"Fake News"

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks

Ban "fake news" sites?

Yes
1
14%
No
6
86%
 
Total votes: 7

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13862
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Jimbo » 20 Mar 2017, 13:57

Reading an article in the online English version of the Asahi Shimbun titled: UPDATE: Japan and Russia hold talks on security, territorial dispute THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. At first I thought, good, at least Japan is holding talks with Russia but then I hit this fake news line: The talks are the first "two-plus-two" meeting since Russia's annexation of Ukraine..

http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201703200008.html

You see? Russia Russia Russia! No, Associated Press, Russia did not annex Ukraine. Ukraine, with Obama's and HRC's assistance, overthrew its president and installed a new and much better America-friendly president.
persona non grata among those who worship at the altar of conventional wisdom

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 64208
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Diamond Dog » 20 Mar 2017, 14:14

Drone on.
In science, the most important criteria for success is not being stunningly full of shit.

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 20 Mar 2017, 15:35

I can relate. I go through the same thing every time someone falsely claims that the world is round. Can't they just admit that we've all been hoodwinked by the globe industry?
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13862
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Jimbo » 22 Mar 2017, 12:43

Foreign Affairs magazine mofos! This ain't fake.

The point is simply to grasp the legitimacy in Moscow’s perspective—that expansion of the Western blocs is not an organic, democratic process but, rather, one engineered by the United States and its allies, and motivated as much by power as by principle.


https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles ... ew-d-tente
persona non grata among those who worship at the altar of conventional wisdom

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 22 Mar 2017, 23:05

Jimbo wrote:Foreign Affairs magazine mofos! This ain't fake.

The point is simply to grasp the legitimacy in Moscow’s perspective—that expansion of the Western blocs is not an organic, democratic process but, rather, one engineered by the United States and its allies, and motivated as much by power as by principle.


https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles ... ew-d-tente


It's not fake. Nor is it news. It's an opinion piece.

Not being a subscriber, I can't read the entire thing. From what I could read, I'm not unsympathetic to the basic thrust. But nothing there precludes the possibility that Russia interfered with our election.
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13862
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Jimbo » 07 Apr 2017, 02:34

I would hope you'd be skeptical of recent claims that Assad gassed his own citizens because you read it in your favorite (fake) MSM source. I find it uncanny that, again, so soon after an attack how a good reporter can poke holes in the official story.

NYT Retreats on 2013 Syria-Sarin Claims
April 6, 2017

Exclusive: Even as The New York Times leads the charge against the Syrian government for this week’s alleged chemical attack, it is quietly retreating on its earlier certainty about the 2013 Syria-sarin case, reports Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry

The New York Times, which has never heard an allegation against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad that it hasn’t immediately believed, has compiled a list of his alleged atrocities with a surprising omission: the Aug. 21, 2013 sarin gas attack outside Damascus….

If this fuller history were understood, much greater skepticism would be warranted by the new allegations about Assad ordering a new sarin attack. While it’s conceivable that Assad’s military is guilty – although why Assad would take this risk at this moment is hard to fathom – it’s also conceivable that Al Qaeda’s jihadists – finding themselves facing impending defeat – chose to stage a sarin attack even if that meant killing some innocent civilians.
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/04/06/n ... in-claims/
persona non grata among those who worship at the altar of conventional wisdom

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13862
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Jimbo » 29 Jun 2017, 07:03

The mainstream media is being shown to be the real fake news more lately than ever - especially when it comes to reporting about Russia. There is the firing of CNN reporters for supposedly wrongly reporting about a business deal between Russian financiers and a Trump colleague, and then there is the Project Vertias video secretly filming a CNN guy admitting how the Russian story is done for ratings and is "mostly bullshit." And now the New York Times is having its ass handed to it for writing a fake news hit piece on political comedian Lee Camp who has a show on RT. Camp's retort which I shall link here is funny as well as cutting citing point by point by point how the New York Times lied "bigly."

Lee Camp: How to Write Propaganda for the NY Times—As Demonstrated in an Article About Me

http://www.alternet.org/media/lee-camp- ... noman-lies
persona non grata among those who worship at the altar of conventional wisdom

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 29 Jun 2017, 07:11

Project Veritas, eh?
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13862
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Jimbo » 29 Jun 2017, 07:39

Davey the Fat Boy wrote:Project Veritas, eh?


Yeah, I know. It is fucked up how right wing, pro Trump sites are getting the truth out these days. Rather than going after Planned Parenthood or ACORN, this time O'Keef went after CNN and actually got a scoop. No matter, shooting the messenger is still a bad idea.

The Lee Camp article is in not-right wing Alternet. Does that make you less wary of the truthfulness?
persona non grata among those who worship at the altar of conventional wisdom

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 29 Jun 2017, 08:20

Now I just feel sad for you.
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
The Prof
Composing a revolutionary symphony
Posts: 44899
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 18:32
Location: A Metropolis of Discontent

Re: "Fake News"

Postby The Prof » 29 Jun 2017, 12:44

Apparently Trump has been hanging these framed fake covers of Time magazine in all his golf clubs.


Image

Time have told him to take them down.

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 22536
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: In a beautiful place out in the country

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Deebank » 29 Jun 2017, 13:24

The Prof wrote:Apparently Trump has been hanging these framed fake covers of Time magazine in all his golf clubs.


Image

Time have told him to take them down.


Image
Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13862
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Jimbo » Yesterday, 15:20

GOOGLE HIRING 10,000 REVIEWERS TO CENSOR YOUTUBE CONTENT

Google is escalating its campaign of internet censorship. On December 4, the internet giant announced it will expand its workforce of human censors to over 10,000. The censors’ primary focus will be videos and other content on YouTube, its video-sharing platform, but will work across Google to censor content and train its automated systems, which remove videos at a rate four times faster than its human employees.
https://popularresistance.org/google-hi ... e-content/
persona non grata among those who worship at the altar of conventional wisdom

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 10165
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: "Fake News"

Postby Sneelock » Yesterday, 17:17

I think TRUMP's TIME covers are a splendid metaphor for "the TRUMP era"
he doesn't fucking CARE if they are legit or not. he's on the cover of TIME - see? what are you, blind? LOL.
"Wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns.”

User avatar
toomanyhatz
Power-mad king of the WCC
Posts: 26167
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'

Re: "Fake News"

Postby toomanyhatz » Yesterday, 20:24

Without a shred of proof or evidence, the popular resistance website wrote:While railing against “extremist content,” “child exploitation” and “hoaxes” in the interest of “public safety,” the ultimate goal of this campaign is the suppression of left-wing, anti-war sentiment.


I like this part too:

The company has also begun using automated demonetization to financially censor video producers who upload content it deems “inappropriate” for monetization, including “controversial or sensitive subjects, war, political conflicts, natural disasters and tragedies, even if graphic imagery is not shown.” In August, the videos of “Ron Paul’s Liberty Report” were demonetized after a “manual review” by YouTube found it “unsuitable for advertisers.” Julian Assange referred to the action as “economic censorship,” noting that the “unsuitable” videos featured the former congressman’s criticism of president Donald Trump’s decision to send more American troops to Afghanistan, as well as criticizing the US Senate Intelligence Committee for branding Wikileaks a hostile foreign intelligence service.


So what else do they feature? Did Google or Youtube actually say they were censoring based on the politics espoused? Seems to me plenty of Left-wing propaganda ISN'T censored. Why not? Maybe because it DOESN'T include Jihadist recruiting?

I'd need a bit more information than they offer before making the assumptions they want us to make.

Funny how they claim to be railing for truth in journalism yet go out of their way to avoid any factual justification for their claims.

But, typical of what Jimbo believes. All you have to do is accuse someone of suppressing what you have to say and that automatically makes it true!
sloopjohnc wrote:I know I picked the Diamondbacks, but they were the wildcard. Next teams will be a little tougher.


1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017!