
Chris Finch, yesterday.
It was Chris Pincher!

Which is funnier if anything: Chris 'arse' Pincher.
Deebank wrote:
Does anyone care what Blair does or says any more?
Deebank wrote:It was Chris Pincher!![]()
Which is funnier if anything: Chris 'arse' Pincher.
The Prof wrote:Deebank wrote:It was Chris Pincher!![]()
Which is funnier if anything: Chris 'arse' Pincher.
According to the BBC, the Whips office have launched a formal probe.
Some of these names and phrases just write themselves.
The Prof wrote:Do we need to comment on Yomps' verbal diarrhoea above?
I can't be bothered
yomptepi wrote:The Prof wrote:Do we need to comment on Yomps' verbal diarrhoea above?
I can't be bothered
You do not, because you don't mind. In fact you approve because you voted for him three times. Which makes you complicit in his crimes.
Diamond Dog wrote:yomptepi wrote:The Prof wrote:Do we need to comment on Yomps' verbal diarrhoea above?
I can't be bothered
You do not, because you don't mind. In fact you approve because you voted for him three times. Which makes you complicit in his crimes.
That's considerably less than you've voted for Heath/Thatcher/Major/Cameron/May/Johnson et al, so 'people in glass houses' and all that.
The Prof wrote:Do we need to comment on Yomps' verbal diarrhoea above?
I can't be bothered
yomptepi wrote:Diamond Dog wrote:yomptepi wrote:
You do not, because you don't mind. In fact you approve because you voted for him three times. Which makes you complicit in his crimes.
That's considerably less than you've voted for Heath/Thatcher/Major/Cameron/May/Johnson et al, so 'people in glass houses' and all that.
Simply not true, and you know it. A vote for Blair was a vote for war and mass slaughter, yet people still think it is OK. You worry about our grubby Pm and his dirty ways and his incompetence. But compared to Blair is a bumbling ameteur. I doubt he has managed to secure five bob from incompetant machination. Blair made himself and his henchmen multi millionaires on the misery of millions and you support him.
yomptepi wrote:Deebank wrote:
Does anyone care what Blair does or says any more?
I care that still gets a clean pass even after all these years, when it has been proven over and over again that his was the least competant, most corrupt, and led the most economically catastrophic government this country has ever had. His list of disastrous policies just goes on and on, as does the list of his lies and deceits. And yet the witless drones here still hold him up as some sort of god. It is very frustrating.
Deebank wrote:yomptepi wrote:Diamond Dog wrote:
That's considerably less than you've voted for Heath/Thatcher/Major/Cameron/May/Johnson et al, so 'people in glass houses' and all that.
Simply not true, and you know it. A vote for Blair was a vote for war and mass slaughter, yet people still think it is OK. You worry about our grubby Pm and his dirty ways and his incompetence. But compared to Blair is a bumbling ameteur. I doubt he has managed to secure five bob from incompetant machination. Blair made himself and his henchmen multi millionaires on the misery of millions and you support him.
Utter cobblers.
Why do idiots like you always give Johnson the benefit of the doubt while he gleefully shits on you from a great height again and again and again?
It is beyond me
yomptepi wrote:Deebank wrote:yomptepi wrote:
Simply not true, and you know it. A vote for Blair was a vote for war and mass slaughter, yet people still think it is OK. You worry about our grubby Pm and his dirty ways and his incompetence. But compared to Blair is a bumbling ameteur. I doubt he has managed to secure five bob from incompetant machination. Blair made himself and his henchmen multi millionaires on the misery of millions and you support him.
Utter cobblers.
Why do idiots like you always give Johnson the benefit of the doubt while he gleefully shits on you from a great height again and again and again?
It is beyond me
I do not give him the benefit of anything. But compared to Blair he is a paragon of virtue.Of course, as you are complicit in his War Crimes, I would never expect you to see that.
yomptepi wrote:The Prof wrote:Do we need to comment on Yomps' verbal diarrhoea above?
I can't be bothered
You do not, because you don't mind. In fact you approve because you voted for him three times. Which makes you complicit in his crimes.
yomptepi wrote:slightbreeze wrote:When Starmer was elected as Labour leader, I was elated ....on paper at least. However, appearances and CV's can be deceptive. A leader needs a personality, a presence, no matter how shallow this may sound, and Starmer is as dull as ditchwater.
He could do with a fucking bath.
Dr Markus wrote:
Someone in your line of work usually as their own man cave aka the shed we're they can potter around fixing stuff or something don't they?
Flower wrote:I just did a google search.
Minnie Cheddars wrote:yomptepi wrote:slightbreeze wrote:When Starmer was elected as Labour leader, I was elated ....on paper at least. However, appearances and CV's can be deceptive. A leader needs a personality, a presence, no matter how shallow this may sound, and Starmer is as dull as ditchwater.
He could do with a fucking bath.
what ARE you on about??
Minnie Cheddars wrote:what ARE you on about??
The Prof wrote:Minnie Cheddars wrote:what ARE you on about??
He has "funny" names for Labour leaders. "Magic Grandad", "Brain Dead Ed" "Unhygienic Millionaire" you get the idea.
Of course the disgusting sleazy, moral-vaccuum of lawbreaking freaks & ghouls that currently run the country get a free pass. Funny that.
The Prof wrote:I’m sure those that support this disgrace of a government will applaud your efforts to redress the balance with your rapier like wit.