Classic Rock Sneelock wrote:for those who are just joining us AFTER the thread name change: a vote of "yeah" means you'd like to have sexual relations with Anna Kendrick and a "no" vote means you wouldn't.
How do I change my vote, quick?
Classic Rock Sneelock wrote:for those who are just joining us AFTER the thread name change: a vote of "yeah" means you'd like to have sexual relations with Anna Kendrick and a "no" vote means you wouldn't.
Walk In My Shadow wrote:changing the title is just chicken.
fueryIre wrote:Walk In My Shadow wrote:changing the title is just chicken.
Poor old GoogaMooga - unfairly banned from the board and now callously brushed under the carpet like he never existed
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model
The Great Defector wrote:fueryIre wrote:Walk In My Shadow wrote:changing the title is just chicken.
Poor old GoogaMooga - unfairly banned from the board and now callously brushed under the carpet like he never existed
Did he ever exist in the first place? I was watching this documentary called "IT" about this group of people that swear they saw and interacted with someone since they were kids, but no one else could see him.
Diamond Dog wrote:...it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce...
...a multitude of innuendo and hearsay...
...I'm producing facts here...
The Great Defector wrote:fueryIre wrote:Walk In My Shadow wrote:changing the title is just chicken.
Poor old GoogaMooga - unfairly banned from the board and now callously brushed under the carpet like he never existed
Did he ever exist in the first place? I was watching this documentary called "IT" about this group of people that swear they saw and interacted with someone since they were kids, but no one else could see him.
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model
Diamond Dog wrote:...it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce...
...a multitude of innuendo and hearsay...
...I'm producing facts here...
Jeemo wrote:oohhhhh burn.
Diamond Dog wrote:Jeemo wrote:oohhhhh burn.
Some more cutting witticisms from the BCB answer to Peter Cook, no doubt?
Jeemo wrote:Diamond Dog wrote:Jeemo wrote:oohhhhh burn.
Some more cutting witticisms from the BCB answer to Peter Cook, no doubt?
I couldn't begin to put it into words I'm so upset. I'll get myself together and tell you on Facebook, Pete.
Thang-y wrote:It just occurred to me, such mocking (I know I took part, maybe I shouldn't have) someone who no longer can or does take part in the board is cheap, easy and possibly in this case of a bullying mentality. It's starting to feel creepy.
My 2c.
Carry on.
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model
WG Kaspar wrote:So what did we learn from all this BCB?
Diamond Dog wrote:...it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce...
...a multitude of innuendo and hearsay...
...I'm producing facts here...
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.