Diamond Dog wrote: Jimbo wrote:
Diamond Dog wrote:Well?
I was waiting, hoping someone else might chime in but no one else gives a shit. Oh well.
Incompetence does not explain how those buildings fell. And this latest study confirms that Building 7 did not collapse because of fire.
So you post a video you claim to have watched, someone responds challenging the video contents but you don't respond- you wait for someone else to chip in?
Of course what's doubly embarrassing for you is that said video deals with the movements of the Al Qaeda cell prior to 9/11, not the buildings structure (which is what you were pertaining to). So you didn't watch it, you don't have a response to my comment and...anyway.. it doesn't explain why the buildings fell?
Is it really any wonder that no body "gives a shit" what you post on here?
There is a Rashomon quality to the 9/11 story with at least three big narratives and any number of minor conspiracy theories. The first big one is the one told in the official 9/11 government report. Then there is the Laurence Wright incompetence theory which in many ways goes against the official story. And then there is the I don't know exactly what happened on 9/11 or who exactly is at fault but clearly what the government is saying is bogus. That is about where I am at these days.
And yes, I watched the video where the guy talks about granting visas to Saudis who should have been rejected but "somehow" were allowed into the US and whatdoyaknow, these were the very same 9/11 suspects. Is it incompetence or how lucky can a terrorist get? And they get luckier and luckier as we get more and more incompetent. Uh huh.
Did you watch the video of the guy saying the first explosion was in the basement? How could that have happened? Wright won't touch that, not if he wants his book reviewed in the NYT.
All the worst atrocities in human history have been perfectly legal. Caitlin Johnstone