"Smartest Sci Film In Years"

..and why not?
User avatar
Dr Markus
Posts: 17670
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 18:16

"Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Dr Markus » 09 Nov 2016, 17:30

Nolan might feel he has competition, only he'll feel that though.

It’s a long time since a commercial science-fiction movie has addressed itself so directly to big ideas. We should be glad for Arrival


http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20161108-arrival-is-the-smartest-big-budget-sci-fi-film-in-years
Drama Queenie wrote:You are a chauvinist of the quaintest kind. About as threatening as Jack Duckworth, you are a harmless relic of that cherished era when things were 'different'. Now get back to drawing a moustache on that page three model

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 14077
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Sneelock » 09 Nov 2016, 18:31

I'm looking forward to this one. I love me a sci/fi movie and I think I'm pretty impressed with Amy Adams. I saw "Big Eyes" a couple of weeks ago and I thought she was just terrific in that.
uggy poopy doody.

User avatar
Jimbly
Posts: 21959
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 23:17
Location: ????

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Jimbly » 09 Nov 2016, 23:14

Christ, The big brain Nolan myth again.
So Long Kid, Take A Bow.

User avatar
Moleskin
Posts: 14607
Joined: 18 Feb 2004, 12:38
Location: We began to notice that we could be free, And we moved together to the West.

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Moleskin » 12 Nov 2016, 18:18

I'm looking forward to this.
@hewsim
-the artist formerly known as comrade moleskin-
-the unforgettable waldo jeffers-

Jug Band Music
my own music

User avatar
Hen Abye Tokensthwaite
Posts: 138
Joined: 15 May 2015, 00:20

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Hen Abye Tokensthwaite » 28 Nov 2016, 13:13

I know nothing about this, but 'Moon' (2009) ought to be the benchmark.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 7316
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby jimboo » 14 Aug 2017, 18:46

I liked it , anyone a fan ?
If I jerk- the handle jerk- the handle you'll thrill me and thrill me

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32974
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Goat Boy » 14 Aug 2017, 19:06

Yes, it's very good.

Sam Rockwell should be a big star
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism

User avatar
Snarfyguy
Dominated by the Obscure
Posts: 53502
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
Location: New York

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Snarfyguy » 14 Aug 2017, 19:07

Goat Boy wrote:Yes, it's very good.

Sam Rockwell should be a big star

I'm kind of glad he's not, if you know what I mean.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.

User avatar
Penk!
Midnight to Six Man
Posts: 35784
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
Location: Stockholm

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Penk! » 14 Aug 2017, 20:00

jimboo wrote:I liked it , anyone a fan ?


Arrival or Moon?

Moon was very good if a bit slight. Arrival was OK.
fange wrote:One of the things i really dislike in this life is people raising their voices in German.

User avatar
Penk!
Midnight to Six Man
Posts: 35784
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:12
Location: Stockholm

Re: "Smartest Sci Film In Years"

Postby Penk! » 14 Aug 2017, 20:01

Copy-pasted from my own post in the "recent viewing" thread a few months ago:

Aliens arrive (get it?) on earth in twelve giant Chocolate Orange slices, and Amy Adams and Jeremy Renner are tasked with trying to communicate with the slice that is in Montana. Well, Amy Adams tries to communicate with them and Jeremy Renner just kind of hangs around and helps her a bit (he's supposedly a physics boffin but doesn't do any actual physics or anything).
There's a very good film about communication and language in here somewhere, but it's muddled by a silly (and slightly politically dodgy) subplot in which the Chinese and Russians (of course it's them!) take a more aggressive approach to their slices, the by-now clichéd and token emotional background (giving characters dead children seems a way of skipping over actually fleshing them out) and a too-obvious twist. The acting is solid and the suspense is good, and the passages where the first breakthroughs are made are compelling, but the audience is never as awed as the characters at the immensity of the experience: the film arrives but then never takes off, and ends up dawdling limply over the finish line.
It's been very highly praised but I think it's another case of the paucity of comparable material getting critics overexcited about some Hollywood sci-fi that does have a bit of intelligence.
fange wrote:One of the things i really dislike in this life is people raising their voices in German.


Return to “Screenadelica”