Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
- NMB
- Posts: 4774
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005, 20:46
- Location: Darkest Surrey
Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
I’ll let you decide what isn’t obvious. But I’ll nominate Pink Floyd (Nick Mason) and Deep Purple (Ian Paice), they’re probably not the first people you’d mention when listing who was in those bands but they’re the only ones who were always there. Who else?
turn on, tune in, nod off
- never/ever
- Posts: 26478
- Joined: 27 Jun 2008, 14:21
- Location: Journeying through a burning brain
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Larry Mullen jr
Rinus Gerritsen (Golden Earring)
Rinus Gerritsen (Golden Earring)
kath wrote:i do not wanna buy the world a fucquin gotdamn coke.
- Count Machuki
- BCB Cup Champion 2013
- Posts: 39534
- Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
- Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Drummer Bobby Caldwell of Captain Beyond
I only know because Buddha and I saw them last year and Ben said Caldwell was the only original guy. I said (jokingly), "Watch, they'll open with a damn drum solo!" We laughed.
Guess what they opened with...
edit: actually, screw it, he's not continuous, looks like he was out of the band for a few years in the mid-70s
I only know because Buddha and I saw them last year and Ben said Caldwell was the only original guy. I said (jokingly), "Watch, they'll open with a damn drum solo!" We laughed.
Guess what they opened with...
edit: actually, screw it, he's not continuous, looks like he was out of the band for a few years in the mid-70s
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D
- bobzilla77
- Posts: 16280
- Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
- Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Paice is the one that came to mind.
What about the Stones? It's Charlie, innit? He was in it with Dick Taylor, Wyman and Brian Jones before Keith, and Jagger was the last to join, right?
I remember Wyman getting testy about a plaque dedicated to the spot where "Mick and Keith formed the Stones". Wyman said it was Brian Jones that decided the name, the music they were gonna do, and picked the people to be in it.
What about the Stones? It's Charlie, innit? He was in it with Dick Taylor, Wyman and Brian Jones before Keith, and Jagger was the last to join, right?
I remember Wyman getting testy about a plaque dedicated to the spot where "Mick and Keith formed the Stones". Wyman said it was Brian Jones that decided the name, the music they were gonna do, and picked the people to be in it.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.
- Charlie O.
- Posts: 44829
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
- Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Close: Garry Peterson was with The Guess Who from 1962 (when they were known as Allan & The Silvertones) until they broke up in late 1975. A version of the band was reconstituted in 1977, Peterson re-joined them ten years later and except for a few months in 2000 has been there ever since.
This is the band's new album - see if you can guess which one he is.
This is the band's new album - see if you can guess which one he is.
- Count Machuki
- BCB Cup Champion 2013
- Posts: 39534
- Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
- Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Charlie O. wrote: see if you can guess which one he is.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D
-
- Posts: 2969
- Joined: 22 Jul 2014, 21:38
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Count Machuki wrote:
edit: actually, screw it, he's not continuous, looks like he was out of the band for a few years in the mid-70s
FUCK him!
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7792
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Charlie O. wrote:Close: Garry Peterson was with The Guess Who from 1962 (when they were known as Allan & The Silvertones) until they broke up in late 1975. A version of the band was reconstituted in 1977, Peterson re-joined them ten years later and except for a few months in 2000 has been there ever since.
This is the band's new album - see if you can guess which one he is.
That's Biffa Bacon's mutha on drums, isn't it?
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
- Rayge
- Posts: 15285
- Joined: 14 Aug 2013, 11:37
- Location: Zummerzet
- Contact:
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
It's always the drummer, isn't it?
In timeless moments we live forever
You can't play a tune on an absolute
Negative Capability...when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact & reason”
- The Slider
- Self-Aggrandising Cock
- Posts: 48255
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:05
- Location: I'm only here for the sneer
- Contact:
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
They're like cockroaches
They can even survive nuclear holocaust
They can even survive nuclear holocaust
Complete Ramones Mp3 set on its way
- Osgood
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
- Location: Madrid
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
The Slider wrote:They're like cockroaches
They can even survive nuclear holocaust
Unless they join Spinal Tap.
Nobody's ferpect.
- NMB
- Posts: 4774
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005, 20:46
- Location: Darkest Surrey
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Rayge wrote:It's always the drummer, isn't it?
Not quite. Chris Squire (bass for Yes) would have qualified until he died.
turn on, tune in, nod off
- The Modernist
- 2018 BCB Cup Champ!
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
bobzilla77 wrote:Paice is the one that came to mind.
What about the Stones? It's Charlie, innit? He was in it with Dick Taylor, Wyman and Brian Jones before Keith, and Jagger was the last to join, right?
I remember Wyman getting testy about a plaque dedicated to the spot where "Mick and Keith formed the Stones". Wyman said it was Brian Jones that decided the name, the music they were gonna do, and picked the people to be in it.
Jagger wasn't the last to join. I think it went Jones then Stewart then Jagger & Richards then Charlie then Wyman. Though it's harder to say when Watts joined because he was drumming on and off with Jones.
- Cantankerous
- Robust
- Posts: 78804
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 19:06
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Butch Trucks. Allman Brothers Band
.
.
Croan wrote:One thing about the Yanks - they never seriously piddled about in
anything as preposterously pointless as prog.
- Hightea
- Posts: 4361
- Joined: 16 Apr 2015, 02:18
- Location: NY state
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Thijs van Leer of Focus? Or do we consider its been his band all along?
Garry Tallent and Roy Bittan - E Street band
Bill Kreutzmann - another drummer
Garry Tallent and Roy Bittan - E Street band
Bill Kreutzmann - another drummer
-
- Posts: 63924
- Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Darkness_Fish wrote:Charlie O. wrote:Close: Garry Peterson was with The Guess Who from 1962 (when they were known as Allan & The Silvertones) until they broke up in late 1975. A version of the band was reconstituted in 1977, Peterson re-joined them ten years later and except for a few months in 2000 has been there ever since.
This is the band's new album - see if you can guess which one he is.
That's Biffa Bacon's mutha on drums, isn't it?
Looks more like the Guess What than the Guess Who.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!
- never/ever
- Posts: 26478
- Joined: 27 Jun 2008, 14:21
- Location: Journeying through a burning brain
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Hightea wrote:Thijs van Leer of Focus? Or do we consider its been his band all along?
Throw in Pierre van der Linden in there too. 70 and still a magnificent jaw-dropping drummer.
kath wrote:i do not wanna buy the world a fucquin gotdamn coke.
- Charlie O.
- Posts: 44829
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
- Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
never/ever wrote:Hightea wrote:Thijs van Leer of Focus? Or do we consider its been his band all along?
Throw in Pierre van der Linden in there too. 70 and still a magnificent jaw-dropping drummer.
True, but not a continuous member.
- Hightea
- Posts: 4361
- Joined: 16 Apr 2015, 02:18
- Location: NY state
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
Charlie O. wrote:never/ever wrote:Hightea wrote:Thijs van Leer of Focus? Or do we consider its been his band all along?
Throw in Pierre van der Linden in there too. 70 and still a magnificent jaw-dropping drummer.
True, but not a continuous member.
its why I didn't include him but I guess that takes Roy Bittan away too
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20248
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Bands with a not obvious only continuous member
James Purdell (The Talking Shoes)
Chester E. Herrington (Nighttalk)
Chester E. Herrington (Nighttalk)
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.