The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

in reality, all of this has been a total load of old bollocks
User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 15 Oct 2016, 09:47

I just Googled "Pepe Escobar 9/11" and this probing Asia Times article appeared.


THE ROVING EYE
Fifty questions on 9/11
By Pepe Escobar

It's September 11 all over again - eight years on. The George W Bush administration is out. The "global war on terror" is still on, renamed "overseas contingency operations" by the Barack Obama administration. Obama's "new strategy" - a war escalation - is in play in AfPak. Osama bin Laden may be dead or not. "Al-Qaeda" remains a catch-all ghost entity. September 11 - the neo-cons' "new Pearl Harbor" - remains the darkest jigsaw puzzle of the young 21st century.

It's useless to expect US corporate media and the ruling elites' political operatives to call for a true, in-depth investigation into the attacks on the US on September 11, 2001. Whitewash has been the norm. But even establishment highlight Dr Zbig "Grand Chessboard" Brzezinski, a former national security advisor, has admitted to the US Senate that the post-9/11 "war on terror" is a "mythical historical narrative".

The following questions, some multi-part - and most totally ignored by the 9/11 Commission - are just the tip of the immense 9/11 iceberg. A hat tip goes to the indefatigable work of 911truth.org; whatreallyhappened.com; architects and engineers for 9/11 truth; the Italian documentary Zero: an investigation into 9/11; and Asia Times Online readers' e-mails.

None of these questions has been convincingly answered - according to the official narrative. It's up to US civil society to keep up the pressure. Eight years after the fact, one fundamental conclusion is imperative. The official narrative edifice of 9/11 is simply not acceptable.

Fifty questions
1) How come dead or not dead Osama bin Laden has not been formally indicted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as responsible for 9/11? Is it because the US government - as acknowledged by the FBI itself - has not produced a single conclusive piece of evidence?

2) How could all the alleged 19 razor-blade box cutter-equipped Muslim perpetrators have been identified in less than 72 hours - without even a crime scene investigation?

3) How come none of the 19's names appeared on the passenger lists released the same day by both United Airlines and American Airlines?

4) How come eight names on the "original" FBI list happened to be found alive and living in different countries?

5) Why would pious jihadi Mohammed Atta leave a how-to-fly video manual, a uniform and his last will inside his bag knowing he was on a suicide mission?

6) Why did Mohammed Atta study flight simulation at Opa Locka, a hub of no less than six US Navy training bases?

7) How could Mohammed Atta's passport have been magically found buried among the Word Trade Center (WTC)'s debris when not a single flight recorder was found? (Some truthers bicker over this point. The passport was found in plain sight in the sidewalk. Jimbo)

8) Who is in the possession of the "disappeared" eight indestructible black boxes on those four flights?

9) Considering multiple international red alerts about a possible terrorist attack inside the US - including former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice's infamous August 6, 2001, memo - how come four hijacked planes deviating from their computerized flight paths and disappearing from radar are allowed to fly around US airspace for more than an hour and a half - not to mention disabling all the elaborate Pentagon's defense systems in the process?

10) Why the secretary of the US Air Force James Roche did not try to intercept both planes hitting the WTC (only seven minutes away from McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey) as well as the Pentagon (only 10 minutes away from McGuire)? Roche had no less than 75 minutes to respond to the plane hitting the Pentagon.
11) Why did George W Bush continue to recite "My Pet Goat" in his Florida school and was not instantly absconded by the secret service?

12) How could Bush have seen the first plane crashing on WTC live - as he admitted? Did he have previous knowledge - or is he psychic?

13) Bush said that he and Andrew Card initially thought the first hit on the WTC was an accident with a small plane. How is that possible when the FAA as well as NORAD already knew this was about a hijacked plane?

14) What are the odds of transponders in four different planes be turned off almost simultaneously, in the same geographical area, very close to the nation's seat of power in Washington, and no one scrambles to contact the Pentagon or the media?

15) Could defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld explain why initial media reports said that there were no fighter jets available at Andrews Air Force Base and then change the reports that there were, but not on high alert?

16) Why was the DC Air National Guard in Washington AWOL on 9/11?

17) Why did combat jet fighters of the 305th Air Wing, McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey not intercept the second hijacked plane hitting the WTC, when they could have done it within seven minutes?

18) Why did none of the combat jet fighters of the 459th Aircraft Squadron at Andrews Air Force Base intercept the plane that hit the Pentagon, only 16 kilometers away? And since we're at it, why the Pentagon did not release the full video of the hit?

19) A number of very experienced airline pilots - including US ally Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a former fighter jet pilot - revealed that, well, only crack pilots could have performed such complex maneuvers on the hijacked jets, while others insisted they could only have been accomplished by remote control. Is it remotely believable that the hijackers were up to the task?

20) How come a substantial number of witnesses did swear seeing and hearing multiple explosions in both towers of the WTC?

21) How come a substantial number of reputed architects and engineers are adamant that the official narrative simply does not explain the largest structural collapse in recorded history (the Twin Towers) as well as the collapse of WTC building 7, which was not even hit by a jet?

22) According to Frank de Martini, WTC's construction manager, "We designed the building to resist the impact of one or more jetliners." The second plane nearly missed tower 1; most of the fuel burned in an explosion outside the tower. Yet this tower collapsed first, long before tower 2 that was "perforated" by the first hit. Jet fuel burned up fast - and by far did not reach the 2000-degree heat necessary to hurt the six tubular steel columns in the center of the tower - designed specifically to keep the towers from collapsing even if hit by a Boeing 707. A Boeing 707 used to carry more fuel than the Boeing 757 and Boeing 767 that actually hit the towers.

23) Why did Mayor Rudolph Giuliani instantly authorized the shipment of WTC rubble to China and India for recycling?

24) Why was metallic debris found no less than 13 kilometers from the crash site of the plane that went down in Pennsylvania? Was the plane in fact shot down - under vice president Dick Cheney's orders?

25) The Pipelineistan question. What did US ambassador Wendy Chamberlain talk about over the phone on October 10, 2001, with the oil minister of Pakistan? Was it to tell him that the 1990s-planned Unocal gas pipeline project, TAP (Turkmenistan/Afghanistan/ Pakistan), abandoned because of Taliban demands on transit fees, was now back in business? (Two months later, an agreement to build the pipeline was signed between the leaders of the three countries).

26) What is former Unocal lobbyist and former Bush pet Afghan Zalmay Khalilzad up to in Afghanistan?

27) How come former Pakistani foreign minister Niaz Niak said in mid-July 2001 that the US had already decided to strike against Osama bin Laden and the Taliban by October? The topic was discussed secretly at the July Group of Eight summit in Genoa, Italy, according to Pakistani diplomats.

28) How come US ambassador to Yemen Barbara Bodine told FBI agent John O'Neill in July 2001 to stop investigating al-Qaeda's financial operations - with O'Neill instantly moved to a security job at the WTC, where he died on 9/11?

29) Considering the very intimate relationship between the Taliban and Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and the ISI and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), is Bin Laden alive, dead or still a valuable asset of the ISI, the CIA or both?

30) Was Bin Laden admitted at the American hospital in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates on July 4, 2001, after flying from Quetta, Pakistan, and staying for treatment until July 11?

31) Did the Bin Laden group build the caves of Tora Bora in close cooperation with the CIA during the 1980s' anti-Soviet jihad?

32) How come General Tommy Franks knew for sure that Bin Laden was hiding in Tora Bora in late November 2001?

33) Why did president Bill Clinton abort a hit on Bin Laden in October 1999? Why did then-Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf abort a covert ops in the same date? And why did Musharraf do the same thing again in August 2001?

34) Why did George W Bush dissolve the Bin Laden Task Force nine months before 9/11?

35) How come the (fake) Bin Laden home video - in which he "confesses" to being the perpetrator of 9/11 - released by the US on December 13, 2001, was found only two weeks after it was produced (on November 9); was it really found in Jalalabad (considering Northern Alliance and US troops had not even arrived there at the time); by whom; and how come the Pentagon was forced to release a new translation after the first (botched) one?

36) Why was ISI chief Lieutenant General Mahmud Ahmad abruptly "retired" on October 8, 2001, the day the US started bombing Afghanistan?

37) What was Ahmad up to in Washington exactly on the week of 9/11 (he arrived on September 4)? On the morning of 9/11, Ahmad was having breakfast on Capitol Hill with Bob Graham and Porter Goss, both later part of the 9/11 Commission, which simply refused to investigate two of its members. Ahmad had breakfast with Richard Armitage of the State Department on September 12 and 13 (when Pakistan negotiated its "cooperation" with the "war on terror") and met all the CIA and Pentagon top brass. On September 13, Musharraf announced he would send Ahmad to Afghanistan to demand to the Taliban the extradition of Bin Laden.
38) Who inside the ISI transferred US$100,000 to Mohammed Atta in the summer of 2001 - under orders of Ahmad himself, as Indian intelligence insists? Was it really ISI asset Omar Sheikh, Bin Laden's information technology specialist who later organized the slaying of American journalist Daniel Pearl in Karachi? So was the ISI directly linked to 9/11?

39) Did the FBI investigate the two shady characters who met Mohammed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi in Harry's Bar at the Helmsley Hotel in New York City on September 8, 2001?

40) What did director of Asian affairs at the State Department Christina Rocca and the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan Abdul Salam Zaeef discuss in their meeting in Islamabad in August 2001?

41) Did Washington know in advance that an "al-Qaeda" connection would kill Afghan nationalist commander Ahmad Shah Massoud, aka "The Lion of the Panjshir", only two days before 9/11? Massoud was fighting the Taliban and al-Qaeda - helped by Russia and Iran. According to the Northern Alliance, Massoud was killed by an ISI-Taliban-al Qaeda axis. If still alive, he would never have allowed the US to rig a loya jirga (grand council) in Afghanistan and install a puppet, former CIA asset Hamid Karzai, as leader of the country.

42) Why did it take no less than four months before the name of Ramzi Binalshibh surfaced in the 9/11 context, considering the Yemeni was a roommate of Mohammed Atta in his apartment cell in Hamburg?

43) Is pathetic shoe-bomber Richard Reid an ISI asset?

44) Did then-Russian president Vladimir Putin and Russian intelligence tell the CIA in 2001 that 25 terrorist pilots had been training for suicide missions?

45) When did the head of German intelligence, August Hanning, tell the CIA that terrorists were "planning to hijack commercial aircraft?"

46) When did Egyptian President Mubarak tell the CIA about an attack on the US with an "airplane stuffed with explosives?"

47) When did Israel's Mossad director Efraim Halevy tell the CIA about a possible attack on the US by "200 terrorists?"

48) Were the Taliban aware of the warning by a Bush administration official as early as February 2001 - "Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs?"

49) Has Northrop-Grumman used Global Hawk technology - which allows to remotely control unmanned planes - in the war in Afghanistan since October 2001? Did it install Global Hawk in a commercial plane? Is Global Hawk available at all for commercial planes?

50) Would Cheney stand up and volunteer the detailed timeline of what he was really up to during the whole day on 9/11?

Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. His new book, just out, is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).

He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com.
I love you.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 36442
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: Gringolandia

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Count Machuki » 25 Oct 2016, 18:43

https://pepethefrogfaith.wordpress.com/

I’ll cut right to the chase:
Pepe the Frog isn’t a white nationalist symbol.
Pepe the Frog isn’t a harmless meme propagated by teenagers on the internet.
Pepe the Frog is, in fact, the modern-day avatar of an ancient Egyptian deity accidentally resurrected by online imageboard culture.
Does that sound like the most b@tsh#t crazy thing you’ve ever heard?
Strap in, friendo. You’re in for one hell of a ride.




JIMMMMMBOOOOOO

ALSO raaaayyygeee THERE'S SOME CHAOS MAGICK STUFF UP IN THERE
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Rayge
Posts: 9999
Joined: 14 Aug 2013, 11:37
Location: deepest Devon
Contact:

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Rayge » 25 Oct 2016, 19:01

Count Machuki wrote:ALSO raaaayyygeee THERE'S SOME CHAOS MAGICK STUFF UP IN THERE


Not my field, man.
You can't play a tune on an absolute

When the ball sleeps it dreams it is a Frisbee

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Love is the law, love under will

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 36442
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: Gringolandia

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Count Machuki » 25 Oct 2016, 19:06

Ah, got it. ps...I'm about to send you a Facebook request. I'm me.
Let's never fight about post-Korean War R&B, ok?
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 30 Oct 2016, 18:58

These clips are from my all-time most respected 9/11 film The New Pearl Harbor. It is a five hour film and I've watched it at least four times. This is the first time I've found it broken up into smaller parts, cogent chapters actually.

Think how almost everything you are told by the media and from the US government itself are lies and shams. I mean how the elections are run, the electronic snooping, the imprisonment and torture of whistleblowers, how our wars are fought, how we are arming terrorists, bailing out banks, clawing money back from veterans, fucking everything is a lie. So don't believe what the media says about 9/11 as true. Here are some lies 9/11 exposed.










It seems like the site hasn't broken down the entire film yet. You can watch the whole thing in three long parts if you YouTube The New Pearl Harbor.
I love you.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 03 Nov 2016, 16:59

Got this suggested to me by the Corbett Report who used a bit of the video in a bit about what may have happened in the RFK assassination. It's a UK reality show featuring a famous hypnotist who hypnotizes a regular guy to assassinate a famous celebrity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_7LRrwjmYk



Just thinking how I think I would be a poor candidate for hypnosis because my body does almost nothing my will or anyone else says it should. Could it be I know the "truth" and the rest of you don't see it because you are under some kind of mass hypnosis? Maybe all conspiracy theorists would be poor subjects for the hypnotist. The words "conspiracy theorist" were actually coined by the CIA to describe the JFK researchers and disbelievers in the official story. Maybe "conspiracy theorist" is your trigger that shuts down your critical thinking because I think you are suffering from some kind of blindness for not seeing what I see. Just watching the way the towers fell is an absolute giveaway to seeing that 9/11 is a set up job but all you "skeptics" react like zombies the way you reject what is right before your eyes.
I love you.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 16 Nov 2016, 06:20

Hey, Canadians, wake up!

We Need a Public inquiry into the 2014 Ottawa Shootings

Hamilton Spectator

By Graeme MacQueen

On Oct. 22, 2014, Hamilton’s Cpl. Nathan Cirillo, standing guard at the National War Memorial in Ottawa, was shot to death. The perpetrator, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, then entered the Centre Block of Parliament with his loaded rifle, creating the worst security breach on Parliament Hill in Canada’s history.

Cirillo lost his life, and his family and friends suffered grievously. The repercussions of the event, however, go beyond this. Stephen Harper’s government used this attack, as well as an assault on two soldiers on Oct. 20, 2014 in Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, near Montreal, to push Bill C-51 through Parliament. This controversial bill, now law in Canada, gives intelligence agencies increased power and diminishes the civil rights of Canadians.

On Oct. 22, 2014, CBC news anchor Peter Mansbridge said that Canadian journalists, as well as members of Parliament, would relentlessly investigate the attack. This has not happened. Instead, the anniversary of Cirillo’s death has been used as an occasion for flag waving, even though key questions about the case have not been answered.

If the perpetrator had lived, there would have been a public trial and the central facts would have been disclosed. But when security forces killed Zehaf-Bibeau they ended the possibility of a trial.

We have not even had an inquest. Ontario’s chief coroner could have ordered an inquest into the death of Mr. Cirillo or the death of Zehaf-Bibeau but has not done so.

In 2015, several police reports related to this case were released, but these did not ever raise the most important questions, much less answer them.

How was this homeless man able to buy the car that was crucial to his crime? Since he was evidently a good planner, why did he take the risk of driving this car for three hours on the highway without licence plates? Since he had a police record that prohibited him from purchasing firearms, how did he get hold of a rifle? Where did he acquire his bullets and knife? Why did police initially confirm that there had been more than one perpetrator? Why did the RCMP commissioner say there had been “no advance warning” when the evidence suggests there were at least six warnings? Why was the B.C. legislature taking precautions because of these warnings while security forces in Ottawa were caught flat-footed? Why did security forces find it necessary to shoot Zehaf-Bibeau 31 times? Was he wearing body armour in Centre Block as some have claimed and, if so, where did he get it?

There is a troubling lack of transparency about the government’s treatment of these events. Canadians have a right know that their physical security and the security of members of their armed forces, such as Corporal Cirillo, are being honestly addressed. They also have a right to see the evidence in a case where inroads are being made on their civil rights. The fact that a police killing has prevented a trial from taking place is no excuse for withholding evidence from the public.

We need a public inquiry into the events of Oct. 22, 2014.

https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2 ... /#comments

http://www.thespec.com/opinion-story/69 ... shootings/
I love you.

User avatar
The Great Defector
Posts: 14258
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 18:16

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby The Great Defector » 23 Nov 2016, 16:54

Shake things up a little.


Lee Harvey Oswald’s little green book shows JFK wasn't the real target


http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/
fueryIre wrote:Deluded by the belief that what is said on chat boards reflects reality or carries any kind of weight in the day-to-day world

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 36442
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: Gringolandia

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Count Machuki » 07 Dec 2016, 15:58

:o

I used to go to all ages rock shows at Comet Ping Pong and Pizza.

Now, I started to ask Jimbo if his people are really serious about this bullshit, but HELL, there it is in black and white.
Dude* walks into a family hangout/birthday party/neighborhood band spot with guns. Ready to kill.
Because Hillary Clinton is running a child enslavement ring out of the back room.
Of the pizza parlor. Buying and selling children.
At the ping pong spot.

Get the fuck out of here* with this shit!
:x





*not Jimbo
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
The Great Defector
Posts: 14258
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 18:16

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby The Great Defector » 07 Dec 2016, 17:29

fueryIre wrote:Deluded by the belief that what is said on chat boards reflects reality or carries any kind of weight in the day-to-day world

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 07 Dec 2016, 17:55

Count Machuki wrote::o

I used to go to all ages rock shows at Comet Ping Pong and Pizza.

Now, I started to ask Jimbo if his people are really serious about this bullshit, but HELL, there it is in black and white.
Dude* walks into a family hangout/birthday party/neighborhood band spot with guns. Ready to kill.
Because Hillary Clinton is running a child enslavement ring out of the back room.
Of the pizza parlor. Buying and selling children.
At the ping pong spot.

Get the fuck out of here* with this shit!
:x
*not Jimbo


Not following this one.

But talk about fake news, in that very article is this; "After Podesta’s emails were hacked (likely by Russian agents)" which is itself fake news. I showed you in the election thread how even Snopes says: "Although the DNC has blamed Russia for a computer network security breach, little surrounding the hack has been confirmed or verified." How fucking "likely" does that sound? Even Obama says it wasn't the Russians. C'mon, all the dirt in those emails. They have to lie. Uh ... uh ... it was them Russkies that done it! I hope you can you see the irony here. An article about this new meme, "fake news," which itself contains more fake news!

The public is being gaslighted big time my friend. Fake news. Fake news. Fake news.
I love you.

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 07 Dec 2016, 18:50

An excellent article about "fake news" and how the mainstream media, by not exposing their own establishment's dark secrets, their news is as fake and dangerous as any "fake news" source. A case of pot calling the kettle black sort of thing.

http://www.medialens.org/index.php/aler ... ramid.html
I love you.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 36442
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: Gringolandia

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Count Machuki » 07 Dec 2016, 21:47

Jimbo wrote:
Count Machuki wrote: :o

I used to go to all ages rock shows at Comet Ping Pong and Pizza.

Now, I started to ask Jimbo if his people are really serious about this bullshit, but HELL, there it is in black and white.
Dude* walks into a family hangout/birthday party/neighborhood band spot with guns. Ready to kill.
Because Hillary Clinton is running a child enslavement ring out of the back room.
Of the pizza parlor. Buying and selling children.
At the ping pong spot.

Get the fuck out of here* with this shit!
:x
*not Jimbo


Not following this one.


Only so much time in the day, I guess. Wouldn't want to invest in a false lead. Did you read the article?

Here's another:

Sandy Hook denier indicted for threatening parent of child victim

Twenty-odd first graders. Not grief actors.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 08 Dec 2016, 02:29

Count Machuki wrote:
Jimbo wrote:
Count Machuki wrote: :o

I used to go to all ages rock shows at Comet Ping Pong and Pizza.

Now, I started to ask Jimbo if his people are really serious about this bullshit, but HELL, there it is in black and white.
Dude* walks into a family hangout/birthday party/neighborhood band spot with guns. Ready to kill.
Because Hillary Clinton is running a child enslavement ring out of the back room.
Of the pizza parlor. Buying and selling children.
At the ping pong spot.

Get the fuck out of here* with this shit!
:x
*not Jimbo


Not following this one.


Only so much time in the day, I guess. Wouldn't want to invest in a false lead. Did you read the article?

Here's another:

Sandy Hook denier indicted for threatening parent of child victim

Twenty-odd first graders. Not grief actors.


I skimmed the Pizzagate article and agree, of course, no one should take a conspiracy theory so seriously they will resort to the gun. But if the mainstream media wants to be taken more seriously, stop the one in a million nut with a gun, and if they wish to recapture the droves who are fleeing them for these so-called fake news sites, then they need to take more seriously the more substantive angles conspiracy researchers come up with and not just that heart-tugging crap Sandy Hook example you have chosen to mock conspiracy theorists. If the Daily News went to the source and actually read some of the scoops the Sandy Hook researchers have found - or did some investigative journalism themselves - they might get some of their readers back. Instead, the sneaky way Sandy Hook is portrayed is like them explaining WWII saying lots of people died and we should be sad. Note how your Sandy Hook article mentions not a whit about any details which may have set off the "threatener." I've read SH stuff and it is compelling and plausible. But the Daily News is lazy and only refers back to what they have already written which fits neatly with the government version of events.

And while I may have not delved into Pizzagate there is a trove of pedophilia ring stories which go unremarked by or scoffed at by the mainstream news because so often important and respectable people are involved. This one you should appreciate, Count. It involves Republicans.

I love you.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 36442
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: Gringolandia

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Count Machuki » 08 Dec 2016, 14:06

Jimbo wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:
Twenty-odd first graders. Not grief actors.


[T]hat heart-tugging crap Sandy Hook example you have chosen to mock conspiracy theorists.


[hearttuggingcrap]You're a father. Do you remember you son when he was a first grader?[/hearttuggingcrap]
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 08 Dec 2016, 17:57

Count Machuki wrote:
Jimbo wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:
Twenty-odd first graders. Not grief actors.


[T]hat heart-tugging crap Sandy Hook example you have chosen to mock conspiracy theorists.


[hearttuggingcrap]You're a father. Do you remember you son when he was a first grader?[/hearttuggingcrap]


I apologize. Upon further research I find am probably wrong and I feel shitty and sorry about what I wrote.
I love you.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 36442
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: Gringolandia

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Count Machuki » 08 Dec 2016, 18:39

Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 36442
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: Gringolandia

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Count Machuki » 08 Dec 2016, 18:41

Ok, Jimbo
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
fueryIre
Posts: 8382
Joined: 04 May 2011, 02:57
Location: the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between th

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby fueryIre » 08 Dec 2016, 19:05

Jimbo wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:
Jimbo wrote:
[T]hat heart-tugging crap Sandy Hook example you have chosen to mock conspiracy theorists.


[hearttuggingcrap]You're a father. Do you remember you son when he was a first grader?[/hearttuggingcrap]


I apologize. Upon further research I find am probably wrong and I feel shitty and sorry about what I wrote.


You get visited by Bob Marley and three ghostly friends last night or something, Jimbo?
Image

User avatar
Jimbo
Posts: 13226
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 21:22

Re: The Jimbo thread - conspiracies gratefully accepted

Postby Jimbo » 08 Dec 2016, 19:34

No, I just get wrapped up in this bullshit and while it is intriguing sometimes I end up hurting friends' feelings (Sorry again, Count) and i will endeavor - again - to control my impulses.
I love you.


Return to “Nextdoorland”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Six String and 3 guests