The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 67070
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Diamond Dog » 24 Jul 2018, 18:49

Who are "we"?
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15540
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 25 Jul 2018, 05:59

Diamond Dog wrote:Who are "we"?


A consensus of 9/11 truthers.

http://www.consensus911.org/
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 15919
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby bobzilla77 » 26 Jul 2018, 00:22

00000
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15540
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 11 Sep 2018, 15:20

September 11. 2018

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
DRUGS SNAKE
hounds people off the board
Posts: 19200
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: selling a self-detonating James Last CD to a Copenhagen thrift store

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby DRUGS SNAKE » 13 Sep 2018, 01:28

Ghost of Harry Smith wrote:I have no idea what this thread is trying to achieve.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15540
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 18 Sep 2018, 04:11

Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15540
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 01 Oct 2018, 02:08

Every year more and more official story disbelievers appear debunking the seminal false flag attack of our time - the narrative of which is being memory-holed as we sit on our asses and write about acceptable nonsense. Kudos to Off-Guardian!

https://off-guardian.org/2018/09/30/a-c ... -articles/

September 30, 2018
A compilation of OffGuardian’s 17th anniversary 911 articles

Every year on OffG we use the month of September as a reminder of the events of 9/11 2001, and the still unanswered questions pertaining.

We tend to be attacked for this from some quarters, and we understand many other alt news sites prefer to remain silent on tis controversy. The subject has been so successfully propagandised in the mainstream that anyone raising even the most rational and well-supported doubts about the official theory of what happened that day call too easily be dismissed as a lunatic.

But we made an editorial decision two years ago not to let that deter us. After all, if we’re here to challenge prevailing narratives, how can we ignore one of the most impactful prevailing, and poorly substantiated, narratives of the 21st century?

This year we published a number of general overviews, including Graeme MacQueen’s quick and cogent summary of why what happened that day continues to be a crucial issue for
The 9/11 anniversary: Conspiracy theory or critical thinking?

And retired firefighter Greg Bacon’s perspective on some of the apparent physical anomalies involved in the official story:
9/11 – A Firefighter’s Perspective

We published three contrasting reviews of the scholarly new study 911 Unmasked, by David Ray Griffin & Elizabeth Woodworth:
Book Reviews: 9/11 Unmasked

One of these was by Philip Roddis, until recently a believer in the official story, who recommended “for all who deem, as I had, the 9/11 truther case too daft for serious consideration. Buy this book“:
Incontrovertible – the “truth” about 9/11

This very honest admission of a change of mind elicited a response from one of the authors of the book, David Ray Griffin:
9/11 Unmasked: A Remarkable Review

The book itself became a focus of controversy when the online seller Amazon persisted in listing the book as “out of stock”, “temporarily unavailable” or with long predicted delays in shipping dates (1-3 months), despite having the book in stock and ready for dispatch:
Amazon Censorship of 9/11 Unmasked?
The Suppression of Truth in the Land of Lies: An Oxymoron
UPDATED: Amazon UK caught actively blocking purchase of new 9/11 book?

We conclude our coverage today with a look at Reddit’s decision to “quarantine” its 9/11 Truth board.
Reddit “Quarantines” 9/11 Truth Board

You can read all our 911 articles at : https://off-guardian.org/category/911
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 12237
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Sneelock » 01 Oct 2018, 02:15

Thanks for posting since I can’t find my secret decoder ring.
I am not a robot.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 15540
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 13 Oct 2018, 16:21

This is stunning info.



Shownotes
If anyone wants to learn more about this aspect of 9/11, I have a lot of articles on my blog (http://shoestring911.blogspot.com) that deal with the training exercises taking place on the day of 9/11 or that took place in the run-up to 9/11. These include:

"Rehearsing 9/11: How Training Exercises Foretold the Attacks of September 11":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2009/ ... cises.html

"NORAD Exercise a Year Before 9/11 Simulated a Pilot Trying to Crash a Plane into a New York Skyscraper--The United Nations Headquarters":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2010/ ... e-911.html

"Air Defense Exercise a Month Before 9/11 Was Based Around Osama Bin Laden Carrying Out an Aerial Attack on Washington":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2015/ ... e-911.html

"United Airlines Held an Exercise So Realistic That Its Personnel Had to Be Reassured That the 9/11 Attacks Were 'Not a Drill'":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2015/ ... se-so.html

"Army Command Center at the Pentagon Planned to Hold Exercise in Week After
9/11 Based on a Plane Hitting the WTC":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2011/ ... anned.html

"'Real-World or Exercise': Did the U.S. Military Mistake the 9/11 Attacks for a Training Scenario?":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2012/ ... itary.html

"On 9/11, the U.S. Military Was Preparing for a Simulated Nuclear War":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2011/ ... g-for.html

"Targeting the President: Evidence of U.S. Government Training Exercises on 9/11":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2014/ ... of-us.html

"'Let's Get Rid of This Goddamn Sim': How NORAD Radar Screens Displayed False Tracks All Through the 9/11 Attacks":
http://shoestring911.blogspot.com/2010/ ... m-how.html

For even more details of the 9/11-related exercises, check out the following two pages from the Complete 9/11 Timeline:

"Military Exercises Up to 9/11":
http://www.historycommons.org/timeline. ... yExercises

"Training Exercises on 9/11":
http://www.historycommons.org/timeline. ... _exercises
Some say the glass is half-empty others half-full. I say. "Lemme see that glass!"