You've been trotting out this list of insulting characterisations in it must be close to 100 posts now. Have you ever thought of varying it? Personally, I have never been one to trot out stock insults, as I believe that doing so reveals far more about the insulter than the insultee
henchman - A faithful follower or political supporter, especially one prepared to engage in crime or violence by way of service. A bit strong, don't you think?
Your idea of what constitutes a bully-boy is a bit wide of the mark, too.
No-one is crying, either
And 'sycophants' - it is to laugh - no-one on preludin is remotely a suck-up, to Coan, or anyone else. Quite the opposite, in fact, bunch of rowdy iconoclasts
So the cap definitely does not fit, and I shall continue to post in good faith on both boards, as I have always done.
I know that some, including you, don't like me, often with good reason, but that's no reason for someone to attempt to bully me, or others, off a board to which I have made some positive contributions and where I have forge some genuine internet friendships (and no, they're not all on preludin either). And incidentally, don't you think it odd that someone like Paul Argles should account me his best mate if I am indeed as heinous as you characterize me? Paul and Ferd/Marguerite pass on their best to you, by the way.
And stir up trouble? Jimbo, not a preludiner, started this thread, Snee made a humorous post, er, that's it.
In timeless moments we live forever
You can't play a tune on an absolute
Negative Capability...when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact & reason”