Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Do talk back
User avatar
GoogaMooga
custodian of oldies
Posts: 26244
Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
Location: Denmark

Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby GoogaMooga » 11 Jan 2020, 23:44

What is it about mono? Aside from that whole Wall of Sound aesthetic/fetish, mono just seems more correct, less manipulated. I like the density of it. No separation. All of the sounds coming out of both speakers. Or just having one speaker, and having a good time with that. Mono is solid, stereo is reedy.
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 30158
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby Matt Wilson » 12 Jan 2020, 01:38

Love me some mono. I prefer it actually, when listening to most music before 1968. After that, true mono mixes become more rare. By 1969 there are hardly any dedicated mono mixes to be found.

It's easier to tell you the mono mixes I don't prefer to be honest. The Doors and Strange Days are better in stereo. I haven't heard all of Are You Experienced in mono, but Axis Bold as Love sounds better in stereo. The second Country Joe & The Fish LP is better in stereo, and probably the Byrds' Notorious Byrd Bros and Cream's Disraeli Gears are better in stereo. Likewise, the White Album.

Can't think of too many more, really.

User avatar
Still Baron
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 43758
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby Still Baron » 12 Jan 2020, 19:19

I am not convinced that either has any inherent properties that make one inherently preferable over the other. It depends.
Quaco wrote:Are you fucking high?

take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
The Slider
Self-Aggrandising Cock
Posts: 46937
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:05
Location: I'm only here for the sneer
Contact:

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby The Slider » 12 Jan 2020, 19:28

I always prefer a good stereo mix to a good mono one (Pepper)

But I prefer a good mono mix to a bad stereo one (Piper)
The Complete Kinks Mp3 set now available in the usual place, should you want one.
Image

User avatar
GoogaMooga
custodian of oldies
Posts: 26244
Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
Location: Denmark

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby GoogaMooga » 12 Jan 2020, 21:44

I've got The White Album in mono, and that's the way of my Beatles up to 1968. Telling that the mono box was ltd ed, while the stereo is readily available. Mono seems to be for connoisseurs and dare I say it, anoraks.
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck

User avatar
GoogaMooga
custodian of oldies
Posts: 26244
Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
Location: Denmark

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby GoogaMooga » 12 Jan 2020, 21:46

Sometimes I wish stereo was never invented. I have never listened to quad, though, but imagine it is not very good. My Santana "Lotus" was quad vinyl, but it played okay on my stereo. Don't recall if it sounded "funny".
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck

User avatar
trans-chigley express
Posts: 18351
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 01:50
Location: Asia's WC

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby trans-chigley express » 13 Jan 2020, 04:19

GoogaMooga wrote:I've got The White Album in mono, and that's the way of my Beatles up to 1968. Telling that the mono box was ltd ed, while the stereo is readily available. Mono seems to be for connoisseurs and dare I say it, anoraks.


I don't think the mono box was ever really a limited edition, they kept making them for as long as people were buying them. You can still get them now.

User avatar
trans-chigley express
Posts: 18351
Joined: 11 Nov 2003, 01:50
Location: Asia's WC

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby trans-chigley express » 13 Jan 2020, 04:22

GoogaMooga wrote:Sometimes I wish stereo was never invented. I have never listened to quad, though, but imagine it is not very good. My Santana "Lotus" was quad vinyl, but it played okay on my stereo. Don't recall if it sounded "funny".


I had a Quad LP of Tubular Bells and even though I only ever played it in stereo it did sound a bit "funny". It also had an added section with a model aeroplane that was meant to sound like it was flying around you if played in quad but just seemed to go from speaker to speaker in stereo.

User avatar
GoogaMooga
custodian of oldies
Posts: 26244
Joined: 28 Sep 2010, 05:23
Location: Denmark

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby GoogaMooga » 13 Jan 2020, 08:00

trans-chigley express wrote:
GoogaMooga wrote:I've got The White Album in mono, and that's the way of my Beatles up to 1968. Telling that the mono box was ltd ed, while the stereo is readily available. Mono seems to be for connoisseurs and dare I say it, anoraks.


I don't think the mono box was ever really a limited edition, they kept making them for as long as people were buying them. You can still get them now.



IIRC, it was announced as being ltd ed, albeit in large quantities. Isn't it OOP, prices skyrocketed?
"When the desert comes, people will be sad; just as Cannery Row was sad when all the pilchards were caught and canned and eaten." - John Steinbeck

User avatar
The Slider
Self-Aggrandising Cock
Posts: 46937
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:05
Location: I'm only here for the sneer
Contact:

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby The Slider » 13 Jan 2020, 08:18

The mono Don't Pass Me By is lots faster so it is over quicker
For that, the mono White Album has a head start

I prefer the Mono mixes up to Help, then the Stereos from Rubber Souls onwards
The Complete Kinks Mp3 set now available in the usual place, should you want one.
Image

User avatar
Quaco
F R double E
Posts: 47223
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:41

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby Quaco » 13 Jan 2020, 09:55

Stereo is great. I love crazy wide panning sometimes, or just a warm sitting-in-between-all-the-instruments feel. In general, it shouldn't be that different from mono unless called for for creative reasons.

Some things sound better in mono, for sure. The one that always comes to mind is the Stones' Their Satanic Majesties Request, which is kind of diffuse and lacking impact in stereo, but packs a drug-addled punch in mono.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

User avatar
soundchaser
Rokster & Rollster
Posts: 8729
Joined: 20 Jun 2006, 10:55

Re: Why do you like mono better than stereo?

Postby soundchaser » 13 Jan 2020, 22:48

GoogaMooga wrote:What is it about mono? Aside from that whole Wall of Sound aesthetic/fetish, mono just seems more correct, less manipulated. I like the density of it. No separation. All of the sounds coming out of both speakers. Or just having one speaker, and having a good time with that. Mono is solid, stereo is reedy.


Are you able to have a soundstage? I think well produced stereo is wondrous.