toomanyhatz wrote:I apologize. I read it using my critical thinking skills. I know I wasn't supposed to.
So perhaps you could explain to me in easy-to-understand steps what I'm supposed to be concluding that I'm not concluding.
Thanks for reading the thing. My conclusion after reading the Greenwald piece is that there is a very odd, undemocratic, slanderous, conspiratorial effort in these usually (formerly) reliable media sources to make Trump - and Russia - look bad. These are not simple mistakes for if they were, statistically, there would be at least a story or two which made them look good. Your Trump-bias aside, what point do you think Greenwald was trying to make. Why do you think he wrote this story?