Louis CK, Woody Allen, Bill Cosby, Kevin Spacey...

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53028
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: Kevin Spacey/Louis C.K.

Postby Snarfyguy » 21 Nov 2017, 19:10

sloopjohnc wrote:
Snarfyguy wrote:
Minnie the Minx wrote:CHARLIE FUCKING ROSE

To be honest, this one doesn't surprise me. He always seemed like something of a drunken perv


:lol:

Currently making the rounds:



German Dave wrote:
Thang-y wrote:
sloopjohnc wrote:I remember being at a Los Angeles JU and dropped "bee-yawtch." Quaco stopped me and told me he didn't like that word.

Reminds me of the time Jay-Z said that as a new father to a girl he was going to stop using the word.


Wow, that was fucking big of him.

Yeah, what a cunt! :)
Jimbo wrote:Look, all I know is pretty much what I get from Robert Parry over at Consortium News.

Thang-y

Re: sexual assault

Postby Thang-y » 22 Nov 2017, 08:23

Yeah, turns out he didn't say he'd stop.

Anyway, I've been looking up stuff about Charlie Rose - not a name in the UK - as far as I can find, he's been accused of walking around naked in his dressing room in front of staff, and of saying stuff like "I'd like to see you swimming naked in my pool".

OK that would make me uncomfortable. But you can't compare that to the rapes and other serious allegations about the likes of Weinstein. Apparently he's issued a statement admitting to inappropriate behaviour but thought he was acting in a situation where there were shared feelings. Now 'unwanted hugs' are a thing http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-42070920

There's a huge somewhat over-reaction going on. Of course they should be criticised but by reacting extremely doesn't it lessen the impact of the outrage due to criminals like Weinstein and Savile? And the reaction is selective.

There's a guy who says you can grab women by the pussy gets voted president.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 ... users.html

User avatar
Fonz
Posts: 3698
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:10
Location: Nevermore

Re: sexual assault

Postby Fonz » 22 Nov 2017, 11:23

Thang-y wrote:Yeah, turns out he didn't say he'd stop.

Anyway, I've been looking up stuff about Charlie Rose - not a name in the UK - as far as I can find, he's been accused of walking around naked in his dressing room in front of staff, and of saying stuff like "I'd like to see you swimming naked in my pool".

OK that would make me uncomfortable. But you can't compare that to the rapes and other serious allegations about the likes of Weinstein. Apparently he's issued a statement admitting to inappropriate behaviour but thought he was acting in a situation where there were shared feelings. Now 'unwanted hugs' are a thing http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-42070920

There's a huge somewhat over-reaction going on. Of course they should be criticised but by reacting extremely doesn't it lessen the impact of the outrage due to criminals like Weinstein and Savile? And the reaction is selective.

There's a guy who says you can grab women by the pussy gets voted president.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 ... users.html


Yeah, I agree. To compare a simple ‘hug’ with something more unpleasant doesn’t do anyone any favours.
Hugging is one of those potentially awkward social situations where it’s not always clear just how much to hug/hold. There’s plenty of scope for misinterpretation.
Heyyyy!

"Fonz clearly has no fucks to give. I like the cut of his Cupicidal gib."

User avatar
sloopjohnc
Posts: 63499
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: sexual assault

Postby sloopjohnc » 22 Nov 2017, 14:25

And now John Lasseter, head of Pixar, has resigned for inappropriate behavior.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
Dr Markus
Posts: 17670
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 18:16

Re: sexual assault

Postby Dr Markus » 22 Nov 2017, 14:29

sloopjohnc wrote:And now John Lasseter, head of Pixar, has resigned for inappropriate behavior.


He's on leave rather than resign I think.
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model

User avatar
Earl E. Eel
hounds people off the board
Posts: 19166
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: selling a self-detonating James Last CD to a Copenhagen thrift store

Re: sexual assault

Postby Earl E. Eel » 22 Nov 2017, 14:53

Fonz wrote:
Thang-y wrote:Yeah, turns out he didn't say he'd stop.

Anyway, I've been looking up stuff about Charlie Rose - not a name in the UK - as far as I can find, he's been accused of walking around naked in his dressing room in front of staff, and of saying stuff like "I'd like to see you swimming naked in my pool".

OK that would make me uncomfortable. But you can't compare that to the rapes and other serious allegations about the likes of Weinstein. Apparently he's issued a statement admitting to inappropriate behaviour but thought he was acting in a situation where there were shared feelings. Now 'unwanted hugs' are a thing http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-42070920

There's a huge somewhat over-reaction going on. Of course they should be criticised but by reacting extremely doesn't it lessen the impact of the outrage due to criminals like Weinstein and Savile? And the reaction is selective.

There's a guy who says you can grab women by the pussy gets voted president.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 ... users.html


Yeah, I agree. To compare a simple ‘hug’ with something more unpleasant doesn’t do anyone any favours.
Hugging is one of those potentially awkward social situations where it’s not always clear just how much to hug/hold. There’s plenty of scope for misinterpretation.


Yeah, that's the real problem here, as far as I see it.

There have been overreactions, you see them everywhere on social media. It's bewildering. And even tho' in every case the behaviour of the male has been at least reprehensible, we need to look at every case individually - otherwise an old DJ who grabbed a minor's arse in 1974 is thrown in the can with a serial rapist. That's the danger, anyway - I'm not saying this is necessarily happening.

I expect over time this will correct itself as more and more instances are brought to light. But I find that, right now, any attempt to downplay the seriousness of an assault (and I'm not saying any of them should be dismissed, by the way) results in all kinds of abuse. Reason goes out of the window. Twitter is full of this kind of stuff now. People aren't drawing lines.
GoogaMooga wrote:you have to look to the Dutch licensee, Disky

I've got more Disky product

a label like Dutch Disky

One comp to avoid, though, is Disky's "Best of the 70's"

Normally, Disky are clever at repackaging

User avatar
Dr Markus
Posts: 17670
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 18:16

Re: sexual assault

Postby Dr Markus » 22 Nov 2017, 15:32

I've said before, In instances like above with Lasseter you would like to feel that people would tell him, "no offense but you're getting a bit close". Instead of taking it to HR or higher. I know this isn't always possible because you worry for your job, but at least give the person a chance to correct their behavior. If they don't however, yeah, HR or higher.
Last edited by Dr Markus on 23 Nov 2017, 15:03, edited 1 time in total.
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model

User avatar
Minnie Cheddars
funky thigh collector
Posts: 29583
Joined: 29 Dec 2006, 16:00
Location: In the naughty North and in the sexy South

Re: sexual assault

Postby Minnie Cheddars » 22 Nov 2017, 15:42

I think in the case of Charlie Rose certainly, some would have felt particularly irritated that he spent so much time on his shows digging in substantially to the issues that motivated the alleged sexual transgressions of others when they knew something about him most did not.

The fallout and sackings and resignations and cancellations are certainly thought provoking in terms of the thought that 'everything is being chucked in the same soup'. Is it just sexual behaviour that should prompt a network to drop someone? How about tax evasion, being rude to wait staff, being terrible parents, being actively homophobic, hunting animals and taking home trophy heads? All of those things piss someone off, and many of the things that people are being accused of have not broken any laws that I know of.

It's a complex issue that isn't going to become any less so.
You come at the Queen, you best not miss.

Dr Markus wrote:
Someone in your line of work usually as their own man cave aka the shed we're they can potter around fixing stuff or something don't they?

User avatar
PresMuffley
Posts: 1047
Joined: 06 Feb 2017, 12:00

Re: sexual assault

Postby PresMuffley » 23 Nov 2017, 08:56

The allegations against Al Franken have smelled fishy from the start to me considering the source, and how the obviously jokey photo in which he isn't even close to touching Tweeden has been deemed demeaning by so many people strikes me as bizarre. And he also apparently played a little non-consensual grab-ass with some lady at a state fair. Clearly inappropriate if true, but how am I to know what really happened? There's so much disinformation. Anyone see people quoting the supposed photographer of the Tweeden pic as saying it was staged? Yeah, that was BS. No one seems to know who the real photographer is.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.

Thang-y

Re: sexual assault

Postby Thang-y » 23 Nov 2017, 11:48

Fonz wrote:Yeah, I agree. To compare a simple ‘hug’ with something more unpleasant doesn’t do anyone any favours.
Hugging is one of those potentially awkward social situations where it’s not always clear just how much to hug/hold. There’s plenty of scope for misinterpretation.


Yeah, let's be clear, anyone who's not an intimate saying "I'd like to see you naked" or giving you unwanted hugs is creepyville. And when it's your boss (Charlie Rose or the Pixar guy) or in a work situation that is abuse of the work relationship.


I also think there's a "ooh he did what"? frenzy going on - the media are whipping it up for their own purposes and there's no shortage of us taking it up. Al Franken case in point.

But on the whole if it stops real abuses going on, better out in the open, no?

User avatar
PresMuffley
Posts: 1047
Joined: 06 Feb 2017, 12:00

Re: sexual assault

Postby PresMuffley » 23 Nov 2017, 12:12

When I posted earlier I didn't know two more women have come forward to accuse Franken of improprieties. Was just looking at Jezebel and many commenters appeared to have had one too many last night. Not that it's typically a bastion of rational discussion.

Anonymous allegations are just that to me. Give me something real and I'll be more than willing to listen, but until that time I will remain extremely skeptical about this.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.

User avatar
Fonz
Posts: 3698
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:10
Location: Nevermore

Re: sexual assault

Postby Fonz » 23 Nov 2017, 13:15

Thang-y wrote:
Fonz wrote:Yeah, I agree. To compare a simple ‘hug’ with something more unpleasant doesn’t do anyone any favours.
Hugging is one of those potentially awkward social situations where it’s not always clear just how much to hug/hold. There’s plenty of scope for misinterpretation.


Yeah, let's be clear, anyone who's not an intimate saying "I'd like to see you naked" or giving you unwanted hugs is creepyville. And when it's your boss (Charlie Rose or the Pixar guy) or in a work situation that is abuse of the work relationship.


I also think there's a "ooh he did what"? frenzy going on - the media are whipping it up for their own purposes and there's no shortage of us taking it up. Al Franken case in point.

But on the whole if it stops real abuses going on, better out in the open, no?


The thing about 'hugs' is they are hard to avoid if you don't want to appear aloof or antisocial/unfriendly.
I was never a 'hugger' as a young man-my family, although very affectionate and loving with each other, just didn't go around giving vague friends and acquaintances hugs, and so when I left home into the wider world and random friends would just greet you with a big hug and often that mwah mwah air kiss thing, it often made me feel a bit awkward, even if it wasn't always unwelcome. After all, I am a friendly bloke, and I don't want folks thinking I'm a misery.
It's been very rare that a 'hug' has involved a grope from the other person.

If women are having to deal with that sort of thing regularly, well, that's grim, and I've no doubt it happens a lot.
Heyyyy!

"Fonz clearly has no fucks to give. I like the cut of his Cupicidal gib."

User avatar
PresMuffley
Posts: 1047
Joined: 06 Feb 2017, 12:00

Re: sexual assault

Postby PresMuffley » 23 Nov 2017, 14:50

I thought it was awesome Seinfeld refused to hug Kesha (which autocorrect just tried to write as Jesus) a little while back. I'm not a fan of people invading my personal space at all. The only female friend I hug is my best friend's wife, but we've known each other since we were 14 or 15.
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room.

User avatar
Geezee
Posts: 12339
Joined: 24 Jul 2003, 10:14
Location: Where joy divides into vision

Re: sexual assault

Postby Geezee » 23 Nov 2017, 15:17

Personally I don't think there has been an overreaction in any way whatsoever, or at least, if there is an overreaction it is because there has been 200,000 years of underreaction that precedes it.

Ultimately, I think everyone with half a brain is able to understand the difference between rape versus various other transgressions that have been reported - people aren't being tarnished with the same brush, nor do I believe that people equate what Weinstein is alleged to have done (and already admitted he's done) versus what is generally being classified as inappropriate behaviour. The fact of the matter is that all these men got away with appalling behaviour - and indeed many have admitted this - and their companies a) buried their heads in the sand b) actively covered up c) did not provide adequate mechanisms to prevent/address it or d) all of the above.
Smilies are ON
Flash is OFF
Url is ON

User avatar
Dr Markus
Posts: 17670
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 18:16

Re: sexual assault

Postby Dr Markus » 29 Nov 2017, 16:02

When the BBC post

Matt Lauer: NBC sacks star Today Show host over sex allegation


Do many people outside of the US know who he is? Are we getting to the stage where, despite just being a star in the US, it's still a big story.
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model

User avatar
sloopjohnc
Posts: 63499
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: sexual assault

Postby sloopjohnc » 29 Nov 2017, 17:02

This morning, they announced on the Today Show that longtime host, Matt Lauer, has been fired because of some transgressions. Savanah Guthrie, one of the other hosts was pretty shaken having to read the news they had only handed her moments before.

The Today Show is a venerable morning news/interview/entertainment show and has been on NBC since the early '60s. The hosts have become institutions, Lauer being one.

That's three big media personalities gone: Bill O'Reilly, Charlie Rose and now, Matt Lauer. These are all guys with big followings, a large amount being women, especially with Rose and Lauer.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
sloopjohnc
Posts: 63499
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: sexual assault

Postby sloopjohnc » 29 Nov 2017, 17:04

The Great Defector wrote:When the BBC post

Matt Lauer: NBC sacks star Today Show host over sex allegation


Do many people outside of the US know who he is? Are we getting to the stage where, despite just being a star in the US, it's still a big story.


He's like the morning show version of David Letterman or Johnny Carson. He's probably been host for nearly 20 years and had been given all the important interviews by NBC, one of the three main networks.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
LeBaron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 43018
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: sexual assault

Postby LeBaron » 29 Nov 2017, 17:24

Strangely enough, the Today Show has been unutterably terrible for, oh, about 20 years now.
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
LeBaron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 43018
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: sexual assault

Postby LeBaron » 29 Nov 2017, 17:31

And now Garrison Keillor gets the axe.

The hits keep coming!
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
sloopjohnc
Posts: 63499
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: sexual assault

Postby sloopjohnc » 29 Nov 2017, 17:32

Still Baron wrote:Strangely enough, the Today Show has been unutterably terrible for, oh, about 20 years now.


It was when Joe Garagiola left, wasn't it?
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!