the cockney kids are innocent

Do talk back
Bungo the Mungo

the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 20:26

tell us the truth.

a lesson to be learned.

[youtube]6utdlMvuD74&hl[/youtube]

The Modernist

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby The Modernist » 16 Jan 2009, 20:35

What is it with you and Jimmy A?

(I'm in a good mood tonight btw I bought a brushed suede jacket with double flap pockets which is always a beautiful touch).

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 20:39

Dr Modernist wrote:I'm in a good mood tonight btw


i'm pleased to hear that, G.

put some sham on and chill.

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 20:54

for the kids

[youtube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/doCrdhbPcmw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/doCrdhbPcmw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 21:02

i'll always say what i want to say

[youtube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooS5kRDUfGQ&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooS5kRDUfGQ&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 21:24

we're alright. that's alright guvner. jack the lad. know what i mean?

[youtube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bzHFXzum95w&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bzHFXzum95w&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

User avatar
yomptepi
BCB thumbscrew of Justice
Posts: 35662
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 17:57
Location: well

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby yomptepi » 16 Jan 2009, 21:45

1978 was a lot like 1968, wasn't it??

More of the same but not as good. sham were rubbish. Jimmy Pursey was craven wannabe with no musical abilty , and a habit of assembling lyrics from the Sun. There were no great punk records made after 1976, and none released after 1977. You , of all people should know that Adam. Altho your occassional lapses into Mod revivalisn have got you into trouble before...
You don't like me...do you?

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 21:50

yomptepi wrote: sham were rubbish.


you are the fanfare of the common BCB.

not a clue, mikel.

User avatar
yomptepi
BCB thumbscrew of Justice
Posts: 35662
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 17:57
Location: well

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby yomptepi » 16 Jan 2009, 21:56

I didn't say I did not like them. I think Tell us the truth is a moronic masterpiece. Like a very bad eastenders set to some poorly written punk lite music. It has a desperate energy to it, and the one thing Pursey could do well was desperate. His lyrics often sounded like he had written them after listening to a phone in program on LBC, or watching low brow documentaries on ITV. He really was a wretchedly untalented man.
You don't like me...do you?

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 22:08

yomptepi wrote:I didn't say I did not like them. I think Tell us the truth is a moronic masterpiece. Like a very bad eastenders set to some poorly written punk lite music. It has a desperate energy to it, and the one thing Pursey could do well was desperate. His lyrics often sounded like he had written them after listening to a phone in program on LBC, or watching low brow documentaries on ITV. He really was a wretchedly untalented man.


i think you have hit the nail on the head.

let's not bring BCB to it's knees with pious virtues.

The Modernist

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby The Modernist » 16 Jan 2009, 22:14

yomptepi wrote:There were no great punk records made after 1976,


You're most outlandish statement ever! :D

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 22:18

Dr Modernist wrote:
yomptepi wrote:There were no great punk records made after 1976,


You're most outlandish statement ever! :D


and yet one could argue 1967.

think on, G.

User avatar
RcL
Posts: 8942
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 02:39

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby RcL » 16 Jan 2009, 22:28

Dr Modernist wrote:
yomptepi wrote:There were no great punk records made after 1976,


You're most outlandish statement ever! :D


Clearly the erstwhile Mr Ikon has not yet heard Complete Control! ;)

User avatar
yomptepi
BCB thumbscrew of Justice
Posts: 35662
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 17:57
Location: well

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby yomptepi » 16 Jan 2009, 22:37

Jimmy Jazz wrote:
yomptepi wrote:1978 was a lot like 1968, wasn't it??

More of the same but not as good. sham were rubbish. Jimmy Pursey was craven wannabe with no musical abilty , and a habit of assembling lyrics from the Sun. There were no great punk records made after 1976, and none released after 1977. You , of all people should know that Adam. Altho your occassional lapses into Mod revivalisn have got you into trouble before...


Jeez, 30 years on and you still don't get it. I pray for you Mike.


Good to se you back JJ.

And remember , I don't have to get it..I invented it.
You don't like me...do you?

purgatory brite

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby purgatory brite » 16 Jan 2009, 23:00

FFS Solarskope from third-rate Small Faces copyists to the abominable Sham 69, your musical judgement is going down hill by the week.

We'll have to suffer the Cockney Rejects next. West Ham fans have to stick together I suppose.

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 23:03

Purgatory Brite wrote:FFS Solarskope from third-rate Small Faces copyists to the abominable Sham 69, your musical judgement is going down hill by the week.

We'll have to suffer the Cockney Rejects next. West Ham fans have to stick together I suppose.


carlsson will be proud.

well done.

purgatory brite

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby purgatory brite » 16 Jan 2009, 23:24

A thought occurs to me, if Sham 69 come from Surrey they simply can't be Cockneys.

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 23:25

Purgatory Brite wrote:A thought occurs to me


incredible.

purgatory brite

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby purgatory brite » 16 Jan 2009, 23:30

solarskope wrote:
Purgatory Brite wrote:A thought occurs to me


incredible.


sarcasm is the lowest form of humour

Bungo the Mungo

Re: the cockney kids are innocent

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 16 Jan 2009, 23:33

Purgatory Brite wrote:
solarskope wrote:
Purgatory Brite wrote:A thought occurs to me


incredible.


sarcasm is the lowest form of humour


shoo, fly.