Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Do talk back

Who's better?

Poll ended at 02 Feb 2007, 23:04

David Bowie
34
67%
Lou Reed
17
33%
 
Total votes: 51

User avatar
Guy E
Posts: 13301
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:11
Location: Antalya, Turkey

Postby Guy E » 08 Dec 2006, 23:25

It really was dire and the stench was so poisonous that it's only been in the last few years that I could go back and enjoy groups like the Dead, Allmans and Skynyrd without wanting to crawl out of my skin. I can't say that I actively hate somebody like the New Riders of the Purple Sage, but there weren't too many options in those neo-Norman Rockwell times.

There were other negative ingredients; AM radio had pretty much died after CCR's bi-monthly subscription of hit records came to an end and FM Radio had its own strict set of rules (at least where I lived). Luckily, Al Green and Stevie Wonder were making great records and like you say Jeff, the funk stuff was good on the ears by the mid-70's... that stuff saved the radio. I was lucky in that I went to a big University in 1972 and got to see good people in clubs and in on-campus recital halls and chapels, so that was a blessing. The big Assembly Hall shows during those years were the Dead, ELP, Joni Mitchell, Beach Boys, Paul Simon, Stevie Wonder, J. Geils... not a terrible cross-section, but...

User avatar
Jeff K
The Original K
Posts: 32699
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:08
Location: Pennsylvania USA
Contact:

Postby Jeff K » 08 Dec 2006, 23:29

A question posed to Guy...

Do you think you'd be as interested in music as you are now had your batteries not been re-charged by punk?

I probably wouldn't be.
the science eel experiment wrote:Jesus Christ can't save BCB, i believe i can.

Phil T

Postby Phil T » 08 Dec 2006, 23:31

Guy E wrote:The arrival of the punk era, no matter how you define it, was a life-saver.


Amen.

User avatar
king feeb
He's the consultant of swing
Posts: 26243
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 00:42
Location: Soon Over Babaluma
Contact:

Postby king feeb » 09 Dec 2006, 02:53

I have to concur with Guye and Jeff. The American rock music scene in the mid-seventies was a wasteland. It was also quite polarized- you had your hard rawk or your grunchy granola folkie songwriter types. Anyone who didn't fit the mold fell through the cracks (ala Big Star). In those years, I listened almost exclusively to British or German rock bands, with the odd American artist oozing in occasionally (Blue Oyster Cult, The Dolls, The Dictators, Lou). Like Guye, I started buying a lot of jazz at that time.

I definitely wouldn't be as interested in music if not for the advent of punk, and I doubt I'd still be playing it if I hadn't internalized punk's never-say-die stubborn attitude.
You'd pay big bucks to know what you really think.

User avatar
Jeff K
The Original K
Posts: 32699
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:08
Location: Pennsylvania USA
Contact:

Postby Jeff K » 09 Dec 2006, 03:14

I think the last few posts are proof that punk did matter to some of us and wasn't just a trend that we jumped on. I get irritated when someone younger than me says it was just a fad and the music had no real substance. As Guy said, it was a life-altering experience.
the science eel experiment wrote:Jesus Christ can't save BCB, i believe i can.

Sneelock

Postby Sneelock » 09 Dec 2006, 03:19

the main thing I liked about punk was that it blindsided a lot of people. now, it's true that it wasn't the cash cow many thought it would be but the fact remains, people who thought they knew it all, didn't know SHIT.
that really needed to happen right about then as far as I was concerned.

who knows how many Laurel Canyon plumbers David Geffen would have poured into denim pants if not for being blindsided by punk. it made some very settled people lose their balance. yay.

User avatar
Jeff K
The Original K
Posts: 32699
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:08
Location: Pennsylvania USA
Contact:

Postby Jeff K » 09 Dec 2006, 03:20

goldwax wrote:
Jeff K wrote:I think the last few posts are proof that punk did matter to some of us and wasn't just a trend that we jumped on. I get irritated when someone younger than me says it was just a fad and the music had no real substance. As Guy said, it was a life-altering experience.


Yeah, but look at your life. :wink:


Go back to your 'inspired amateurism', you record company lapdog you :x
the science eel experiment wrote:Jesus Christ can't save BCB, i believe i can.

User avatar
king feeb
He's the consultant of swing
Posts: 26243
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 00:42
Location: Soon Over Babaluma
Contact:

Postby king feeb » 09 Dec 2006, 03:20

It's a Wonderful Giraffe wrote:
good king feebeslas wrote: Like Guye, I started buying a lot of jazz at that time.


it's always a damning indictment of any music scene when the kids start listening to coltrane and mingus. :(


*hides Kenny G albums*
You'd pay big bucks to know what you really think.

User avatar
Jeff K
The Original K
Posts: 32699
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:08
Location: Pennsylvania USA
Contact:

Postby Jeff K » 09 Dec 2006, 03:25

good king feebeslas wrote:
It's a Wonderful Giraffe wrote:
good king feebeslas wrote: Like Guye, I started buying a lot of jazz at that time.


it's always a damning indictment of any music scene when the kids start listening to coltrane and mingus. :(


*hides Kenny G albums*


Come on, feeb. Kenny G wasn't even around during the 70's.

Here's who you were really hiding....

Image
the science eel experiment wrote:Jesus Christ can't save BCB, i believe i can.

Sneelock

Postby Sneelock » 09 Dec 2006, 03:29

Jeff K wrote:I think the last few posts are proof that punk did matter to some of us and wasn't just a trend that we jumped on. I get irritated when someone younger than me says it was just a fad and the music had no real substance. As Guy said, it was a life-altering experience.


the great equalizer is that the same thing will happen to them soon enough. I saw the hippy thing close enough to feel a similar frustration when bellicose young Republicans want to tell me how hippies lost the war in Viet Nam. I mean, doesn't that opinion seem deranged to anybody who actually lived in those times? well, it's an opinion I hear from young people a LOT.

It was weird when the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame started inducting some 'punk and new wave' bands how offended so many people were by it. maybe those bands made us lose a war or something and I missed it.

User avatar
king feeb
He's the consultant of swing
Posts: 26243
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 00:42
Location: Soon Over Babaluma
Contact:

Postby king feeb » 09 Dec 2006, 03:55

Jeff K wrote:
good king feebeslas wrote:
It's a Wonderful Giraffe wrote:
good king feebeslas wrote: Like Guye, I started buying a lot of jazz at that time.


it's always a damning indictment of any music scene when the kids start listening to coltrane and mingus. :(


*hides Kenny G albums*


Come on, feeb. Kenny G wasn't even around during the 70's.

Here's who you were really hiding....

Image


No man. Really. It was Kenny G. Back before he started to suck.

Image
You'd pay big bucks to know what you really think.

The Modernist

Re: Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Postby The Modernist » 20 Jul 2009, 10:40

Well this was a lively read! :)

Bungo the Mungo

Re:

Postby Bungo the Mungo » 20 Jul 2009, 12:39

yomptepi wrote:Lodger is shit

I am however, a little bemused by the assertion that Aladin Sane is weak...


What has man got to do?????


I have since reassessed Aladdin Sane and now think it's a very good album.

Lodger still sounds like Eno-ish 'funk' - nasty.

User avatar
Insouciant Western People
Posts: 24653
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 13:31
Location: The pit of propaganda

Re: Re:

Postby Insouciant Western People » 20 Jul 2009, 12:59

Don Vine wrote:I have since reassessed Aladdin Sane and now think it's a very good album.


Mm, I think it's probably my favourite non-Berlin Bowie lp. With Hunky Dory and Scary Monsters close runners-up.
Jeff K wrote:Nick's still the man! No one has been as consistent as he has been over such a long period of time.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 32974
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Postby Goat Boy » 20 Jul 2009, 13:30

Lodger is fantastic. Clean your ears out for crying out loud!
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.


Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism

User avatar
Moleskin
Posts: 14607
Joined: 18 Feb 2004, 12:38
Location: We began to notice that we could be free, And we moved together to the West.

Re: Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Postby Moleskin » 20 Jul 2009, 15:12

Should have had this thread 20 years ago, when I was still listening to their records.
@hewsim
-the artist formerly known as comrade moleskin-
-the unforgettable waldo jeffers-

Jug Band Music
my own music

User avatar
Brin
Rogue element
Posts: 6826
Joined: 02 Nov 2003, 16:18
Location: ''Trying to get to heaven before they close the door''

Re: Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Postby Brin » 20 Jul 2009, 15:37

Bowie.
Beebsy wrote:The guys are wankers, we all know that.

User avatar
Jeff K
The Original K
Posts: 32699
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:08
Location: Pennsylvania USA
Contact:

Re: Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Postby Jeff K » 20 Jul 2009, 15:43

This thread was fun to read through again. I still stand by everything I wrote too.
the science eel experiment wrote:Jesus Christ can't save BCB, i believe i can.

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 32527
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Postby Matt Wilson » 20 Jul 2009, 15:54

Gee, Jeff. We didn't know that...
Image
Last edited by Matt Wilson on 20 Jul 2009, 19:44, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
der nister
Posts: 15564
Joined: 30 Sep 2008, 18:42

Re: Lou Reed vs. David Bowie

Postby der nister » 20 Jul 2009, 16:06

Gorts, I think we need to close this thread.

Oops wrong forum :lol:
It's kinda depressing for a music forum to be proud of not knowing musicians.


Return to “Yakety Yak”