16:02

The true musical pioneers can be split to two strains - those that made the rules, and those that broke them. Which strain would you consider to be more important?
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. - Bertrand Russell

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 69577
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Postby Diamond Dog » 09 Mar 2005, 16:13

Paul G wrote:The true musical pioneers can be split to two strains - those that made the rules, and those that broke them. Which strain would you consider to be more important?


Good point - but surely those that made them were the ones that broke the previous rules?
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine

User avatar
bhoywonder
The Magnificent
Posts: 27391
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:06
Location: Bristol, UK
Contact:

Postby bhoywonder » 09 Mar 2005, 17:37

Diamond Dog wrote:Did either Duck Dunn or James Jefferson change music irrevocably?


Well, it could be that I'm just a fan, but I would say they were pioneers of the electric bass, and i electric bass isn't important in pop music then I don't know what is.

When were the first electric basses produced? Mid-50s? Without this instrument, motown wouldn't have really existed, nor the southern r'n'b labels, nor 60s pop, rock and everything that came after it. How much of a difference the electric bass made compared to the stand-up variety is up for debate then, but if electric bass revolutionised pop, which I think it did in many ways, then these guys made it so. And mostly by playing very simple, repetitive grooves, whicwas less common on stand up, where jazz, country and walking styles were the way.

Just a thought, likes.

Bungo the Mungo

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 09 Mar 2005, 20:58

bhoywonder wrote:When were the first electric basses produced? Mid-50s? Without this instrument, motown wouldn't have really existed, nor the southern r'n'b labels, nor 60s pop, rock and everything that came after it. How much of a difference the electric bass made compared to the stand-up variety is up for debate then, but if electric bass revolutionised pop, which I think it did in many ways, then these guys made it so. And mostly by playing very simple, repetitive grooves, whicwas less common on stand up, where jazz, country and walking styles were the way.

Just a thought, likes.


great post, bhoy! the electric bass is certainly one of the unsung components of popular music as we know it, and in jamerson and dunn you have two of the best exponents. for me, the key to good bass playing is simplicity and groove, but with an inventive twist which gives it the 'wow' factor.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 69577
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Postby Diamond Dog » 10 Mar 2005, 08:28

I'd never really tought about he electric bass - one just takes it as it's always been there Of course, it's worthy of consideration.
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine

User avatar
KeithPratt
Arsehole all Erect
Posts: 23901
Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
Contact:

Postby KeithPratt » 10 Mar 2005, 12:23

Good thread - it's been enjoyable reading it, but my own thoughts are that we should avoid categorising and listing purely because it creates a canon, and when that happens, then it's inevitable that people are left out.

There are many artists on here that within the parameters of popular music within an Anglo-W.European field in the last 50 years could be defined as important, but outside of that, are they really? We're now hearing and talking about music on a global scale, far beyond the initial heady rush of the sixties.

In the long run I bet Stockhausen will be seen as far more important than Bob Dylan and The Beatles for example. Debussy, Satie and Varese's work I reckon has been overlooked.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 69577
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Postby Diamond Dog » 10 Mar 2005, 19:55

Bleep - I really don't know enough about Stockhausen to comment. I know you consider that particular body of wotk essential - tell us why.
Nicotine, valium, vicadin, marijuana, ecstasy, and alcohol -
Cocaine

User avatar
Spock!
Posts: 15976
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:26
Location: By the banks of the mighty Bourne

Postby Spock! » 26 Mar 2005, 00:56

Bump!

User avatar
Penk!
Midnight to Six Man
Posts: 35784
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
Location: Stockholm

Postby Penk! » 26 Mar 2005, 02:29

Josh wrote:Bump!


To be honest I think you're alone in considering them worthy of inclusion. After all, they only made the one album and it was hardly groundbreaking, in fact it was somewhat derivative.
fange wrote:One of the things i really dislike in this life is people raising their voices in German.


Return to “Classic Threads & Treasury of Mirth”