MEN'S TROUSERS

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
hippopotamus
Posts: 937
Joined: 22 Dec 2015, 11:00

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby hippopotamus » 12 Jun 2018, 13:41

5 pages.
Diamond Dog wrote:
nev gash wrote:What is point?


Indeed, what is point?

User avatar
LeBaron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 42901
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby LeBaron » 12 Jun 2018, 20:09

We were in New York City earlier in the spring and I was deeply dismayed to see grown(ish) men actually wearing what appeared to be very nice suits with the pant legs cut very short to make for conspicuous high waters. I thought that shit only existed in magazines and maybe, at a stretch, Italy. It was all over midtown. What a world. I guess I’m old.
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Wally Bingbang
Long Player
Posts: 39835
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Wally Bingbang » 12 Jun 2018, 20:52

LeBaron wrote:We were in New York City earlier in the spring and I was deeply dismayed to see grown(ish) men actually wearing what appeared to be very nice suits with the pant legs cut very short to make for conspicuous high waters. I thought that shit only existed in magazines and maybe, at a stretch, Italy. It was all over midtown. What a world. I guess I’m old.


I think they do that to show off their socks. Soon enough they'll be cutting the arses out so you can see their fancy underwears.
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
LeBaron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 42901
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby LeBaron » 12 Jun 2018, 20:53

Harvey K-Tel wrote:
LeBaron wrote:We were in New York City earlier in the spring and I was deeply dismayed to see grown(ish) men actually wearing what appeared to be very nice suits with the pant legs cut very short to make for conspicuous high waters. I thought that shit only existed in magazines and maybe, at a stretch, Italy. It was all over midtown. What a world. I guess I’m old.


I think they do that to show off their socks. Soon enough they'll be cutting the arses out so you can see their fancy underwears.


Would you believe some of these assholes weren’t wearing socks!?
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Wally Bingbang
Long Player
Posts: 39835
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Wally Bingbang » 12 Jun 2018, 20:54

LeBaron wrote:
Harvey K-Tel wrote:
LeBaron wrote:We were in New York City earlier in the spring and I was deeply dismayed to see grown(ish) men actually wearing what appeared to be very nice suits with the pant legs cut very short to make for conspicuous high waters. I thought that shit only existed in magazines and maybe, at a stretch, Italy. It was all over midtown. What a world. I guess I’m old.


I think they do that to show off their socks. Soon enough they'll be cutting the arses out so you can see their fancy underwears.


Would you believe some of these assholes weren’t wearing socks!?


We'd better hope that they wear underwear, then.
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 52833
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Snarfyguy » 12 Jun 2018, 20:56

^^^ That's a gay thing here. Or like a sub-demographic of professional young gay men who are somewhere on the spectrum of art and commerce.

EDIT: I really don't get the no-sock thing.
Last edited by Snarfyguy on 12 Jun 2018, 20:59, edited 1 time in total.
Jimbo wrote:Look, all I know is pretty much what I get from Robert Parry over at Consortium News.

User avatar
sloopjohnc
Posts: 62586
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby sloopjohnc » 12 Jun 2018, 20:58

LeBaron wrote:We were in New York City earlier in the spring and I was deeply dismayed to see grown(ish) men actually wearing what appeared to be very nice suits with the pant legs cut very short to make for conspicuous high waters. I thought that shit only existed in magazines and maybe, at a stretch, Italy. It was all over midtown. What a world. I guess I’m old.


Our demographic is why Dockers were invented.

User avatar
Wally Bingbang
Long Player
Posts: 39835
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Wally Bingbang » 12 Jun 2018, 20:58

Fuck Dockers.
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
kalowski II: The Revenge
wannabee enfant terrible
Posts: 16778
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: forever in Peter’s thoughts

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby kalowski II: The Revenge » 12 Jun 2018, 21:05

Easier if their arses are hanging out.
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.

Kal ‘Roger Cock’ Hodgson wrote:I have just discovered that the fake Markus account was not John...I would like to apologise for suggesting it was him.


User avatar
Wally Bingbang
Long Player
Posts: 39835
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Wally Bingbang » 12 Jun 2018, 21:08

Yes. but you can't just assume consent.
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
LeBaron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 42901
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby LeBaron » 12 Jun 2018, 21:09

Harvey K-Tel wrote:Fuck Dockers.


Yeah sloop, what Harvey said!
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
kalowski II: The Revenge
wannabee enfant terrible
Posts: 16778
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: forever in Peter’s thoughts

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby kalowski II: The Revenge » 12 Jun 2018, 21:10

PC gone mad.
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.

Kal ‘Roger Cock’ Hodgson wrote:I have just discovered that the fake Markus account was not John...I would like to apologise for suggesting it was him.


User avatar
sloopjohnc
Posts: 62586
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby sloopjohnc » 12 Jun 2018, 21:15

Harvey K-Tel wrote:Fuck Dockers.


Harvey K-Tel

Image

User avatar
Wally Bingbang
Long Player
Posts: 39835
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Wally Bingbang » 12 Jun 2018, 21:23

Jealous?
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
kalowski II: The Revenge
wannabee enfant terrible
Posts: 16778
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: forever in Peter’s thoughts

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby kalowski II: The Revenge » 12 Jun 2018, 21:24

No way is his arse that tanned.
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.

Kal ‘Roger Cock’ Hodgson wrote:I have just discovered that the fake Markus account was not John...I would like to apologise for suggesting it was him.


User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 52833
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Snarfyguy » 12 Jun 2018, 21:32

gash on ignore wrote:PC gone mad.

Computer problems?
Jimbo wrote:Look, all I know is pretty much what I get from Robert Parry over at Consortium News.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32252
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Goat Boy » 12 Jun 2018, 21:33

I've seen the no sock thing. Usually with loafers.

It's how I picture G these days
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:we have lost touch with anything normal

User avatar
sloopjohnc
Posts: 62586
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby sloopjohnc » 12 Jun 2018, 22:12

Harvey K-Tel wrote:Jealous?


Yeah, that's just the word I was looking for.

User avatar
Eddie Shah environment
hounds people off the board
Posts: 17982
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby Eddie Shah environment » 15 Aug 2018, 21:26

shorts, lads?
Dimbo wrote:The media are run by the CIA. They write what they tell them to write.

User avatar
PENK
Midnight to Six Man
Posts: 34584
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
Location: Stockholm

Re: MEN'S TROUSERS

Postby PENK » 15 Aug 2018, 21:32

CAN wrote:shorts, lads?


I spent most of the summer in shorts as it was 5,000,000,000 degrees most of the time. It was actually physically impossible to wear trousers. Against all medical advice.

I am a trouser man most of the time though. I started work - a new job - on Monday and have done one day in brown chinos and two in jeans (dark navy, regular fit, turned up a bit at the bottom). I usually just choose the trousers depending on what's going above them. I'm looking forward to the temperature dropping a bit so I can start with my favourite items of clothing, overshirts.
Copehead wrote:I have met Gruff Rhys - although he claimed he wasn't and that he couldn't speak Welsh, as I spoke to him in Welsh, but it was him lying bastard.