Democrat candidates so far. . .

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 17147
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Jimbo » 05 Feb 2020, 01:05

Behind the app that delayed Iowa’s voting results is a dark money operation funded by anti-Bernie Sanders billionaires. Its top donor Seth Klarman is a Buttigieg backer who has dumped money into pro-settler Israel lobby groups.

By Max Blumenthal

.....As Democratic elites like the Sussmans braced for a Bernie Sanders triumph in Iowa, a mysterious piece of technology spun out by a group they supported delayed the vote results, preventing Sanders from delivering a victory speech.

And the politician many of them supported, Pete Buttigieg, exploited the moment to declare himself the winner.

In such a strange scenario, the conspiracy theories write themselves.
Civilization can never be taken for granted. Thierry Meyssan

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 17147
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Jimbo » 05 Feb 2020, 21:55

Go Mayor Pete! Kicking butts in Iowa and next he'll be kicking 'em in New Hampshire. President Pete. I like the sound of that.
Civilization can never be taken for granted. Thierry Meyssan

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39504
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Count Machuki » 06 Feb 2020, 02:55

Jimbo wrote:Go Mayor Pete! Kicking butts in Iowa and next he'll be kicking 'em in New Hampshire. President Pete. I like the sound of that.


Jimbo, at least Jimbo properly if you're gonna Jimbo, ffs

https://fortune.com/2019/10/24/pete-but ... -business/

https://www.commondreams.org/views/2019 ... orate-tool
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

Powehi
Posts: 1385
Joined: 25 Aug 2016, 17:12

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Powehi » 06 Feb 2020, 09:01

Get set for four more years of the orange buffoon (assuming humanity lasts that long).

The Dems have fucked themselves every which way from Sunday with their wreckless impeachment, disastrous mismanagement in Iowa and Nancy Pelosi's playing right into Trump's hands with her on-screen ripping up of the SotU address.

User avatar
Still Baron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 43801
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Still Baron » 06 Feb 2020, 14:15

I don’t think the impeachment was reckless. I think it was necessary. I also don’t think Pelosi’s actions will factor in much, if at all, in the election.

The troublesome issue is the candidates.
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

Powehi
Posts: 1385
Joined: 25 Aug 2016, 17:12

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Powehi » 06 Feb 2020, 16:58

Still Baron wrote:I don’t think the impeachment was reckless. I think it was necessary. I also don’t think Pelosi’s actions will factor in much, if at all, in the election.

The troublesome issue is the candidates.


To paraphrase your missus, you come at the Quim, you better not miss...

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 17147
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Jimbo » 07 Feb 2020, 03:25

The Myth Of Incompetence: DNC Scandals Are A Feature, Not A Bug
Caitlin Johnstone

The flaw in this expectation is its premise that Democratic Party elites care if their party wins in November. They do not.

https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/the- ... 264352d4f7

Caitlin nails it hard again.

At this time it looks, however, like Bernie has won in Iowa. Is it official? I don't know but had Bernie not had the overwhelming numbers of supporters he'd have lost. Let's just see what shenanigans await progressives in New Hampshire.
Civilization can never be taken for granted. Thierry Meyssan

Powehi
Posts: 1385
Joined: 25 Aug 2016, 17:12

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Powehi » 08 Feb 2020, 14:38

Jimbo wrote:

...it looks like Bernie has won in Iowa...had Bernie not had the overwhelming numbers
of supporters he'd have lost.



Cheers, J. Bet they don't get this level of tell-it-like-it-is political analysis over at Preludin!

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 68685
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Diamond Dog » 08 Feb 2020, 15:01

Powehi wrote:
Jimbo wrote:

...it looks like Bernie has won in Iowa...had Bernie not had the overwhelming numbers
of supporters he'd have lost.



Cheers, J. Bet they don't get this level of tell-it-like-it-is political analysis over at Preludin!


And he even managed to get that wrong.

Pete Buttigieg 26.2%
Sanders 26.1%
Warren 18%
Biden 15.8%
Klobuchar 12.3%
Yang 1.0%
And I chop it down with the edge of my hand
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
This is where we walked,This is where we swam, Take a picture here,Take a souvenir

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 17147
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Jimbo » 09 Feb 2020, 01:33

Diamond Dog wrote:
Powehi wrote:
Jimbo wrote:

...it looks like Bernie has won in Iowa...had Bernie not had the overwhelming numbers
of supporters he'd have lost.



Cheers, J. Bet they don't get this level of tell-it-like-it-is political analysis over at Preludin!


And he even managed to get that wrong.

Pete Buttigieg 26.2%
Sanders 26.1%
Warren 18%
Biden 15.8%
Klobuchar 12.3%
Yang 1.0%


Despite what you read in the lying, unquestioning, roll-over and play dead news, do you seriously believe that Buttigieg got more votes than Sanders? Even you can't be that naive. When I say that Sanders numbers were overwhelming I mean there were - and had to be - so many voters for him that there could be no dispute. All the polls said Sanders. And even then the cheating Democratic scumbags placed that CIA shill Buttigieg at the top. How dumb must you be to so unabashedly and uncritically criticize my post. Yeah, maybe some shitheel somewhere says Buttigieg squeaked by but phuck dat shit. Sanders won and you know it. :roll:
Civilization can never be taken for granted. Thierry Meyssan

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39504
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Count Machuki » 09 Feb 2020, 04:45

On Wednesday you loved "CIA Shill" Mayor Pete, Jimbo.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 17147
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Jimbo » 09 Feb 2020, 05:34

Count Machuki wrote:On Wednesday you loved "CIA Shill" Mayor Pete, Jimbo.


I was trying for irony. I don't like him at all.
Fun fact: the most dangerous synthetic material ever invented in a laboratory for public consumption is Pete Buttigieg.
Civilization can never be taken for granted. Thierry Meyssan

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 68685
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Diamond Dog » 09 Feb 2020, 07:45

Jimbo wrote:
Diamond Dog wrote:
Powehi wrote:
Cheers, J. Bet they don't get this level of tell-it-like-it-is political analysis over at Preludin!


And he even managed to get that wrong.

Pete Buttigieg 26.2%
Sanders 26.1%
Warren 18%
Biden 15.8%
Klobuchar 12.3%
Yang 1.0%


Despite what you read in the lying, unquestioning, roll-over and play dead news, do you seriously believe that Buttigieg got more votes than Sanders? Even you can't be that naive. When I say that Sanders numbers were overwhelming I mean there were - and had to be - so many voters for him that there could be no dispute. All the polls said Sanders. And even then the cheating Democratic scumbags placed that CIA shill Buttigieg at the top. How dumb must you be to so unabashedly and uncritically criticize my post. Yeah, maybe some shitheel somewhere says Buttigieg squeaked by but phuck dat shit. Sanders won and you know it. :roll:


Jeez.... :lol: :lol:

Where I come from from 26.2 is always larger than 26.1 but it seems where I come from has had that wrong all along. Sigh.
And I chop it down with the edge of my hand
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
This is where we walked,This is where we swam, Take a picture here,Take a souvenir

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39504
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Count Machuki » 11 Feb 2020, 19:16

Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39504
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Count Machuki » 12 Feb 2020, 01:57

We're now Yangless, I understand?
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Still Baron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 43801
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Still Baron » 12 Feb 2020, 02:10

So my phone says!
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39504
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Count Machuki » 12 Feb 2020, 02:14

Man, I was gonna buy a whole mess of drugs with my Yangbucks, too. What a bummer.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39504
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: Democrat candidates so far. . .

Postby Count Machuki » 12 Feb 2020, 02:30

Oh, Biden. He's talking race in SC. He's just so embarrassing and desperate.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D