Jimbo wrote:Oh, Mueller knows what he's doing. He's lying like he did for Bush in the Iraq war. That's his role. And I think by indicting 12 Russians who will never appear in court, plus no Americans, he knows he won't have to try and prove his case. (Baron's right about me not knowing what will happen in Congress but how often do we hear how the intelligence won't reveal its methods?) It's a pantomime, a ruse to keep the anti-Trump/anti-Putin money train rolling. Look, we know now that the Iraq war was based upon lies of Sadam's WMD and even non-existent nukes, or was that "in my mind"? The NYT, WAPO, MSNBC, mainstream media went along, right? And that was not so long ago they pulled that shit off by "catapulting the propaganda." Well, place the two situations up against each other and see the similarities, especially Mueller's role. He's good. Very good. Hopefully this will not lead to war-war but a cold war with more expensive weapons needed, well, buy me some Raytheon and Boeing stocks today!
Jimbo - just hold your theories about what is “really” going on to the same scrutiny you do the Russia evidence.
You keep asking for US Intelligence to show evidence. But you would never believe any evidence that came from them anyhow. If they had video of Trump going down on Putin, you would insist that it must be CGI.
Nobody could blame you for not wanting to trust them. To a large degree, they brought that on themselves. But when you make the active presumption that they always are lying AND THEN give yourself license to make up whatever weak-tea scenario you want about the supposed truth. THAT is where you go off the rails.
So fine. Don’t feel convinced be the growing mountain of evidence? You show me evidence that there is a false flag conspiracy at play. I want something more than conjecture. Show me.
If you can’t, then admit that you’re just making shit up so we can all feel better about ignoring you and/or holding you in contempt.