"Me Jimbo. Me know truth."

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 15527
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: Skripal

Postby Belle Lettre » 13 Mar 2018, 10:08

Why not just attack them on the Belarus border? They'll fold up like a concertina!
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
Toby
Arsehole all Erect
Posts: 23146
Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
Contact:

Re: Skripal

Postby Toby » 13 Mar 2018, 10:08

It would not serve Russia's interests to attack anyone. Why would they? What have they got to gain from a conventional military conflict with Europe?

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 15527
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: Skripal

Postby Belle Lettre » 13 Mar 2018, 10:17

I meant the UK, in terms of the vast array of reprisals open to it against such a lame duck as you seem to think the Russians are.
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
Toby
Arsehole all Erect
Posts: 23146
Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
Contact:

Re: Skripal

Postby Toby » 13 Mar 2018, 10:24

The problem with this is that there is no conclusive proof that the Russian state was involved. Litvinenko was poisoned with Polonium (My old boss was in the Itsu cafe when the assassins met him). If they were state-sponsored assassins, then why are they still alive 5 days later?

I think if there is conclusive evidence that the Russian State was involved, then some sort of robust defence of what we are about needs to be demonstrated. Expelling a shitload of diplomats usually does the trick.

The overall issue in general though is that I think that the stance against Russia isn't particularly great, and this is where I side with Corbyn (for once). Peter Hitchens has gone on at length at how the NATO/EU provokes Russia continually, but because we are part of that alliance we tend to think of Russia as this expansionist menace. There is no doubt that Putin marshals a "sinister tyranny" where all sorts of human rights abuses go on, but whether it is the bogeyman that seeks to invade Europe is another story.

One of the arguments Hitchens puts forward is that NATO was set up as a robust defence against the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union. Neither of those things exists any more, so why is NATO still going?

User avatar
Toby
Arsehole all Erect
Posts: 23146
Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
Contact:

Re: Skripal

Postby Toby » 13 Mar 2018, 10:32



This is worth a watch. Hitchens, an ex-communist who lived in the Soviet Union for a few years, is one person I think who has a nuanced view of Russia today.

User avatar
PENK
Midnight to Six Man
Posts: 34581
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
Location: Stockholm

Re: Skripal

Postby PENK » 13 Mar 2018, 11:17

Where's Jimbo?
Copehead wrote:I have met Gruff Rhys - although he claimed he wasn't and that he couldn't speak Welsh, as I spoke to him in Welsh, but it was him lying bastard.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15268
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Skripal

Postby Jimbo » 13 Mar 2018, 12:49

PENK wrote:Where's Jimbo?



What you fall to realize is that Russia is Bizzaro world where up is down and nonsense is common sense. Putin figured at a time when tensions are at a peak between the west and Russia this would be a perfect time to sneak into Britain and attempt to assassinate a former Russian spy.
Gadfly

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 11719
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Skripal

Postby The Modernist » 13 Mar 2018, 13:00

Toby wrote:The problem with this is that there is no conclusive proof that the Russian state was involved.


Something of a relief to the British Government I'd have thought, because if there was conclusive proof what the fuck would you do about it as a response?

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 15527
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: Skripal

Postby Belle Lettre » 13 Mar 2018, 13:08

The White House avoids blaming the Russians.
Rex Tillerson says it looks as though it was the Russians.
Rex Tillerson has, apparently, just been fired.
Last edited by Belle Lettre on 13 Mar 2018, 13:11, edited 1 time in total.
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 11719
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Skripal

Postby The Modernist » 13 Mar 2018, 13:10

Belle Lettre wrote:Red Tillerson has, apparently, just been fired.


His christian name probably didn't help.

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 15527
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: Skripal

Postby Belle Lettre » 13 Mar 2018, 13:12

:lol:

:(
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
Eddie Shah environment
hounds people off the board
Posts: 17960
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: Skripal

Postby Eddie Shah environment » 13 Mar 2018, 13:15

The Modernist wrote:
Toby wrote:The problem with this is that there is no conclusive proof that the Russian state was involved.


Something of a relief to the British Government I'd have thought, because if there was conclusive proof what the fuck would you do about it as a response?


I'd love to know.

Nice to see people responding to the thread, finally. What took you?
Dimbo wrote:The media are run by the CIA. They write what they tell them to write.

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 15527
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: Skripal

Postby Belle Lettre » 13 Mar 2018, 13:18

And miss a chance to annoy you?
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
Eddie Shah environment
hounds people off the board
Posts: 17960
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: Skripal

Postby Eddie Shah environment » 13 Mar 2018, 13:19

:lol:

I'm too amused by this to be annoyed right now:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... rson-moron
Dimbo wrote:The media are run by the CIA. They write what they tell them to write.

User avatar
The Modernist
2018 BCB Cup Champ!
Posts: 11719
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Skripal

Postby The Modernist » 13 Mar 2018, 13:23

Toby wrote:
The overall issue in general though is that I think that the stance against Russia isn't particularly great, and this is where I side with Corbyn (for once). Peter Hitchens has gone on at length at how the NATO/EU provokes Russia continually, but because we are part of that alliance we tend to think of Russia as this expansionist menace. There is no doubt that Putin marshals a "sinister tyranny" where all sorts of human rights abuses go on, but whether it is the bogeyman that seeks to invade Europe is another story.

One of the arguments Hitchens puts forward is that NATO was set up as a robust defence against the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union. Neither of those things exists any more, so why is NATO still going?


Well he has invaded parts of Georgia and the Ukraine. The idea of Putin as an aggressor is hardly a chimera.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15268
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Skripal

Postby Jimbo » 13 Mar 2018, 13:29

The Modernist wrote:
Toby wrote:
The overall issue in general though is that I think that the stance against Russia isn't particularly great, and this is where I side with Corbyn (for once). Peter Hitchens has gone on at length at how the NATO/EU provokes Russia continually, but because we are part of that alliance we tend to think of Russia as this expansionist menace. There is no doubt that Putin marshals a "sinister tyranny" where all sorts of human rights abuses go on, but whether it is the bogeyman that seeks to invade Europe is another story.

One of the arguments Hitchens puts forward is that NATO was set up as a robust defence against the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union. Neither of those things exists any more, so why is NATO still going?


Well he has invaded parts of Georgia and the Ukraine. The idea of Putin as an aggressor is hardly a chimera.


:roll:
Gadfly

User avatar
Toby
Arsehole all Erect
Posts: 23146
Joined: 28 Jul 2003, 23:13
Contact:

Re: Skripal

Postby Toby » 13 Mar 2018, 14:08

No-one doubts that he is aggressive. But the crucial thing for us to understand is that a full-blown conventional conflict is not in his interests as much as it is ours. The Russian economy simply couldn't handle it.

NATO has expanded to include most of the EU countries and wants Ukraine too, a former part of the Soviet Union. There is much evidence (again Hitchens is good on this) to suggest that the EU/NATO helped engineer the recent coup in Ukraine that led to the establishment of a new government. How do you think that Russia feels when the most powerful military alliance in the world, one solely created to face down the Soviet Union, is right on its doorstep?

Can you imagine what the reaction might have been if Russia was found to have engineered the recent Catalan independence referendum?

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15268
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Skripal

Postby Jimbo » 13 Mar 2018, 15:20

Toby wrote:No-one doubts that he is aggressive.


After that litany of American interventions why mention it?

I think his latest roll out of new weapons is to say to NATO you can try but it'll cost you a lot. That's not aggression that's a smart defence.
Gadfly

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 52828
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: Skripal

Postby Snarfyguy » 13 Mar 2018, 15:54

Toby wrote:The problem with this is that there is no conclusive proof that the Russian state was involved.

No. But who else wanted him dead?
Jimbo wrote:Look, all I know is pretty much what I get from Robert Parry over at Consortium News.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15268
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Skripal

Postby Jimbo » 13 Mar 2018, 16:07

Image
Gadfly