The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 09 Feb 2018, 15:31

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 12 Feb 2018, 00:14

PADDOCK DIED AT NOON ON DAY AFTER SHOOTINGS?
http://fintandunne.blogspot.jp/2018/02/ ... -News.html

This is the Las Vegas shooter who supposedly killed himself when cops burst into his hotel room/snipers nest on the night of the shooting. But oddly the coroner's report clearly says Paddock's time of death was 12:00 which, in military time the way other times in the report are noted, means noon. There are some other anomalies in the link but this time of death issue is the oddest.
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 14 Feb 2018, 05:30

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 06 Apr 2018, 01:04

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 27 May 2018, 16:39

Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.

“I got to a place where I had to see Sirhan,” Kennedy said. He would not discuss the specifics of their conversation. But when it was over, Kennedy had joined those who believe there was a second gunman, and that it was not Sirhan who killed his father....


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ret ... 7d5bf7ca28
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 31 May 2018, 16:20

9/11 was a crime and not an act of war yet we went to war over it. Is it because the US is "exceptional?"

THE AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM MYTH AND THE SELLING OF U.S. DOMINATION

By Geoffrey O’Neill

Most Americans are unaware of the amount of human suffering the U.S. government has inflicted on others throughout the world, especially post 9/11. We are incessantly told it is our duty to support the troops and our leaders who invade, bomb or otherwise intervene in other nations. The motives offered might be to stop genocide, to take down a maniacal despot, or to spread democracy and American values. Our government purportedly acts with reluctance as well as with compassion, respect for others, and good intent. We are reminded that the troops keep us safe, all the while helping spread the American way of life to a needy world. Why? It is because we are “exceptional.”

https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2 ... /#comments
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Rayge
Posts: 13204
Joined: 14 Aug 2013, 11:37
Location: deepest Devon
Contact:

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Rayge » 31 May 2018, 16:30

Jimbo wrote:
Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.

“I got to a place where I had to see Sirhan,” Kennedy said. He would not discuss the specifics of their conversation. But when it was over, Kennedy had joined those who believe there was a second gunman, and that it was not Sirhan who killed his father....


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ret ... 7d5bf7ca28


Any chance you could copy that article and post it here Jimbo? It's effectively blocked for me on the WT site by demands for money and/or unblocking ads. Ta.
It was a long time ago, but, unlike the assassination of his brother, I do think there was a second shooter. I seem to remember (I researched it for an article I ended up not writing) that there were strong suspicions about one of the armed guards surrounding
RFK as he was ushered through the basement.
In timeless moments we live forever

You can't play a tune on an absolute

Negative Capability...when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact & reason”

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 31 May 2018, 17:05

There are much more comprehensive articles about it online but I guess you like your info mainstream. I'll copy it for you but there are some photos you'll miss. Hint. If you have another search engine such as Firefox they somehow manage to break the money wall.


Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.
by Tom Jackman May 26

LOS ANGELES — Just before Christmas, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pulled up to the massive Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, a California state prison complex in the desert outside San Diego that holds nearly 4,000 inmates. Kennedy was there to visit Sirhan B. Sirhan, the man convicted of killing his father, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, nearly 50 years ago.

While his wife, the actress Cheryl Hines, waited in the car, Kennedy met with Sirhan for three hours, he revealed to The Washington Post last week. It was the culmination of months of research by Kennedy into the assassination, including speaking with witnesses and reading the autopsy and police reports.

“I got to a place where I had to see Sirhan,” Kennedy said. He would not discuss the specifics of their conversation. But when it was over, Kennedy had joined those who believe there was a second gunman, and that it was not Sirhan who killed his father.

“I went there because I was curious and disturbed by what I had seen in the evidence,” said Kennedy, an environmental lawyer and the third oldest of his father’s 11 children. “I was disturbed that the wrong person might have been convicted of killing my father. My father was the chief law enforcement officer in this country. I think it would have disturbed him if somebody was put in jail for a crime they didn’t commit.”

Kennedy, 64, said he doesn’t know if his involvement in the case will change anything. But he now supports the call for a reinvestigation of the assassination — which is led by Paul Schrade, who also was shot in the head as he walked behind Kennedy in the pantry of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles but survived.

Kennedy was just 14 when he lost his father. Even now, people tell him how much Bobby Kennedy meant to them.

RFK’s death — five years after his brother, President John F. Kennedy, was gunned down in Dallas and two months after civil rights leader the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was killed in Memphis — devastated a country already beset by chaos.

[‘That stain of bloodshed’: After King’s assassination, RFK calmed an angry crowd with an unforgettable speech]

In 1968, the Vietnam War raged, American cities had erupted in riots after MLK’s assassination and tensions between war protesters and supporters were growing uglier. Robert F. Kennedy’s newly launched presidential bid had raised hopes that the New York Democrat and former attorney general could somehow unite a divided nation. The gunshots fired that June night changed all that.

Though Sirhan admitted at his trial in 1969 that he shot Kennedy, he claimed from the start that he had no memory of doing so. And midway through Sirhan’s trial, prosecutors provided his lawyers with an autopsy report that launched five decades of controversy: Kennedy was shot at point-blank range from behind, including a fatal shot behind his ear. But Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian immigrant, was standing in front of him.

Was there a second gunman? The debate rages to this day.

But the legal system has not entertained doubts. A jury convicted Sirhan of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death in 1969, which was commuted to a life term in 1972. Sirhan’s appeals have been rejected at every level, as recently as 2016, even with the courts considering new evidence that has emerged over the years that as many as 13 shots were fired — Sirhan’s gun held only eight bullets — and that Sirhan may have been subjected to coercive hypnosis, in a real-life version of “The Manchurian Candidate.”

His case is closed. His lawyers are now launching a long-shot bid to have the Inter-American Court of Human Rights hold an evidentiary hearing, while Schrade is hoping for a group such as the Innocence Project to take on the case. A spokesman for the Innocence Project said that the organization does not discuss cases at the consideration stage.

In the final court rejection of Sirhan’s appeals, U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich ruled, “Even if the second shooter’s bullet was the one that killed Senator Kennedy, [Sirhan] would be liable [for murder] as an aider and abettor.” And if Sirhan was unaware of the second shooter, Wistrich wrote that the scenario of a second gunman who shot Kennedy “at close range with the same type of gun and ammunition as [Sirhan] was using, but managed to escape the crowded room without notice of almost any of the roomful of witnesses, lacks any evidentiary support.”

‘Is everybody okay?’

On June 5, 1968, Kennedy had just won the California Democratic presidential primary and delivered a victory speech to a delirious crowd.

At 12:15 a.m., the 42-year-old candidate and Schrade left the celebration, walking through the hotel pantry en route to a news conference. Schrade was a regional director of the United Auto Workers who had helped Kennedy round up labor support, and Kennedy had singled him out for thanks in his victory speech moments earlier.

Schrade, now 93, still recalls the scene in the pantry vividly.

“He immediately started shaking hands” with kitchen workers, Schrade said of Kennedy. “The TV lights went on. I got hit. I didn’t know I was hit. I was shaking violently, and I fell. Then Bob fell. I saw flashes and heard crackling. The crackling actually was all the other bullets being fired.”

Witnesses reported that Kennedy said, “Is everybody okay? Is Paul all right?”

Kennedy was still conscious as his wife, Ethel, pregnant with their 11th child, rushed to his side. He lived for another day and died at 1:44 a.m. June 6, 1968.

[JFK assassination conspiracy theories: The grassy knoll, Umbrella Man, LBJ and Ted Cruz’s dad]

Schrade was shot above the forehead but the bullet bounced off his skull. Four other people, including ABC News producer William Weisel, were also wounded. All survived.

Sirhan was captured immediately; he had a .22-caliber revolver in his hand. Karl Uecker, an Ambassador Hotel maitre d’ who was escorting Kennedy through the pantry, testified that he grabbed Sirhan’s wrist and pinned it down after two shots and that Sirhan continued to fire wildly while being held down, never getting close to Kennedy. An Ambassador waiter and a Kennedy aide also said they tackled Sirhan after two or three shots.

Several other witnesses also said he was not close enough to place the gun against Kennedy’s back, where famed Los Angeles coroner Thomas Noguchi found powder burns on the senator’s jacket and on his hair, indicating shots fired at close contact. These witnesses provided more proof for those who insist a second gunman was involved.

The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office and the Los Angeles Police Department declined interviews on what both consider a closed case.

[Who killed Martin Luther King Jr.? His family believes James Earl Ray was framed.]

Schrade believes that Sirhan shot him and the others who were wounded but that he did not kill Kennedy. Since 1974, Schrade has led the crusade to try to persuade authorities — the police, prosecutors, the feds, anyone — to reinvestigate the case and identify the second gunman.

“Yes, he did shoot me. Yes, he shot four other people and aimed at Kennedy,” Schrade said in an interview at his Laurel Canyon home. “The important thing is he did not shoot Robert Kennedy. Why didn’t they go after the second gunman? They knew about him right away. They didn’t want to know who it was. They wanted a quickie.”

‘He never got near my father’

At trial, defense lawyer Grant Cooper made the decision not to contest the charge that Sirhan fired the fatal shot and instead tried to persuade the jury not to impose the death penalty by arguing Sirhan had “diminished capacity” and didn’t know what he was doing. It is a standard tactic by attorneys in death-penalty cases, but Cooper, who died in 1990, was widely criticized for not investigating the case before conceding guilt.

Sirhan is now 74 and approaching 50 years behind bars. After California’s courts abolished the death penalty in 1972, he was first made eligible for parole in 1986 but has been rejected repeatedly.

In 2016, Schrade spoke on Sirhan’s behalf at his parole hearing and apologized for not coming forward sooner to advocate for Sirhan’s release and exoneration.

California inmates are not permitted to give media interviews, and Sirhan did not respond to a letter from The Post. But his brother, Munir Sirhan, said Sirhan still hopes to be released and that his defense team probably hurt his case more than helped it.

There’s plenty of damning evidence against Sirhan. He confessed to the killing at trial, although he claims this was done on his attorney’s instruction. He took hours of target practice with his pistol earlier in the day, and he took the gun into the Ambassador Hotel that night. He had been seen at a Kennedy speech at the Ambassador two days earlier. He had a newspaper clipping critical of Kennedy in his pocket and had written “RFK must die” in notebooks at home, although he said he didn’t remember doing that. And he waited in the pantry for about 30 minutes, according to witnesses who said he asked if Kennedy would be coming through there.

[Lee Harvey Oswald’s chilling final hours before killing JFK]

But questions about the case arose almost immediately in Los Angeles, resulting in hearings and reinvestigations as early as 1971 by the district attorney, the police chief, the county board of supervisors and the county superior court. Many of them focused on the ballistics of the case, starting with Noguchi’s finding that Kennedy had been shot from behind, which Sirhan’s lawyer didn’t raise in his defense.

In addition, lead crime scene investigator DeWayne Wolfer testified at trial that a bullet taken from Kennedy’s body and bullets from two of the wounded victims all matched Sirhan’s gun.

But other experts who examined the three bullets said they had markings from different guns and different bullet manufacturers. An internal police document concluded that “Kennedy and Weisel bullets not fired from same gun” — Weisel was the wounded ABC News producer — and “Kennedy bullet not fired from Sirhan’s revolver.”

Evidence photographs of the gun used in the assassination plot to kill Sen. Robert F. Kennedy are displayed at Paul Schrade’s Los Angeles home. (Patrick T. Fallon for The Washington Post)

This prompted a Los Angeles judge in 1975 to convene a panel of seven forensic experts, who examined the three bullets and refired Sirhan’s gun. The panel said no match could be made between the three bullets, which appeared to be fired from the same gun, and Sirhan’s revolver. They found Wolfer had done a sloppy job with the ballistics evidence and urged further investigation.

In addition, witnesses said bullet holes were found in the door frames of the Ambassador’s pantry, and photos showed investigators examining the holes in the hours after the shooting. Between the three bullets that hit Kennedy and the bullets that hit the five wounded victims, Wolfer had accounted for all eight of Sirhan’s shots. Bullets in the doors would indicate a second gun. Wolfer later said the holes and the metal inside were not bullets, and the door frames were destroyed after the trial.

Though Los Angeles authorities had promised transparency in the case, the police and prosecutors refused to release their files until 1988, when they produced a flood of new evidence for researchers.

Among the material was an audiotape, first unearthed by CNN journalist Brad Johnson, which had been inadvertently made by Polish journalist Stanislaw Pruszynski in the Ambassador Hotel’s ballroom, and turned over to police in 1969.

Pruszynski’s microphone had been on the podium where Kennedy spoke, and TV footage shows him detaching it and moving toward the pantry as the shooting happens.

In 2005, audio engineer Philip Van Praag said the tape revealed that about 13 shots had been fired. He said he used technology similar to that of the ShotSpotter used by police to alert them to gunshots, and which differentiates gunshots from firecrackers or other loud bangs.

Charles Wright, a police technician, and Officer Robert Rozzi inspect a possible bullet hole in a door frame in a kitchen corridor of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. (Dick Strobel/AP)

Van Praag said recently that different guns create different resonances and that he was able to establish that two guns were fired, that they fired in different directions, and that some of the shot “impulses” were so close together they couldn’t have been fired by the same gun. He said he could not say “precisely” 13 shots but certainly more than the eight contained by Sirhan’s gun.

“There were too many bullets,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. “You can’t fire 13 shots out of an eight-shot gun.”

British author Mel Ayton wrote “The Forgotten Terrorist,” which posits that Sirhan killed Kennedy because he supported sending military firepower to Israel — the Sirhans were Christian Palestinians forced from their Jerusalem home by the Arab-Israeli War in 1948. He said Van Praag had misinterpreted the Pruszynski tape and that other experts who examined it show only eight “spikes,” one for each gunshot. Ayton also cited numerous eyewitnesses who said they heard at most eight shots.

Ayton and investigative reporter Dan Moldea, who also wrote a book about the assassination, argue that Sirhan’s gun could have reached Kennedy’s back. No witnesses saw the actual shots fired in the chaos of the pantry, and Moldea noted that Kennedy almost certainly turned and tried to protect himself after the first shot, which some said was preceded by Sirhan yelling, “Kennedy, you son of a bitch!”

“What were Kennedy’s last words?” Moldea asked during an interview. “‘How’s Paul?’ How would Kennedy know Paul had been injured if he had not been turned around. He turned around when Sirhan rushes towards him, yelling ‘you son of a bitch Kennedy.’ Kennedy’s not going to just stand there. He turns his back defensively.”

Moldea theorized that Schrade fell forward into Kennedy, pinning him against a table and pushing him into the muzzle of Sirhan’s gun, enabling him to fire four contact shots into Kennedy. One shot went through his jacket without hitting Kennedy, one went into his back and stopped below his neck, one went through his armpit and one went into his brain.

But Robert F. Kennedy Jr. doesn’t find those theories persuasive. “It’s not only that nobody saw that,” he said. “The people that were closest to [Sirhan], the people that disarmed him all said he never got near my father.”

Paul Schrade stands in the library named in his honor at the Robert F. Kennedy Community Schools in Los Angeles. Schrade survived being shot by Sirhan but believes a second gunman shot Kennedy. (Patrick T. Fallon for The Washington Post)

Schrade used an expletive to describe Moldea’s explanation and said he fell backward when he was shot above his forehead.

Both Ayton and Moldea assisted the California attorney general’s office in contesting Sirhan’s final appeal, and the government’s legal briefs cited the investigative work of both men.

Moldea had initially been a believer in the second-gunman theory, but after interviewing numerous police officers, witnesses and Sirhan, he concluded in his 1995 book, “The Killing of Robert F. Kennedy,” that Sirhan acted alone. He cited as additional proof a comment Sirhan reportedly made to a defense investigator about Kennedy turning his head before Sirhan shot him, a comment Sirhan strongly denied making.

More recently, Sirhan’s lawyers have explored whether he was hypnotized to begin shooting his gun when given a certain cue, even hiring a renowned expert in hypnosis from Harvard University to meet with Sirhan.

Wistrich, the judge, was completely dismissive of any suggestion of hypnosis. Schrade said the various theories of conspiracy and hypnotic programming are of little interest to him.

“I’m interested in finding out how the prosecutor convicted Sirhan with no evidence, knowing there was a second gunman,” Schrade said.

It was Schrade who persuaded Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to examine the evidence. “Once Schrade showed me the autopsy report,” Kennedy said, “then I didn’t feel like it was something I could just dismiss. Which is what I wanted to do.”

Kennedy called Sirhan’s trial “really a penalty hearing. It wasn’t a real trial. At a full trial, they would have litigated his guilt or innocence. I think it’s unfortunate that the case never went to a full trial because that would have compelled the press and prosecutors to focus on the glaring discrepancies in the narrative that Sirhan fired the shots that killed my father.”

Kennedy is not afraid to express controversial views. Last year, he and actor Robert De Niro held a news conference to argue that certain vaccines containing mercury are unsafe for some children. He said he is not opposed to all vaccines, but wants to make them safer.

Three of his sisters — former Maryland lieutenant governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, human rights activist Kerry Kennedy and filmmaker Rory Kennedy — declined to discuss the assassination or the case against Sirhan. Kennedy understands why.

“I think that, for most of my family members,” he said, “this is an issue that is still too painful to even talk about.”

It’s painful for him, too. Kennedy was asleep in his dorm at Georgetown Preparatory School in Bethesda, Md., on June 5, 1968, when a priest woke him and told there was a car waiting outside to take him to the family home, Hickory Hill, in McLean, Va. The priest didn’t say why.

In his new memoir, “American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family,” Kennedy said his mother’s secretary was waiting for him. “Jinx Hack told me my father had been shot, but I was still thinking he’d be okay. He was, after all, indestructible.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his older sister Kathleen and brother Joe flew to Los Angeles on Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey’s plane, Air Force Two.

At Good Samaritan Hospital, Kennedy wrote, his father’s head was bandaged and his face was bruised. A priest had already delivered last rites. His mother was there.

“I sat down across the bed from her and took hold of his big wrestler’s hand,” he wrote. “I prayed and said goodbye to him, listening to the pumps that kept him breathing. Each of us children took turns sitting with him and praying opposite my mom.

“My dad died at 1:44 a.m., a few minutes after doctors removed his life support. My brother Joe came into the ward where all the children were lying down and told us, ‘He’s gone.’ ”

Members of the Kennedy family, including Ethel, clutching a rosary, kneel at Robert F. Kennedy’s grave in Arlington National Cemetery on Nov. 20, 1970, to mark what would have been his 45th birthday. (AP)
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 31 May 2018, 17:28

You know about the conspiracies about JFK and RFK but not about JFK Jr. Considering how he was a possible challenger to George W. Bush his plane crash death was a little too convenient. The video's argument is very compelling.

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 66721
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Diamond Dog » 01 Jun 2018, 13:03

Jimbo wrote:You know about the conspiracies about JFK and RFK but not about JFK Jr. Considering how he was a possible challenger to George W. Bush his plane crash death was a little too convenient. The video's argument is very compelling.


I rather doubt that.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 24 Jul 2018, 18:41

Jimbo wrote:
First of all I don't need counter evidence. The burden of proof is on you, the accuser.

Davey: “Unless we are talking about 9/11. But since acknowledging the inconsistency of my arguments isn’t going to help me here - take that question to the other thread!”


Officially 9/11 is a closed case. There are many, however, who'd like a new hearing and so have been gathering evidence, much is scientific, witnesses, victim family members, scholars, writers, computer geeks, pilots, military, lawyers, clergy, compete nuts, too who have evidence to debunk the official story. And so, yeah, we have a case and hard evidence to back it up - but just not a chance to show it in a US court to an ordinary jury. We have defendants too like Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, There have already been a number of mock tribunes but held in the places like Malaysia. So damn right, we think that given a fair hearing we could find the US government responsible for 9/11. It should have been the US who tried 9/11 properly in the first place. After all, it was a crime but treated instead like an act of war. Because we wanted a war! But instead of a proper investigation they gave it a whitewash, No one went to jail. No one paid a fine. Instead we have a mock, brutal prison in Cuba for accused, tangentially connected characters - still waiting for proper trials! . So, if ever the day comes when some brave leader, a supreme court judge, say, cuts the 9/11 truthers some slack and allows it make its case, undoubtedly, before a proper jury, we'd win. We don't have flimsy assertions we have fucking hard evidence that what we were told happened on that day is a crock of shit. How two buildings could fall through the path of most resistance is all I need to say, yeah, it was an inside job.

In some good conspiracy news there is an American lawyer who lives in Copenhagen and was contacted for help by the mother of the surviving "Boston bomber" waiting for execution on death row. His trial was a sham and he should be freed. Apparently one judge believes the story and is working to get the kid a retrial.
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 66721
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Diamond Dog » 24 Jul 2018, 18:49

Who are "we"?
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 25 Jul 2018, 05:59

Diamond Dog wrote:Who are "we"?


A consensus of 9/11 truthers.

http://www.consensus911.org/
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 15883
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby bobzilla77 » 26 Jul 2018, 00:22

00000
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
Pansy Puff
Posts: 8740
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 21:10
Location: Under the watchful eye of the Clive police

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Pansy Puff » 26 Aug 2018, 18:51

To be clear I do NOT believe Prince was suicidal; I do not believe Prince was intentionally taking fentanyl; and I do not believe Prince took fentanyl on 20160420-21 in an attempt to take his own. Life. Instead I believe at least one person visited Prince that night and caused the overdose with the intention of taking Princeís life. And then his clothes were removed and put on backwards to claim this death as a ritual death for satanic purposes. However I also believe Prince had been a committed Christian in the last part of his life.

And let's not forget his last Instragram "Just when you thought you were safe" (deleted soon after his death). Prince did not feel safe. He knew certain people wanted him dead. Prince was not suicidal. Prince was intentionally poisoned
.
The Happy Mondays were disqualified from a special edition of the BBC’s Bargain Hunt after Bez broke the show’s rules by artificially inflating prices, handing victory to Pulp.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 11 Sep 2018, 15:20

September 11. 2018

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
THE SMOOTH SOUL STYLINGS OF SUMPTUOUS SI
hounds people off the board
Posts: 18616
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: bit reliant on prawns

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby THE SMOOTH SOUL STYLINGS OF SUMPTUOUS SI » 13 Sep 2018, 01:28

GoogaMooga wrote:I've been GoogaMooga everywhere since I went online in 2005. There are copycats on the web incl a Brooklyn Food Festival, who have even adopted my camel case "M".

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 18 Sep 2018, 04:11

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15468
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 01 Oct 2018, 02:08

Every year more and more official story disbelievers appear debunking the seminal false flag attack of our time - the narrative of which is being memory-holed as we sit on our asses and write about acceptable nonsense. Kudos to Off-Guardian!

https://off-guardian.org/2018/09/30/a-c ... -articles/

September 30, 2018
A compilation of OffGuardian’s 17th anniversary 911 articles

Every year on OffG we use the month of September as a reminder of the events of 9/11 2001, and the still unanswered questions pertaining.

We tend to be attacked for this from some quarters, and we understand many other alt news sites prefer to remain silent on tis controversy. The subject has been so successfully propagandised in the mainstream that anyone raising even the most rational and well-supported doubts about the official theory of what happened that day call too easily be dismissed as a lunatic.

But we made an editorial decision two years ago not to let that deter us. After all, if we’re here to challenge prevailing narratives, how can we ignore one of the most impactful prevailing, and poorly substantiated, narratives of the 21st century?

This year we published a number of general overviews, including Graeme MacQueen’s quick and cogent summary of why what happened that day continues to be a crucial issue for
The 9/11 anniversary: Conspiracy theory or critical thinking?

And retired firefighter Greg Bacon’s perspective on some of the apparent physical anomalies involved in the official story:
9/11 – A Firefighter’s Perspective

We published three contrasting reviews of the scholarly new study 911 Unmasked, by David Ray Griffin & Elizabeth Woodworth:
Book Reviews: 9/11 Unmasked

One of these was by Philip Roddis, until recently a believer in the official story, who recommended “for all who deem, as I had, the 9/11 truther case too daft for serious consideration. Buy this book“:
Incontrovertible – the “truth” about 9/11

This very honest admission of a change of mind elicited a response from one of the authors of the book, David Ray Griffin:
9/11 Unmasked: A Remarkable Review

The book itself became a focus of controversy when the online seller Amazon persisted in listing the book as “out of stock”, “temporarily unavailable” or with long predicted delays in shipping dates (1-3 months), despite having the book in stock and ready for dispatch:
Amazon Censorship of 9/11 Unmasked?
The Suppression of Truth in the Land of Lies: An Oxymoron
UPDATED: Amazon UK caught actively blocking purchase of new 9/11 book?

We conclude our coverage today with a look at Reddit’s decision to “quarantine” its 9/11 Truth board.
Reddit “Quarantines” 9/11 Truth Board

You can read all our 911 articles at : https://off-guardian.org/category/911
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 12089
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Sneelock » 01 Oct 2018, 02:15

Thanks for posting since I can’t find my secret decoder ring.
scan not a friend with a microscopic glass