To keep it interesting and not boring.
Otherwise you might aswell just put all lists against each other in round 1 and get people to vote for the best one there and then.
- Goat Boy
- Bogarting the joint
- Posts: 30446
- Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
- Location: In the perfumed garden
BlueMeanie wrote:The Modernist wrote:I get what Chris is saying, I'm not too bothered about them being highlighted because I agree with MM that it's about the list as a whole rather than elevating some tracks above others. However I am getting fed up of seeing lists that have only changed one song, it's got the feel of pulling a fast one. Next year I'd like to see stipulated a minimum of three changes.
Be interesting to see whether those lists continue with that tactic.
Though it's tempting to change more, why change a winning list too much?
I think for the sakes of the competition we should have a minimum number of changes each round. Looking at the lists on the semis it just all feels a bit stale now.
German Dave wrote:Have a long hard look in the mirror will you