Grenfell Tower Fire - London

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Dr. B. Eef
hounds people off the board
Posts: 12742
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Dr. B. Eef » 16 Jun 2017, 14:32

Indeed. It's not a conspiracy theory.
The Savage Young Gash wrote:Who needs dancing when you have sports and fresh Californian produce?

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 29129
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Goat Boy » 16 Jun 2017, 14:41

On the Beeb it's saying at least 30 confirmed dead and up to 76 could be missing
Copehead wrote:You are making a fool of yourself.


Lord Rother, talking about Big Big Train wrote:the best band on the planet right now

User avatar
The Savage Young Gash
cultural defective
Posts: 12875
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: standing around, exchanging tales and mischief...

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby The Savage Young Gash » 16 Jun 2017, 15:06

The market, and those who wish to profit from it, should not be allowed anywhere near the safety net of the NHS or social housing. The whole housing sector needs govt intervention, providing a decent, safe home for those least able to afford one. Pay for some of it by introducing an "empty house tax" on those who live in the U.K. (what's left of it) for less than three months and how about a real effort to close tax loopholes and work-arounds too. Private landlords should be heavily regulated and fairly, progressively taxed.
Dogshit wrote:I'd like to say I;d never resort to bombs - but I;m not sure I can ever truly walk in those shoes


Dogshit wrote:I do find the inclusion of women unsavoury


Dogshit wrote:Did either Duck Dunn or James Jefferson change music irrevocably?


User avatar
Bride Of Sea Of Tunes
Posts: 16700
Joined: 17 Oct 2010, 14:10
Location: The Nether World

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Bride Of Sea Of Tunes » 16 Jun 2017, 18:21

The Modernist wrote:Well I'm blaming the Tories and their neo-liberal cohorts New Labour for failing to invest properly in public housing, including safety, and for deregulation of the markets to allow their chums to make vast profits on property speculation. I think it's directly relevent to this tragedy.

The sooner people wake up to that the better.


Agree in full.

BTW the general situation in Holland is not that different. Neoliberal greed and indifference bordering on the psychopathic rule here too, I am thinking of how the people in our province of Groningen were cheated upon, and their problems ignored, because winning gas there was very profitable for long years. There were no casualties, but we did see extreme stress, depression, and lots of houses becoming virtually worthless after local earthquakes had occurred. There's still no decent settlement for financial recompense.

No wonder if you have to struggle with a vague construct that consists of the state and Shell, amongst others.

Edit: and just as New (now Old-New) Labour is equally to blame, our own version of Labour, the PvdA, also is responsible.
The invisible and the non-existing very much look alike.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 62644
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Diamond Dog » 16 Jun 2017, 18:54

The Modernist wrote:Well I'm blaming the Tories and their neo-liberal cohorts New Labour for failing to invest properly in public housing, including safety, and for deregulation of the markets to allow their chums to make vast profits on property speculation. I think it's directly relevent to this tragedy.

The sooner people wake up to that the better.


Be careful G - you'll have some smart arse coming along soon to (wittily) retort "It's always 1970 somewhere, isn't it?".

Good to see you back.
Diamond Dog wrote:I've just backed "Conservatives With No Overall Majority" at 4/1. So there!

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 22147
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: In a beautiful place out in the country

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Deebank » 16 Jun 2017, 20:42

The Modernist wrote:Well I'm blaming the Tories and their neo-liberal cohorts New Labour for failing to invest properly in public housing, including safety, and for deregulation of the markets to allow their chums to make vast profits on property speculation. I think it's directly relevent to this tragedy.

The sooner people wake up to that the better.


The cost saving from not using the fire retardant cladding was less than £5000 apparently.

Fucking penny pinching Tory scum.
Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 51724
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Snarfyguy » 17 Jun 2017, 05:38

Months Python called it 40 years ago.



Edit: I make no claim, of course, that this sketch remains funny, in light of the tragedy under discussion.
Last edited by Snarfyguy on 18 Jun 2017, 00:37, edited 1 time in total.
Jimbo wrote:In some ways, personality-wise, Trump and I are similar.

User avatar
Pat O'Banton
Utter Cad
Posts: 49869
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:22
Location: 16 Beasley Street

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Pat O'Banton » 17 Jun 2017, 13:25

Almost unbearably powerful:

Take a look at @trapgodlou's Tweet: https://twitter.com/trapgodlou/status/8 ... 74112?s=09
Goat Boy wrote:TVc 15 rocks my world. The chorus makes me want to fuck a horse.

User avatar
Samoan
Posts: 9378
Joined: 28 May 2008, 10:22
Location: The Steaming Metropolis

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Samoan » 18 Jun 2017, 11:31

I used to admire Clive Lewis. Not any more.
Abhorrent.

https://twitter.com/labourlewis/status/ ... 3693960193
Pat O'Banton wrote:My Polish punk did me no favours at all.

User avatar
Jeemo
Posts: 19856
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 23:17
Location: ????

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Jeemo » 18 Jun 2017, 11:49

Pat O'Banton wrote:Almost unbearably powerful:

Take a look at @trapgodlou's Tweet: https://twitter.com/trapgodlou/status/8 ... 74112?s=09



The numbers of victims and missing seem low compared to the size of the tower block. seems to be a lack of survivors in the media. when they are usually all over the human interest angle.

I hope I'm wrong but the death toll could be much larger than what's being reported.
Image So Long Kid, Take A Bow.

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 14675
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Belle Lettre » 18 Jun 2017, 12:19

It may well be that Lily Allen didn't make quite such a tit of herself after all.
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 62644
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Diamond Dog » 18 Jun 2017, 13:19

Pat O'Banton wrote:Almost unbearably powerful:

Take a look at @trapgodlou's Tweet: https://twitter.com/trapgodlou/status/8 ... 74112?s=09


Sadly I think that's more like the truth.
As she said - there must be a known number of occupants, survivors, those in hospital and known dead. Why isn't that remaining number being released?
Diamond Dog wrote:I've just backed "Conservatives With No Overall Majority" at 4/1. So there!

User avatar
Nick
Posts: 24048
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 13:31
Location: Up late at night again

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Nick » 18 Jun 2017, 18:19

This is a good and straightforward explanation, cuts through the conspiracist fake news being bandied around.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/what-official-death-toll-grenfell-10641711

The emergency services are doing it by the book.

Here's what the Metropolitan Police's major incident procedure manual has to say.

"There should be no speculation on fatality figures and the police should only confirm the number of dead after they have a true and accurate picture."
Jeff K wrote:Nick's still the man! No one has been as consistent as he has been over such a long period of time.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 62644
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Diamond Dog » 18 Jun 2017, 18:40

I'm not suggesting there is a conspiracy at all - i'm just saying that there appears to be wildly conflicting numbers. I understand that the police can't give numbers without bodies - but, equally, they must have a fair idea of how many people were there at the time and how many are accounted for? What harm would it do to release the approximate number of people unnaccounted for?
Diamond Dog wrote:I've just backed "Conservatives With No Overall Majority" at 4/1. So there!

User avatar
Belle Lettre
Éminence grise
Posts: 14675
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 07:16
Location: Antiterra

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Belle Lettre » 18 Jun 2017, 20:58

Latest from the Guardian:

Kensington and Chelsea council has been relieved of responsibility for taking care of the survivors of the Grenfell Tower disaster.

The work is being handed over to a new Grenfell Fire Response Team, made up of representatives from central government, the British Red Cross, the Metropolitan police, London-wide local and regional government, and the London Fire Brigade.

It is embarrassing for the council, the wealthiest in the country, to have had to cede control.
Nikki Gradual wrote:
Get a fucking grip you narcissistic cretins.

User avatar
Nick
Posts: 24048
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 13:31
Location: Up late at night again

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Nick » 19 Jun 2017, 12:58

Diamond Dog wrote:I'm not suggesting there is a conspiracy at all - i'm just saying that there appears to be wildly conflicting numbers. I understand that the police can't give numbers without bodies - but, equally, they must have a fair idea of how many people were there at the time and how many are accounted for? What harm would it do to release the approximate number of people unnaccounted for?


But they have done that throughout, it was given as 58 a couple of days ago. It's now being reported as 79 dead or missing and presumed dead, by the BBC, based on people cited as missing by other survivors, friends and relatives.
Jeff K wrote:Nick's still the man! No one has been as consistent as he has been over such a long period of time.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 62644
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Diamond Dog » 19 Jun 2017, 16:39

Nick wrote:
Diamond Dog wrote:I'm not suggesting there is a conspiracy at all - i'm just saying that there appears to be wildly conflicting numbers. I understand that the police can't give numbers without bodies - but, equally, they must have a fair idea of how many people were there at the time and how many are accounted for? What harm would it do to release the approximate number of people unnaccounted for?


But they have done that throughout, it was given as 58 a couple of days ago. It's now being reported as 79 dead or missing and presumed dead, by the BBC, based on people cited as missing by other survivors, friends and relatives.


Okay. So they are updating it. So why does it keep rising? By any definition, it should be coming down, as people are found or found not to have been there.
Diamond Dog wrote:I've just backed "Conservatives With No Overall Majority" at 4/1. So there!

User avatar
Nick
Posts: 24048
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 13:31
Location: Up late at night again

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Nick » 20 Jun 2017, 13:15

Diamond Dog wrote:
Nick wrote:
Diamond Dog wrote:I'm not suggesting there is a conspiracy at all - i'm just saying that there appears to be wildly conflicting numbers. I understand that the police can't give numbers without bodies - but, equally, they must have a fair idea of how many people were there at the time and how many are accounted for? What harm would it do to release the approximate number of people unnaccounted for?


But they have done that throughout, it was given as 58 a couple of days ago. It's now being reported as 79 dead or missing and presumed dead, by the BBC, based on people cited as missing by other survivors, friends and relatives.


Okay. So they are updating it. So why does it keep rising? By any definition, it should be coming down, as people are found or found not to have been there.


Well that's the figure for both dead and presumed missing. So I think partly it will be rising because more bodies have been found, so the number of confirmed dead goes up. But also as days go by more people will have been reported missing, so that figure is rising too.

And then there's the fact that nobody really knows yet for sure how many people were in the tower block when it caught fire. A tower block of 120 flats isn't like an airliner or a ferry, where you have a definite passenger list.

One factor is that a number of people, both among the survivors and dead, could have been undocumented illegal immigrants, and if they are dead, their families may be understandably reluctant to come forward, because they may be in a similar predicament themselves.
Jeff K wrote:Nick's still the man! No one has been as consistent as he has been over such a long period of time.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 62644
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Diamond Dog » 20 Jun 2017, 13:20

Okay - I accept that.
Diamond Dog wrote:I've just backed "Conservatives With No Overall Majority" at 4/1. So there!

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13377
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: Grenfell Tower Fire - London

Postby Jimbo » 21 Jun 2017, 03:01





"They found 42 bodies in one room all hiding together."
I love you.


Return to “Nextdoorland”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests