So, GOD then

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks

nail yr colours to the mast. heathen scum

Atheist
24
44%
Non-Theist
4
7%
Agnostic
7
13%
Monotheist (male deity)
6
11%
Monotheist (female deity)
1
2%
Polytheist
2
4%
Pantheist
7
13%
Autotheist
3
6%
 
Total votes: 54

User avatar
'skope
BCB poster of the year 2014
Posts: 6248
Joined: 07 Jun 2014, 13:19
Location: on diamond dog's ignore list

Re: So, GOD then

Postby 'skope » 30 Jul 2014, 18:02

Betty Denim wrote:
Minnie Darling wrote:K and Zen, you're not going to get sucked off at this rate.


What have they done to you?

:?


:D

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:03

Zen Coan wrote:
Betty Denim wrote:
Zen Coan wrote:Your descriptions were generally contemptuous in tone and intent. That's shit slinging. If it matters to you whether or not you sling shit then keep your contempt to yourself.

I say sling it if you feel it.


My intent is not up for your grabs.


Oh, it was clear enough. Be as obtuse as you like it was unmissable.


Tone, your interpretation is perfectly valid.



How kind of you to say so. How very kind.


You come over a bit soft though. :?



I guess I'll just have to try harder. I do aim to please.


I'm really not contemptuous of atheists at all.

You seem so wound up though. Relax.
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:05

Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


Were you at the right end?

You do have form. :P
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:09

K wrote:
Betty Denim wrote:
K wrote:Well you stated that atheists lack wonder, which is untrue. There are a couple of interpretations.

1. You don't know what I mean by wonder
2. You are fucking stupid.
3. You're making it up as you go along.


I said they lacked the wonder of and in certain things. Not in anything.

I don't need your Ladybird version of Unweaving the Rainbow. What do you think this is? Dead Poets Society?

I know lots of people gushed over your previous post but really Betty you write very badly. It's why you have to make things up as you go along.


K! You're not allowed to say someone's a bad writer!

:o
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:10

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:K - She didn't just exclude atheists. She said that all non-Catholics are missing out on the specific brand of wonder and romance she finds in Catholicism.

And she is right.


She wrote "Atheists lack wonder" Don't add extra qualifications. Lack doesn't mean, 'have in short supply' or 'have a different brand'.


She then went on to explain the specific wonders that Atheists lack (belief in God/angels, etc...). She didn't say that atheists lack all wonder.
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
Darryl Strawberry
Posts: 7079
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Darryl Strawberry » 30 Jul 2014, 18:11

Don't tell Coan I said it. He'll be giving it the old "You're a bit thick, I used to like you, stop acting like the board's conscience" triumvirate.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
John Coan, with nothing else to do, wrote:I just Googled his name!

User avatar
Darryl Strawberry
Posts: 7079
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Darryl Strawberry » 30 Jul 2014, 18:13

VRZ Robotz wrote:
K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:K - She didn't just exclude atheists. She said that all non-Catholics are missing out on the specific brand of wonder and romance she finds in Catholicism.

And she is right.


She wrote "Atheists lack wonder" Don't add extra qualifications. Lack doesn't mean, 'have in short supply' or 'have a different brand'.


She then went on to explain the specific wonders that Atheists lack (belief in God/angels, etc...). She didn't say that atheists lack all wonder.


Atheists lack wonder in things they don't believe in.
Right.
Atheists wonder why people believe in angels.
Better.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
John Coan, with nothing else to do, wrote:I just Googled his name!

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:13

Zen Coan wrote:So her contempt is even less exclusive than we thought?

Fabulous!


I don't read it as contempt at all. Again...she excluded me. I didn't mind. I don't deny that I am missing whatever Catholicism has to offer.

We all miss something. Choose one path, you miss all the others.
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
Darryl Strawberry
Posts: 7079
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Darryl Strawberry » 30 Jul 2014, 18:14

This could be worth its own thread but can I ask a question to the board?

Do you believe in an after life and if so, can you describe the form you believe it takes?
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
John Coan, with nothing else to do, wrote:I just Googled his name!

User avatar
Darryl Strawberry
Posts: 7079
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Darryl Strawberry » 30 Jul 2014, 18:15

VRZ Robotz wrote: Choose one path, you miss all the others.


You make that sound like a bad thing.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
John Coan, with nothing else to do, wrote:I just Googled his name!

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:16

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:
K wrote:
Atheists lack wonder in things they don't believe in.
Right.
Atheists wonder why people believe in angels.
Better.


K - everyone lacks wonder in the things they don't believe in. Wonder requires some level of buy-in.
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
Harvey K-Tel
Long Player
Posts: 38968
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Harvey K-Tel » 30 Jul 2014, 18:16

I just watched a video of a dolphin fucking the headless corpse of a fish. I'm starting to think there might be a god after all.
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
Zeke
Posts: 2969
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 00:37
Location: A dead in the eyes, soulless robot

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Zeke » 30 Jul 2014, 18:18

Betty Denim wrote:You seem so wound up though. Relax.


With the possibility of a hellfire inspired blowjob denied me?

You ask too much!

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 10173
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Sneelock » 30 Jul 2014, 18:18

VRZ Robotz wrote:Wonder requires some level of buy-in.


roughly two bucks a loaf American.
Image
"Wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns.”

User avatar
Darryl Strawberry
Posts: 7079
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Darryl Strawberry » 30 Jul 2014, 18:20

Harvey K-Tel wrote:I just watched a video of a dolphin fucking the headless corpse of a fish. I'm starting to think there might be a god after all.

That's up there with the clip of the chimpanzee fucking a frog to death.
Now there's some hell and damnation.
Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
John Coan, with nothing else to do, wrote:I just Googled his name!

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 10173
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Sneelock » 30 Jul 2014, 18:22

for the dolphin and the chimp or for the fish and the frog?
"Wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns.”

User avatar
!!VAPRANT!!
hounds people off the board
Posts: 14434
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: So, GOD then

Postby !!VAPRANT!! » 30 Jul 2014, 18:24

Betty Denim wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


Were you at the right end?

You do have form. :P


:lol: :lol:
Deewank wrote:By the way I gave you some Jelly Tots for your birthday and you didn’t give me ANYTHING

User avatar
!!VAPRANT!!
hounds people off the board
Posts: 14434
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: So, GOD then

Postby !!VAPRANT!! » 30 Jul 2014, 18:26

K wrote:Don't tell Coan I said it. He'll be giving it the old "You're a bit thick, I used to like you, stop acting like the board's conscience" triumvirate.


'triumvirate', eh?

Do you teach RE, K?
Deewank wrote:By the way I gave you some Jelly Tots for your birthday and you didn’t give me ANYTHING

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 22565
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:33

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote: Choose one path, you miss all the others.


You make that sound like a bad thing.


I do?
Marginal BCB contributor since 2006

Image

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 22545
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: In a beautiful place out in the country

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Deebank » 30 Jul 2014, 18:41

Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


I hope you informed his cardinal!
Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro