
ie constituitionally, or party politically
The Dríver wrote:We even have village idiots.
Deebank wrote:No one voted for the Liberal Dems to have them prop up a lame duck Conservative minority Govt, that is for certain.
If he does betray his voters, it will come back to haunt him... especially if they don't budge on PR - and they won't will they.
yomptepi wrote:You have accept that some torys will have voted Lib Dem to keep Labour out as well you know. Tactical voting is not a one way street, altho the terminal arrogance of the average Labour voter would have you believe it is.
kewl klive wrote:A deluxe Sandinista! was pulled when only one outtake could be found.
Clint Planet wrote:yomptepi wrote:You have accept that some torys will have voted Lib Dem to keep Labour out as well you know. Tactical voting is not a one way street, altho the terminal arrogance of the average Labour voter would have you believe it is.
We're only arrogant because we're cleverer than you.
Kid P wrote:Clint Planet wrote:yomptepi wrote:You have accept that some torys will have voted Lib Dem to keep Labour out as well you know. Tactical voting is not a one way street, altho the terminal arrogance of the average Labour voter would have you believe it is.
We're only arrogant because we're cleverer than you.
It's funny 'cause it's true
And I didn't even pas my 11 pluss
The Dríver wrote:We even have village idiots.
yomptepi wrote:Deebank wrote:No one voted for the Liberal Dems to have them prop up a lame duck Conservative minority Govt, that is for certain.
If he does betray his voters, it will come back to haunt him... especially if they don't budge on PR - and they won't will they.
More dumb arrogance.
How can you possibly assume that no Lib dem voter would rather the torys to Labour. That is absurd. There are political veiws that are not yours you know.
Kid P wrote:
And I didn't even pas my 11 pluss
Beaten to it by Mick.the hanging monkey wrote:The answer is nobody knows yet, he hasn't actually done anything other than open a dialogue - which is a sensible move IMO.
Betty Denim wrote:And, quite frankly, if I had been raped and you said to me 'well yeah, it's crap innit; it's like that time I had to have a turnip curry' I'd do more than insult you.
Oscar47 wrote:I think this is an ethical and effective strategy. He has said his preference is with the party with majority vote because this is the democratic thing to do - to respect the people's choice. I think wherever he lays his hat he will be able to build the profile of the party and certainly of himself as a leader. I'd like to see the lib-dems get a bit of a chance because we always tend to judge them without having much if any actual experience of how they would run the country. The only reason I voted for the Lib-Dems is because they had comparitively very little involvement with the expenses scandal. And this is why I would never vote for Labour (or Tory) ever again as long as they continue to harbour the scum. Policy-wise, I think they all have things to offer and there's no clear winner for me.
Deebank wrote:yomptepi wrote:Deebank wrote:No one voted for the Liberal Dems to have them prop up a lame duck Conservative minority Govt, that is for certain.
If he does betray his voters, it will come back to haunt him... especially if they don't budge on PR - and they won't will they.
More dumb arrogance.
How can you possibly assume that no Lib dem voter would rather the torys to Labour. That is absurd. There are political veiws that are not yours you know.
Dumb? Given that Liberal policy is more 'left' than Labour these days, it's not such a massive assumption is it.
Deebank wrote:yomptepi wrote:Deebank wrote:No one voted for the Liberal Dems to have them prop up a lame duck Conservative minority Govt, that is for certain.
If he does betray his voters, it will come back to haunt him... especially if they don't budge on PR - and they won't will they.
More dumb arrogance.
How can you possibly assume that no Lib dem voter would rather the torys to Labour. That is absurd. There are political veiws that are not yours you know.
Dumb? Given that Liberal policy is more 'left' than Labour these days, it's not such a massive assumption is it.
corporate whore wrote:But then, 10M people appear to want to live in a police state.
yomptepi wrote:You need to make the question clear Wolfie.
A traitor to whom?