This is a pig of a match. Nothing to choose between them.
I'll have to come back to this.
PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
- trans-chigley express
- Posts: 19238
- Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 01:50
- Location: Asia's WC
- pcqgod
- Posts: 19948
- Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 07:23
- Location: Ohio
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
A, I guess. Caravan is a lot more boring than I remember, but that Tull thing was too cloying for my taste.
Where would rock 'n' roll be without feedback?
- Pigpen
- Posts: 3525
- Joined: 21 Jul 2010, 16:46
- Location: Ebor
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
Almost impossible to pick a winner.... but I guess it is A by a flukey drop - goal in the final play of extra time
Harvey K-Tel wrote:Do you cunts actually listen to this stuff for pleasure??! Holy fucking shit. I fell asleep (honestly) while I was listening to A, but anything, even a sleepy fart, is better than B.
- fange
- 100% fangetastic
- Posts: 14171
- Joined: 20 Jan 2010, 11:30
- Location: 香港
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
never/ever wrote:A
Caravan - Winter Wine
B
Jethro Tull - Life's a Long Song
Damn, tough match up. Two songs coming from similar places and doing it very very well.
Maybe A, by a shade of greyish pink.
A
Jonny Spencer wrote:fange wrote:I've got my quad pants on and i'm ready for some Cock.
By CHRIST you're a man after my own sideways sausage, Ange!
- Lord Rother
- Posts: 9990
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 11:54
- Location: breaking the legs of the bastard that got me framed
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
Clearly A
- lord_of_light88
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: 11 Feb 2008, 00:25
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
That Tull is a work of art. I mean, more than usual. Simple, but it builds subtly, masterfully.
Master Wanker
- never/ever
- Posts: 26478
- Joined: 27 Jun 2008, 14:21
- Location: Journeying through a burning brain
- never/ever
- Posts: 26478
- Joined: 27 Jun 2008, 14:21
- Location: Journeying through a burning brain
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
Neil Jung 11
Loki 10
Photo-finish? You're not wrong!
kath wrote:i do not wanna buy the world a fucquin gotdamn coke.
- C
- Robust
- Posts: 78998
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 19:06
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
Bloody 'ell what a close race - this has to be the most robustly seminal contest of ALL prog cup competitions
AWESOME!
Well done both (particularly the Jung lad) and bad luck Loki - very bad luck
This thread should go into 'classic threads'
Anybody that knows anything about prog/progressive/prog corner knows that this is the tightest round that could EVER exist
I'll contact the mods when the match closes
.
AWESOME!
Well done both (particularly the Jung lad) and bad luck Loki - very bad luck
This thread should go into 'classic threads'
Anybody that knows anything about prog/progressive/prog corner knows that this is the tightest round that could EVER exist
I'll contact the mods when the match closes
.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
- Loki
- The Goddess of Mischief
- Posts: 16204
- Joined: 18 Sep 2010, 06:34
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
whodathunkit wrote: Somewhere it's always 1972.
- Maryann
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: 13 Mar 2013, 11:42
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
B! B! B!, ya dumb rabbits!! ya cloth-eared galutes!! OOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHH!
- Neil Jung
- Watcher Of The Skies
- Posts: 11428
- Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 18:36
- Location: In the deepest ocean, bottom of the sea
- C
- Robust
- Posts: 78998
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 19:06
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
Neil Jung wrote:Ha!
Maryann wrote: dumb luck... all dumb luck
Mike- you lucky bugger
Yes, you jammy. flukey,lucky, lucky bugger
.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
- Neil Jung
- Watcher Of The Skies
- Posts: 11428
- Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 18:36
- Location: In the deepest ocean, bottom of the sea
Re: PP 2014 Round 2 Match 10
Luck dear boy? I think not.
Actually I submitted my list thinking it would compete as a whole list, not on a track by track basis, so it is not as strong as it might have been.
Actually I submitted my list thinking it would compete as a whole list, not on a track by track basis, so it is not as strong as it might have been.
“Erratic associate member”