John aka Josh wrote: I might not be here next Friday - should be, but there have been significant (& ongoing) traffic delays on the journey I'll be taking. Most definitely hoping to be!
I am happy to delay the start....
JJ?
.
John aka Josh wrote: I might not be here next Friday - should be, but there have been significant (& ongoing) traffic delays on the journey I'll be taking. Most definitely hoping to be!
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
John aka Josh wrote:Lovely ending to week.
Thanks as always for the wonderful company. I might not be here next Friday - should be, but there have been significant (& ongoing) traffic delays on the journey I'll be taking. Most definitely hoping to be!
Nancy wrote:So White Ladies is a slight step down but still worthy?
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
C wrote:John aka Josh wrote: I might not be here next Friday - should be, but there have been significant (& ongoing) traffic delays on the journey I'll be taking. Most definitely hoping to be!
I am happy to delay the start....
JJ?
.
John aka Josh wrote: I might not be here next Friday - should be, but there have been significant (& ongoing) traffic delays on the journey I'll be taking. Most definitely hoping to be!
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
C wrote:John aka Josh wrote: I might not be here next Friday - should be, but there have been significant (& ongoing) traffic delays on the journey I'll be taking. Most definitely hoping to be!
I am happy to delay the start....
Sorry kath/reap?
.
kath wrote:i do believe we have both responded in agreement.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".