Ban Jimbo?

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks

Ban Jimbo?

No
12
26%
Yes
32
70%
Footy
2
4%
 
Total votes: 46

Jimbo
Dribbling idiot airhead
Posts: 18043
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Ban Jimbo?

Postby Jimbo » 10 Sep 2020, 16:27

I say no. Jimbo is a font of amusement and enlightening alternative information. And he's about the only one who starts any threads here. Do you see how many views his corona virus thread gets? A lot more than there are BCB members. Actual outsiders are checking us out! And what he wrote about Kath I think was pretty funny and apt considering what she had said first. So no. :D
kath wrote: *which is the real reason he can fucque off and rot for the rest of time.

Jimbo wrote: So Kath, put on your puka love beads ... Then go fuque yourself.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 69077
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Diamond Dog » 10 Sep 2020, 16:33

Jimbo wrote:I say no. Jimbo is a font of amusement and enlightening alternative information. And he's about the only one who starts any threads here. Do you see how many views his corona virus thread gets? A lot more than there are BCB members. Actual outsiders are checking us out! And what he wrote about Kath I think was pretty funny and apt considering what she had said first. So no. :D


You're seriously unfunny and delusional.
I have put the ignorant, inflammatory bore on ignore.

User avatar
Sam Stone
Posts: 2145
Joined: 25 Aug 2016, 17:12

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Sam Stone » 10 Sep 2020, 17:27

If you'd like to tell how seriously unmoored from reality J has become, try reading his opening post in a Donald Trump accent.

Says it all really.

Six String
Posts: 21032
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:22

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Six String » 10 Sep 2020, 17:58

Yes, only our own little stable genius can fix BCB. :roll:

User avatar
Charlie O.
Posts: 41608
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Charlie O. » 10 Sep 2020, 18:32

Jimbo wrote:Do you see how many views his corona virus thread gets? A lot more than there are BCB members. Actual outsiders are checking us out!

Sadly typical Jimbo deduction. J, you do know that every time one of us clicks on the thread to read the latest post it adds to the number, right? And if they take the time to post something pointing out how pathetically delusional you are, that adds to the number, too?
Image

User avatar
toomanyhatz
Power-mad king of the WCC
Posts: 28801
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby toomanyhatz » 10 Sep 2020, 19:28

Jimbo wrote:Jimbo is a font of amusement


Occasionally, I guess...

and enlightening alternative information.


Enlightening? Pretty huge stretch. I guess it's enlightening to see just how convoluted the knots he's willing to tie himself into to land at the desired confirmation bias. But it started repeating itself quite a while ago.

And he's about the only one who starts any threads here.


There's a lull on the board for sure - there's a lull in this kind of board all told, in fact - but that's a) not true and b) nothing to brag about considering the quality of some of the threads. Strange that a music board doesn't seem to talk about music much anymore, but here we are. I wish Jimbo (or anyone) would start a music thread or something.

And what he wrote about Kath I think was pretty funny and apt considering what she had said first.


When your response to being (cleverly, imo, but your mileage will vary) insulted is to respond with sexist cliche, umm...no.

I apologize to anyone offended by me bringing up the whole banning notion (well, it wasn't me that brought it up, I was the one who made it public). I see we are not in favor. Just thought maybe, just maybe, it would cause him to have a little self-reflection and maybe choose his battles a little more carefully. How naive I was (am).
Jimbo wrote:I need you to back up this claim.


1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020? 2021?

User avatar
The Prof
Trading coffee in Abyssinia
Posts: 45947
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 18:32
Location: A Metropolis of Discontent

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby The Prof » 10 Sep 2020, 20:07

Once the vote gets to 100, ownership of BCB is passed onto Jimbo.

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 13826
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Sneelock » 10 Sep 2020, 20:18

Hello all you civilized people.

I know "banning" is an unpleasant thought and most of us consider ourselves above that sort of thing.
I'm sure there are people voting "no" using this very reasoning. you don't think his posts are "enlightening" and you don't think his response to kath was clever but "banning" just isn't the sort of thing you go in for.

well, how about this...
even if you DON'T want to ban Jimbo, won't you think of voting "yes"?
why? well, why the fuck not? it probably won't get him banned anyway but maybe it will put a couple of dents in that little tin-foil halo of his.

SO..
look in your heart. maybe you'd like to whop Jimbo upside the head with a sock full of shit. maybe you'd like to take a tray of ice cubes and pour them down the front of his pants. maybe you'd just like him to not sit up quite so tall in his chair the next time he posts.

Vote YES on Proposition JIMBO
.
I am Sneelock and I approve this message.
Last edited by Sneelock on 10 Sep 2020, 20:25, edited 2 times in total.
Inka Dinka Doo

User avatar
toomanyhatz
Power-mad king of the WCC
Posts: 28801
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby toomanyhatz » 10 Sep 2020, 20:23

Very persuasive, Snee.

It's just gotten a little closer.
Jimbo wrote:I need you to back up this claim.


1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020? 2021?

User avatar
kath
Groovy Queen of the Cosmos
Posts: 38714
Joined: 22 Feb 2006, 15:20
Location: new orleans via bama via new orleans

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby kath » 10 Sep 2020, 20:34

(sends sneelock a dollar in the mail. wonders if she can deduct it on her taxes.)

Jimbo
Dribbling idiot airhead
Posts: 18043
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Jimbo » 11 Sep 2020, 00:43

Thanks to the turncoats at Preludin for upping the no votes.
kath wrote: *which is the real reason he can fucque off and rot for the rest of time.

Jimbo wrote: So Kath, put on your puka love beads ... Then go fuque yourself.

User avatar
Charlie O.
Posts: 41608
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Charlie O. » 11 Sep 2020, 01:26

Ah, the Preludin conspiracy - that's a good one.
Image

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 13826
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Sneelock » 11 Sep 2020, 01:36

my sources tell me that it was the sock full of shit upside the head that made the difference.
Inka Dinka Doo

User avatar
Mike Boom
Posts: 3266
Joined: 02 Sep 2005, 03:49

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Mike Boom » 11 Sep 2020, 02:13

Jimbo wrote:And what he wrote about Kath I think was pretty funny and apt considering what she had said first.


Funny ?
Your pathetic and a sorry ass excuse for a man and you disgust me.

Jimbo
Dribbling idiot airhead
Posts: 18043
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Jimbo » 11 Sep 2020, 02:41

Mike Boom wrote:
Jimbo wrote:And what he wrote about Kath I think was pretty funny and apt considering what she had said first.


Funny ?
Your pathetic and a sorry ass excuse for a man and you disgust me.


So that's a yes. Thank you.
kath wrote: *which is the real reason he can fucque off and rot for the rest of time.

Jimbo wrote: So Kath, put on your puka love beads ... Then go fuque yourself.

User avatar
Mike Boom
Posts: 3266
Joined: 02 Sep 2005, 03:49

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Mike Boom » 11 Sep 2020, 02:53

Your not worth banning.

User avatar
Sam Stone
Posts: 2145
Joined: 25 Aug 2016, 17:12

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Sam Stone » 11 Sep 2020, 08:19

Did I vote to ban J?

No. Have never voted - and will never vote - in polls iike this because the number of aliases on the board mean such votes are both worthless and unnecessarily divisive.

Would I be sorry to see the back of him?

No. Ultimately, J's consistently cynical and insensitive trolling has forced many BCBers off the board for good.

Rather than ban this pathetic specimen why don't we all finally do the sensible thing and deprive him of the attention that he so desperately craves by ignoring his witless conspiracy theorising?

User avatar
GoogaMooga
custodian of oldies
Posts: 26809
Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
Location: Denmark

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby GoogaMooga » 11 Sep 2020, 10:51

It should be easy enough to skip things that offend or annoy you. I don't have a beef with Jimbo. He insulted me once, but I don't think he really meant it. When you are on the same board for so many years, it can happen. No big deal.
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck

User avatar
Flower
Posts: 8509
Joined: 05 Mar 2009, 22:22
Location: Unlisted

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Flower » 11 Sep 2020, 14:20

Dry Idea would work better. Don't know if it is available in Japan.

Image
If love could've saved you, you would've lived forever.

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 30621
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: Ban Jimbo?

Postby Matt Wilson » 11 Sep 2020, 16:02

If Jimbo were banned, The Preludins would have nothing to talk about on their BCB thread.