So, GOD then

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks

nail yr colours to the mast. heathen scum

Atheist
24
44%
Non-Theist
4
7%
Agnostic
7
13%
Monotheist (male deity)
6
11%
Monotheist (female deity)
1
2%
Polytheist
2
4%
Pantheist
7
13%
Autotheist
3
6%
 
Total votes: 54

User avatar
'skope
BCB poster of the year 2014
Posts: 6248
Joined: 07 Jun 2014, 13:19
Location: on diamond dog's ignore list

Re: So, GOD then

Postby 'skope » 30 Jul 2014, 18:02

Betty Denim wrote:
Minnie Darling wrote:K and Zen, you're not going to get sucked off at this rate.


What have they done to you?

:?


:D

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:03

Zen Coan wrote:
Betty Denim wrote:
Zen Coan wrote:Your descriptions were generally contemptuous in tone and intent. That's shit slinging. If it matters to you whether or not you sling shit then keep your contempt to yourself.

I say sling it if you feel it.


My intent is not up for your grabs.


Oh, it was clear enough. Be as obtuse as you like it was unmissable.


Tone, your interpretation is perfectly valid.



How kind of you to say so. How very kind.


You come over a bit soft though. :?



I guess I'll just have to try harder. I do aim to please.


I'm really not contemptuous of atheists at all.

You seem so wound up though. Relax.
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:05

Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


Were you at the right end?

You do have form. :P
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Betty Denim
Posts: 713
Joined: 23 May 2014, 15:47

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Betty Denim » 30 Jul 2014, 18:09

K wrote:
Betty Denim wrote:
K wrote:Well you stated that atheists lack wonder, which is untrue. There are a couple of interpretations.

1. You don't know what I mean by wonder
2. You are fucking stupid.
3. You're making it up as you go along.


I said they lacked the wonder of and in certain things. Not in anything.

I don't need your Ladybird version of Unweaving the Rainbow. What do you think this is? Dead Poets Society?

I know lots of people gushed over your previous post but really Betty you write very badly. It's why you have to make things up as you go along.


K! You're not allowed to say someone's a bad writer!

:o
mission wrote:gravity's greedy fingerfucking

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 23570
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:10

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:K - She didn't just exclude atheists. She said that all non-Catholics are missing out on the specific brand of wonder and romance she finds in Catholicism.

And she is right.


She wrote "Atheists lack wonder" Don't add extra qualifications. Lack doesn't mean, 'have in short supply' or 'have a different brand'.


She then went on to explain the specific wonders that Atheists lack (belief in God/angels, etc...). She didn't say that atheists lack all wonder.
The opinions of this poster are subjective. That’s how opinions work.

Image

User avatar
Pansy Puff
Posts: 8277
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Pansy Puff » 30 Jul 2014, 18:11

Don't tell Coan I said it. He'll be giving it the old "You're a bit thick, I used to like you, stop acting like the board's conscience" triumvirate.
“He’s got the memory of an elephant ... and the trophy cabinet of one too.”

User avatar
Pansy Puff
Posts: 8277
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Pansy Puff » 30 Jul 2014, 18:13

VRZ Robotz wrote:
K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:K - She didn't just exclude atheists. She said that all non-Catholics are missing out on the specific brand of wonder and romance she finds in Catholicism.

And she is right.


She wrote "Atheists lack wonder" Don't add extra qualifications. Lack doesn't mean, 'have in short supply' or 'have a different brand'.


She then went on to explain the specific wonders that Atheists lack (belief in God/angels, etc...). She didn't say that atheists lack all wonder.


Atheists lack wonder in things they don't believe in.
Right.
Atheists wonder why people believe in angels.
Better.
“He’s got the memory of an elephant ... and the trophy cabinet of one too.”

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 23570
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:13

Zen Coan wrote:So her contempt is even less exclusive than we thought?

Fabulous!


I don't read it as contempt at all. Again...she excluded me. I didn't mind. I don't deny that I am missing whatever Catholicism has to offer.

We all miss something. Choose one path, you miss all the others.
The opinions of this poster are subjective. That’s how opinions work.

Image

User avatar
Pansy Puff
Posts: 8277
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Pansy Puff » 30 Jul 2014, 18:14

This could be worth its own thread but can I ask a question to the board?

Do you believe in an after life and if so, can you describe the form you believe it takes?
“He’s got the memory of an elephant ... and the trophy cabinet of one too.”

User avatar
Pansy Puff
Posts: 8277
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Pansy Puff » 30 Jul 2014, 18:15

VRZ Robotz wrote: Choose one path, you miss all the others.


You make that sound like a bad thing.
“He’s got the memory of an elephant ... and the trophy cabinet of one too.”

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 23570
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:16

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote:
K wrote:
Atheists lack wonder in things they don't believe in.
Right.
Atheists wonder why people believe in angels.
Better.


K - everyone lacks wonder in the things they don't believe in. Wonder requires some level of buy-in.
The opinions of this poster are subjective. That’s how opinions work.

Image

User avatar
Harvey K-Tel
Long Player
Posts: 39702
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Harvey K-Tel » 30 Jul 2014, 18:16

I just watched a video of a dolphin fucking the headless corpse of a fish. I'm starting to think there might be a god after all.
If you've got nothing to do, don't do it here.

User avatar
Zeke
Posts: 2969
Joined: 17 Mar 2006, 00:37
Location: A dead in the eyes, soulless robot

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Zeke » 30 Jul 2014, 18:18

Betty Denim wrote:You seem so wound up though. Relax.


With the possibility of a hellfire inspired blowjob denied me?

You ask too much!

User avatar
sneelock
Posts: 11585
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: So, GOD then

Postby sneelock » 30 Jul 2014, 18:18

VRZ Robotz wrote:Wonder requires some level of buy-in.


roughly two bucks a loaf American.
Image
TuckerCrowe wrote:Is irony your answer to everything ?

User avatar
Pansy Puff
Posts: 8277
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Pansy Puff » 30 Jul 2014, 18:20

Harvey K-Tel wrote:I just watched a video of a dolphin fucking the headless corpse of a fish. I'm starting to think there might be a god after all.

That's up there with the clip of the chimpanzee fucking a frog to death.
Now there's some hell and damnation.
“He’s got the memory of an elephant ... and the trophy cabinet of one too.”

User avatar
sneelock
Posts: 11585
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: So, GOD then

Postby sneelock » 30 Jul 2014, 18:22

for the dolphin and the chimp or for the fish and the frog?
TuckerCrowe wrote:Is irony your answer to everything ?

User avatar
The Beatles
hounds people off the board
Posts: 17413
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: So, GOD then

Postby The Beatles » 30 Jul 2014, 18:24

Betty Denim wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


Were you at the right end?

You do have form. :P


:lol: :lol:
the Fred Dinenage of bees! wrote:BCB is boring bald men stroking each other's cocks while recommending Alan Parsons Project bootlegs

User avatar
The Beatles
hounds people off the board
Posts: 17413
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: So, GOD then

Postby The Beatles » 30 Jul 2014, 18:26

K wrote:Don't tell Coan I said it. He'll be giving it the old "You're a bit thick, I used to like you, stop acting like the board's conscience" triumvirate.


'triumvirate', eh?

Do you teach RE, K?
the Fred Dinenage of bees! wrote:BCB is boring bald men stroking each other's cocks while recommending Alan Parsons Project bootlegs

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 23570
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 30 Jul 2014, 18:33

K wrote:
VRZ Robotz wrote: Choose one path, you miss all the others.


You make that sound like a bad thing.


I do?
The opinions of this poster are subjective. That’s how opinions work.

Image

User avatar
Deebank
Resonator
Posts: 22920
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 13:47
Location: In a beautiful place out in the country

Re: So, GOD then

Postby Deebank » 30 Jul 2014, 18:41

Goat Boy wrote:I was sucked off by a catholic once and it was fucking RUBBISH.


I hope you informed his cardinal!
I've been talking about writing a book - 25 years of TEFL - for a few years now. I've got it in me.

Paid anghofio fod dy galon yn y chwyldro