Return of the RECENT VIEWING

..and why not?
User avatar
Jeemo
Posts: 21021
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 23:17
Location: ????

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Jeemo » 07 Aug 2019, 23:15

Lord Rother wrote:
Jeemo wrote:Wee guy wanted to see Yesterday, yesterday. Can honestly say it's one of the worst films I have ever seen. It also has a jaw droppingly awful scene. Dont waste your money trust me.


Nonsense.

It’s delightful.

And it’s got Lily James.

(And Ed Sheeran.)

If you don’t like Richard Curtis, don’t go. If you do, you’ll love it.

I sense BCB movie watchers are probably a long way up they own arses so I may very well be alone, which is fine.


Where to start. As I said if wasnt my choice, The Wee guy wanted to see it, so I took him. However, I have enough critical facilities about me to judge a film on its merits, even if it's not particularly my taste.

Do I love movies? Yes. Do I like a lot of movies that are regarded as classics or artistic? Yes. Does that mean I'm "a long way up my own arse" no it doesn't.

The film doesn't even follow it's own internal logic. The main character can remember The Beatles but all his albums have ceased to exist. The Beatles were never sucessful. Yet, later in the film two other characters turn up that know the Beatles, and one of them is waving a Yellow Submarine. Why didnt this disappear along with the afore mentioned albums.

As for the appearance of a certain person, delightful? Christ, man its one of the most hackneyed moments in cinema history.

Every character was a cardboard cliche. And then there was the charisma vacuum of Ed Sheeran.

Yes it's a fantasy, but that's no excuse for this car crash. It's a Wonderful Life is also a fantasy and is perfection. I saw Hobbs and Shaw at the weekend with the Wee Guy. Also a fantasy, gloriously over the top entertainment.
You liked Yesterday, good for you. It's just your opinion, my opinion is that it was complete and utter shite.

I sense your opinions on film are just like your opinions on music. Totally out of step with mine. Which is fine.
Image So Long Kid, Take A Bow.

User avatar
Lord Rother
Posts: 6785
Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 11:54
Location: breaking the legs of the bastard that got me framed

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Lord Rother » 08 Aug 2019, 07:09

Oh God Yes, the plot was a real back of a fag packet job, but I can’t hide the fact that I was thoroughly entertained and came out with a feel-good glow from watching it.

Sometimes you want to be challenged, scared, exhausted from laughing, intrigued, in awe..... for sure Yesterday did none of those. But it didn’t need to (for me).

I’m an intelligent enough guy though not at all intellectual and maybe that’s an advantage when it comes to watching / reading / listening. I just engage with the level something is pitched at and rarely analyse it too deeply. Maybe that’s a bit shallow but it works for me.

User avatar
Jeemo
Posts: 21021
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 23:17
Location: ????

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Jeemo » 08 Aug 2019, 09:10

I agree that meeting something at the level that it is pitched at, is how to generally approach stuff. I just thought that Yesterday failed on that basis badly.

Anyway, must get back to my box set of Eisenstien black and white silent classics.
Image So Long Kid, Take A Bow.

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53383
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Snarfyguy » 15 Aug 2019, 18:33

Image

Pretty forgettable black comedy/thriller kinda thing. Starts out okay but becomes predictable and rote promptly.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53383
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Snarfyguy » 11 Sep 2019, 22:04

Image

This was enjoyable, but vaguely annoying in its own hyper-competence (it's Aaron Sorkin helming, don't ya know).

Image

French zombie film about how to live when you're (presumably) the last non-zombie in the world. Really good, I thought.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.

User avatar
Darkness_Fish
Posts: 7046
Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Darkness_Fish » 14 Sep 2019, 16:19

Snarfyguy wrote:Image

French zombie film about how to live when you're (presumably) the last non-zombie in the world. Really good, I thought.

Yeah, I liked that one a lot. I think it's the definitive film in the zombie & experimental percussion genre.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.

User avatar
Livet
'progressively malty'
Posts: 3189
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:19
Location: The Glen

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Livet » 18 Sep 2019, 15:20

Image

I really loved this Jarmusch film. Sophisticated vampires and a great soundtrack!
The crazy music drives you insane

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53383
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: Return of the RECENT VIEWING

Postby Snarfyguy » 18 Sep 2019, 19:45

^^^ Thanks for reminder that I really want to see that. I've placed it on my Netflix queue.

Meanwhile,

Image

Us, d. Jordan Peele, U.S. 2019

I thought this was excellent. Most movies with this premise are just rote and predictable, but this was very original, compelling, exciting and spooky.

Also,

Image

M, d. Fritz Lang, Germany 1931

Found the Criterion double DVD at a flea market for two bucks, so what the heck. As great as ever, and I wept at Peter Lorre's oration in the climax of the film. Just... the humanity of it. What a performance!

There's a hilarious sequence where the various guilds and syndicates gather and carp about how the murders are putting a crimp in their operations and it's a SMOKE-FEST. Like, virtually every person is smoking and you can almost hardly even see their faces.

Image

I wonder what Lang scholars make of it.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.