Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks

Keep the monarchy?

Yes - they are personally important to me and must stay.
5
13%
No - they are irrelevant to me and serve no purpose. Give it a year and they won't be missed.
26
67%
Couldn't give a stuff either way.
8
21%
 
Total votes: 39

User avatar
Thang-y
Posts: 1000
Joined: 29 Apr 2016, 17:59
Contact:

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Thang-y » 05 Dec 2017, 16:30

Oh and the other day German Dave posted on here chiding someone for taking the piss on this thread and suggesting it not being encouraging to newcomers (or words along those lines). He then deleted it. I said on the sexual assault thread that I'd post this here too: don't stop on my account. There is an ignore function. Besides, over there and on this thread there were valid points coming from it.

User avatar
The Prof
Composing a revolutionary symphony
Posts: 44967
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 18:32
Location: A Metropolis of Discontent

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby The Prof » 05 Dec 2017, 16:40

Thang-y wrote:
The Prof wrote:There's plenty more stuff to get angry about.


I don't think most republicans are angry at all, despite the privileges of the unelected subject matter,


I wouldn't be to sure about that. I just saw Pete this afternoon.

Image

he's FURIOUS.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 65249
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Diamond Dog » 05 Dec 2017, 17:09

:lol:
Image

Mason Cooley wrote:Worried about being a dull fellow? You might develop your talent for being irritating.

User avatar
nev gash
cultural defective
Posts: 15505
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: jouissance

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby nev gash » 05 Dec 2017, 17:57

All bark, no bite. 8-)
Hodgson wrote:You just have to face reality that you are not well liked by some people here. Not necessarily people who will shout on the BCB cunt threads,but posters who are well liked by all and who get on with the business of posting to threads when they want

User avatar
Rayge
Posts: 12229
Joined: 14 Aug 2013, 11:37
Location: deepest Devon
Contact:

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Rayge » 05 Dec 2017, 18:06

Image
KAT/COYS

You can't play a tune on an absolute

When the ball sleeps it dreams it is a Frisbee

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Love is the law, love under will

User avatar
Thang-y
Posts: 1000
Joined: 29 Apr 2016, 17:59
Contact:

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Thang-y » 05 Dec 2017, 18:22

Rayge wrote:Image


Maybe it's just me but the phrase springing to mind with that is

"Get orf moi laaaaaaaand!"

User avatar
Harvey K-Tel
Long Player
Posts: 39455
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Harvey K-Tel » 05 Dec 2017, 18:31

If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
German Dave
Utter Cad
Posts: 50643
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:22
Location: 16 Beasley Street

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby German Dave » 05 Dec 2017, 18:44

Thang-y wrote:Oh and the other day German Dave posted on here chiding someone for taking the piss on this thread and suggesting it not being encouraging to newcomers (or words along those lines). He then deleted it.


:? Are you sure about that? This sounds like mistaken identity since I do not recall doing any such thing (either the chiding or the deleting).
kewl klive wrote:A deluxe Sandinista! was pulled when only one outtake could be found.


User avatar
Thang-y
Posts: 1000
Joined: 29 Apr 2016, 17:59
Contact:

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Thang-y » 05 Dec 2017, 18:47

My mistake, it's still there and maybe it wasn't that strong. But I'd call that chiding.

German Dave wrote:
The Unfragrant Ox wrote:THEY ARE ANGRY AND THEY WANT ANSWERS

Image


I must say, John, you've really excelled yourself on this thread - you remind me of certain kids I teach.

And then you moan how no-one posts on the board any more. Cunning stuntery of the highest order.

User avatar
Copehead
BCB Cup Stalinist
Posts: 23359
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 18:51
Location: at sea

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Copehead » 05 Dec 2017, 19:25

The Modernist wrote:I've come across it in some areas more than others. I remember being very aware of it when I was trying to get "ahead" in publishing in London for example. I became very aware that I just didn't have the right background in terms of university and schooling. I'd approach it very differently now and go more left-field, concentrating on small publishers, but at the time I was just discouraged.
I agree very much with that last paragraph.


I was lucky to be academically drawn to the world of science which is far more meritocratic.

There is no equivalent of getting your nephew Tarquin in to the magazine to write gibberish that the sub-eds can knock into coherence in science, you can either do it or you cant and if you can't you don't have a job.

Perhaps writing isn't the obvious example because to do very well you probably need a genuine talent but the top end of article writing is so small you can fill that pool with fish from the upper echelons of society in the main anyway.

The upper classes have less of a grip over the magisteria of science since universal state education because it has to be be genuinely meritocratic for obvious reasons.

They still seem to do pretty well at sowing up Law but perhaps at the top end it is just a much smaller world than Science like periodical writing.

But generally the upper middle classes excel in areas where clueless chancers with the right tie can get on with a bit of bonhomie and a cut class accent - banking, trading, publishing, politics.

The real upper classes, of course, don't actually need to get jobs at all. Which is the whole point.
And sometimes I ride on bus x82, say what!

Image

Bear baiting & dog fights a speciality.

User avatar
German Dave
Utter Cad
Posts: 50643
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:22
Location: 16 Beasley Street

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby German Dave » 05 Dec 2017, 19:40

Thang-y wrote:My mistake, it's still there and maybe it wasn't that strong. But I'd call that chiding.


Ah right, fair enough. Completely warranted, of course.
kewl klive wrote:A deluxe Sandinista! was pulled when only one outtake could be found.


User avatar
nev gash
cultural defective
Posts: 15505
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: jouissance

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby nev gash » 05 Dec 2017, 22:21

Rayge wrote:Image


Fucking hell, Prince Harry is looking overworked there - get him a throne and a bagful of cash.
Hodgson wrote:You just have to face reality that you are not well liked by some people here. Not necessarily people who will shout on the BCB cunt threads,but posters who are well liked by all and who get on with the business of posting to threads when they want

User avatar
echolalia
Posts: 4282
Joined: 21 Jul 2006, 02:23
Location: Way Out West

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby echolalia » 06 Dec 2017, 02:05

The Prof wrote:
echolalia wrote:Portugal (1974)


Interesting.

I hadn't heard of The Carnation Revolution before. The Portuguese Monarchy was overthrown in 1910 leading to a chaotic 16 year Republic followed by a psudo-fasist dictatorship. Overthrown peacefully in 1974.
I'm not sure if there are any lessons for us now but it was an interesting read.
There''s still some kind of unofficial Royal family - is that right?

Well, the man who would be king is still around. He’s a public figure – a minor celebrity. But no one really wants a return to monarchy and his chances of fucking up the country on behalf of his own lineage are very remote.

1974 was a bloodless military coup but things got pretty giddy in the aftermath and for a time it looked as if Portugal would join the Soviet bloc. It was a very anarchic period – I’ve heard lots of stories of mansions overrun by gangs of abandoned, semi-feral children. The democratic left won out.

This song (recorded in Chateau d’Hérouville in 1971) was the sign for the revolution to start – when it played on the radio, the tanks/good times did roll:


User avatar
Thang-y
Posts: 1000
Joined: 29 Apr 2016, 17:59
Contact:

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Thang-y » 06 Dec 2017, 13:08

Thang-y wrote:Politically, I believe they're powerless but I'm about to read the articles you posted. Legally, however, she is sovereign. That may have a bearing on it ... [*edit: yes I think the connection/logic is probably that in the same way you won't get a R. -vs- R. prosecution, a legal step against the crown, similarly they want consent in passing laws affecting the crown*]


Speaking of the power and accountability of the head of state, I see that Trump's lawyer is trying to claim that: "(The) President cannot obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer under (the Constitution's Article II) and has every right to express his view of any case."

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/04/polit ... index.html

Nice try but Trump will remain accountable. He has to. Right?


User avatar
K
Posts: 7866
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby K » 07 Dec 2017, 16:36

The Prince of Wales has admitted he privately lobbied Alex Salmond to promote a charity that wanted to win contracts to train new teachers in Scotland, according to official documents released following a lengthy disclosure battle.

Four months after the Scottish government refused to release the unredacted correspondence to the Guardian, ministers have relented and produced papers detailing how the prince personally lobbied the then first minister in June 2013.

A previously censored letter confirms that the charity Teach First used the meeting between “our patron, HRH the Prince Charles” and Salmond to pressure the then Scottish education secretary, Mike Russell, into meeting its chief executive, Brett Wigdortz.
“He’s got the memory of an elephant ... and the trophy cabinet of one too.”

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 65249
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Diamond Dog » 28 Dec 2017, 10:09

This is the kind of fawning obsequiousness that makes my stomach churn:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12 ... -game-let/?

So there are 50 Tory MP's who think the most pressing issue they can rally around is launching a new national lottery to fund a Royal yacht?

:roll:
Image

Mason Cooley wrote:Worried about being a dull fellow? You might develop your talent for being irritating.

User avatar
Darkness_Fish
Posts: 4740
Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Darkness_Fish » 28 Dec 2017, 10:30

It's an interesting project though. Something that is almost guaranteed to not raise the necessary funds, and collapse within a year or so. Got to be a good tax dodge in there for some of them, surely?
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.

Joe Baxter
Posts: 129
Joined: 06 Sep 2017, 10:22

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Joe Baxter » 10 Jan 2018, 15:39

Toby wrote:This is too binary.

The notion of a Monarch in today's democratic world is absurd. But in countries that have complex histories where the dialogue between institutions plays a tremendously important part in the political process, such as the constitutional monarchy of the UK, the question becomes more complex.

People have tried over the last few hundred years or so to remove their monarchs, but the evidence across the world for a peaceful transition is pretty dismal. It usually ends in catastrophic levels of blood.

Britain offers an example of a monarchy that provides a powerful symbol of living history whilst being politically benign. We had our civil war on this subject nearly 400 years ago and sorted the main issues out. The Monarchy as an institution I suspect will continue to grow smaller and smaller, perhaps even more quickly once the Queen dies.

Provide a solution on how to end the institution of the monarchy and successfully resolve the constitutional and political processes that it would involve for all parties concerned and we can proceed.

Actually "We" didn't have a civil war, England had a civil war.

User avatar
Insouciant Western People
Posts: 24571
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 13:31
Location: The pit of propaganda

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Insouciant Western People » 11 Jan 2018, 13:32

Joe Baxter wrote:Actually "We" didn't have a civil war, England had a civil war.


Actually, "You" were involved heavily in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, which is perhaps a better phrase to describe the overlapping and interrelated conflicts in the British Isles between 1639 and 1651 than the misleading expression 'English Civil War'.

And you even had your own Scottish Civil War between 1644-45, fought between the Scots Royalists and the Covenanters.

A quick precis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_in_the_Wars_of_the_Three_Kingdoms
Last edited by Insouciant Western People on 11 Jan 2018, 15:15, edited 1 time in total.
Jeff K wrote:Nick's still the man! No one has been as consistent as he has been over such a long period of time.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 31453
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: Monarchy the institution. Yes or no?

Postby Goat Boy » 11 Jan 2018, 14:50

He won't like that!
Copehead wrote:I have never seen anything that doesn't convince me that Joe Average people who vote Conservative are fundamentally too thick to understand the world



The Modernist wrote:Griff writes the best political posts.