Megxit

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Samoan
Posts: 11064
Joined: 28 May 2008, 10:22
Location: The Glad Tidings Mission Hall

Re: Megxit

Postby Samoan » 13 Jan 2020, 12:47

Does nobody think there's the Hint of the Hustle* about her ?

Just throwing that out there for consideration.




(*that might make a good name for a marketable fragrance..)

User avatar
KeithPratt
Arsehole all Erect
Posts: 23813
Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
Contact:

Re: Megxit

Postby KeithPratt » 13 Jan 2020, 12:54

That's the unfortunate narrative isnt it. And it is inevitable.

"She's been divorced and she's American"


"She's mixed race so anyone who criticises her is a massive racist"


Personally I've got no qualms about what they do. But I do think they should have given it a longer time frame in which to go about it. It's understandable because they have a very young son and that sense of permanence and settlement is extremely important. On the other hand, deep down both of them must know that this is no ordinary marriage and no ordinary family.

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 24016
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: Insanity filled foxhole

Re: Megxit

Postby Deebank » 13 Jan 2020, 12:56

KeithPratt wrote:It all started when they started banging on about climate change and became overtly political.
.


Absolute cobblers.

Charles has been banging his own particular drums for decades (architecture, environment, organic farming etc), no more or less political really.

To answer Minnie's question. why I think the media is particularly arsed about Megan Markle - it is because she is:

American
Black
A holywwod celeb

in no particular order - I suspect different ones rankle different people.
I've been talking about writing a book - 25 years of TEFL - for a few years now. I've got it in me.

Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro

User avatar
Geezee
Posts: 12563
Joined: 24 Jul 2003, 10:14
Location: Where joy divides into vision

Re: Megxit

Postby Geezee » 13 Jan 2020, 13:11

KeithPratt wrote:That's the unfortunate narrative isnt it. And it is inevitable.

"She's been divorced and she's American"


"She's mixed race so anyone who criticises her is a massive racist"


A narrative that one of course creates for oneself, in the same way that anyone who is anti-zionist suddenly becomes an anti-semite, if that's how you chose to see the world.
Smilies are ON
Flash is OFF
Url is ON

Sam Stone
Posts: 1876
Joined: 25 Aug 2016, 17:12

Re: Megxit

Postby Sam Stone » 13 Jan 2020, 13:13

Deebank wrote:
KeithPratt wrote:
It all started when they started banging on about climate change and became overtly political.



Absolute cobblers.

Charles has been banging his own particular drums for decades (architecture, environment, organic farming etc), no more or less political really.




And of course the press and public give Chazza such an easy ride over his talking to plants, his footman's having to cook him something like 15 eggs for breakfast each morning and his pathetic need to pack his own toilet seat whenever he visits friends houses.

Deebank wrote:
To answer Minnie's question. why I think the media is particularly arsed about Megan Markle - it is because she is:

American
Black
A holywwod celeb

in no particular order - I suspect different ones rankle different people.


In addition to all of the moans outlined above, some would argue it's more a case of her coming across as a cold and calculating person who has a habit of dumping people once they've outlived their usefulness.

One only has to look at the sad sight of Ginge hassling the Disney big wig to give Winge some Voice Over work to see who wears the provebial trousers in that soon-to-be-ex-Royal Household.

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 13620
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Megxit

Postby The Modernist » 13 Jan 2020, 15:24

KeithPratt wrote:It all started when they started banging on about climate change and became overtly political.

The Royals don't do politics. That's not their job. They are public servants who carry out roles - but not political ones.


And not relevant ones for the 21st century either. If they want to have any relevance at all, then they're going to have to do more than cut ribbons.

User avatar
harvey k-tel
Long Player
Posts: 40684
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: Megxit

Postby harvey k-tel » 13 Jan 2020, 16:21

What will Sussex do without a duke?
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 24016
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: Insanity filled foxhole

Re: Megxit

Postby Deebank » 13 Jan 2020, 18:25

harvey k-tel wrote:What will Sussex do without a duke?


Which one? :?
I've been talking about writing a book - 25 years of TEFL - for a few years now. I've got it in me.

Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro

User avatar
harvey k-tel
Long Player
Posts: 40684
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: Megxit

Postby harvey k-tel » 13 Jan 2020, 18:29

Which one is he the duke of?
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
Samoan
Posts: 11064
Joined: 28 May 2008, 10:22
Location: The Glad Tidings Mission Hall

Re: Megxit

Postby Samoan » 13 Jan 2020, 18:35

I think Deebank means that there are 2 English counties, East Sussex and West Sussex.

Sussex is now an imaginary fantasy place, (officially an historic county) - and How!

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 24016
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: Insanity filled foxhole

Re: Megxit

Postby Deebank » 13 Jan 2020, 19:04

harvey k-tel wrote:Which one is he the duke of?


Good question!

I have lived in both and was never aware of being in a duchy.
I've been talking about writing a book - 25 years of TEFL - for a few years now. I've got it in me.

Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro

User avatar
GoogaMooga
custodian of oldies
Posts: 26589
Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
Location: Denmark

Re: Megxit

Postby GoogaMooga » 13 Jan 2020, 19:06

"I won't bail out Fergie!"
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 24016
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: Insanity filled foxhole

Re: Megxit

Postby Deebank » 13 Jan 2020, 19:12

Dp
I've been talking about writing a book - 25 years of TEFL - for a few years now. I've got it in me.

Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro

User avatar
harvey k-tel
Long Player
Posts: 40684
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: Megxit

Postby harvey k-tel » 13 Jan 2020, 19:27

Greta Thumberg wrote:I think Deebank means that there are 2 English counties, East Sussex and West Sussex.

Sussex is now an imaginary fantasy place, (officially an historic county) - and How!


Thank you for Samoansplaining.

;)
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

Sam Stone
Posts: 1876
Joined: 25 Aug 2016, 17:12

Re: Megxit

Postby Sam Stone » 14 Jan 2020, 12:28

Oh, dear, despite all their high-performing (and one imagines highly paid support staff) as of last Thursday, Ginge and Whinge still hadn't appplied to trademark Sussex Royal in the US. Now someone else has nipped in and looks like having beaten them to it.

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 16202
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: Megxit

Postby bobzilla77 » 17 Jan 2020, 20:59

I can appreciate that if they want out, they need to get all the way out including giving the money back. I gave been kind of shocked looking at the a/b of how they are being covered. The weirdest was one that said Megan's wedding bouquet could have killed her bridesmaids because it had Lily of the valley in it. Granted, I know the deadly potential of that flower because I watch Breaking Bad. But the same flower was in Kate's bouquet too and no one went to the hospital.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53473
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: Megxit

Postby Snarfyguy » 18 Jan 2020, 03:42

bobzilla77 wrote:I'm not sure I totally comprehend what's going on here. Im aware the right wing press don't like her. In that case, shouldn't they be pleased Meg and Harry
are getting out of the crown game? Were those people just assholes who were going to bag on her no matter what they did?

I find it hard to summon any feelings at all about English royals. But I kind of like it that someone is turning their back on the idea without their hand bring forced by scandal.

Haven't even bothered to read the thread & am barely conversant on the subject, but I think there's an inherent scandal in her being a person of color (somehow) in the first place.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 17582
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Megxit

Postby Jimbo » 18 Jan 2020, 06:38

On the treadmill today I determined that if we get a dog and it's a female we'll call her Duchess and if it's male he's gotta be Duke.
You don't have to be smart to see how fucked up this shit is. Jimmy Dore

User avatar
Samoan
Posts: 11064
Joined: 28 May 2008, 10:22
Location: The Glad Tidings Mission Hall

Re: Megxit

Postby Samoan » 19 Jan 2020, 14:21

The hard Megxit

If you have the audacity to try to hustle Queen Elizabeth II, it's not going to work - she's seen it and been through it all before in one way or another

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/18/harry-meghan-buckingham-palace-deal-analysis

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/19/hard-megxit-uk-papers-revel-in-harry-and-meghans-royal-dismissal

User avatar
yomptepi
BCB thumbscrew of Justice
Posts: 36076
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 17:57
Location: well

Re: Megxit

Postby yomptepi » 19 Jan 2020, 16:12

Off with their heads. Grasping parasitic cunts.
You don't like me...do you?