Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Do talk back

Hunter v. Lynott v. Cummings

Poll ended at 10 Feb 2020, 18:38

Ian
16
44%
Phil
14
39%
Burton
6
17%
 
Total votes: 36

User avatar
pcqgod
Posts: 19967
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 07:23
Location: Ohio

Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby pcqgod » 08 May 2018, 18:55

Evaluate and rate on any criteria you choose, but I'm mainly asking which one has the voice you like the best.
Last edited by pcqgod on 08 May 2018, 19:38, edited 1 time in total.
Where would rock 'n' roll be without feedback?

User avatar
clive gash
wannabee enfant terrible
Posts: 17219
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: down the rabbit hole

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby clive gash » 08 May 2018, 19:06

I had to look up Burton Cummings.



Looks lost without Spit the Dog :(
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.

Diamond Dog wrote:...it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce...

...a multitude of innuendo and hearsay...

...I'm producing facts here...

User avatar
Quaco
F R double E
Posts: 47383
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:41

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Quaco » 08 May 2018, 19:11

The best that Hunter wrote and delivered are the best things ever, but Lynott wrote more good songs overall and had a more fun persona.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby sloopjohnc » 08 May 2018, 19:12

Burton Cummings is a better singer than Hunter and Lynott combined. Hunter and Lynott were great songwriters whose songs and singing were very unique and rode on the strengths of their songs and personas.

I always thought Cummings was the blandest of the three, but. . .

I think the Guess Who's songs, and Cummings, were underestimated. I have a couple anthologies and am always impressed when I go back to them.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby sloopjohnc » 08 May 2018, 19:13

Quaco wrote:The best that Hunter wrote and delivered are the best things ever, but Lynott wrote more good songs overall and had a more fun persona.


And Hunter is still putting out good stuff. His Rant band is very good and there are still excellent things to find in his newer stuff.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
pcqgod
Posts: 19967
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 07:23
Location: Ohio

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby pcqgod » 08 May 2018, 19:38

Now with added poll for your convenience.
Where would rock 'n' roll be without feedback?

User avatar
Mike Boom
Posts: 4358
Joined: 02 Sep 2005, 03:49

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Mike Boom » 08 May 2018, 19:50

Image

Best album ever to get drunk with/to ...

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby sloopjohnc » 08 May 2018, 21:19

I voted Phil very much as Quaco elucidated.

His one solo album, Solo in Soho, is not bad either.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
Tom Waits For No One
Posts: 6737
Joined: 14 Nov 2014, 08:05

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Tom Waits For No One » 08 May 2018, 21:25

sloopjohnc wrote:I voted Phil very much as Quaco elucidated.

His one solo album, Solo in Soho, is not bad either.


as well as his second solo album

Image
Give a shit or be a shit.

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby sloopjohnc » 08 May 2018, 21:27

Tom Waits For No One wrote:
sloopjohnc wrote:I voted Phil very much as Quaco elucidated.

His one solo album, Solo in Soho, is not bad either.


as well as his second solo album

Image


I didn't know he had one. I knew he played in a band with Steve Jones and Paul Cook, but I've never seen this.

But then I tune out John Banks when he goes on too long about Lynott. When I can understand him.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 08 May 2018, 21:28

Hunter in almost every respect.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
naughty boy
hounds people off the board
Posts: 20266
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby naughty boy » 08 May 2018, 21:28

Lynott was aggressive and not very bright. And his music was all turds.

It's obviously Hunter, for about 8 really really great fun rock songs.
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.

User avatar
harvey k-tel
Long Player
Posts: 40893
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:20
Location: 1220 on your AM dial

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby harvey k-tel » 08 May 2018, 21:30

Oooh baby...Image
Tempora mutatur et nos mutamur in illis

User avatar
pcqgod
Posts: 19967
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 07:23
Location: Ohio

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby pcqgod » 08 May 2018, 21:30

sloopjohnc wrote:Burton Cummings is a better singer than Hunter and Lynott combined. Hunter and Lynott were great songwriters whose songs and singing were very unique and rode on the strengths of their songs and personas.

I always thought Cummings was the blandest of the three, but. . .

I think the Guess Who's songs, and Cummings, were underestimated. I have a couple anthologies and am always impressed when I go back to them.



I agree with all of that.
Where would rock 'n' roll be without feedback?

User avatar
toomanyhatz
Power-mad king of the WCC
Posts: 29993
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby toomanyhatz » 08 May 2018, 21:32

Best singer? Cummings.
Best songwriter? Lynott.
Most enduring artistically? Hunter.

So, a tossup, basically. I have the most Hunter of any of the three, but something always feels a bit lacking (on the average stuff only, the great stuff is truly great but to me there's not much of it).
Footy wrote:
The Who / Jimi Hendrix Experience Saville Theatre, London Jan '67
. Got Jimi's autograph after the show and went on to see him several times that year


1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020!! 2023?

User avatar
Charlie O.
Posts: 44882
Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Charlie O. » 08 May 2018, 22:03

Hunter - I adore the best MTH records and like most of the rest. Unlike seemingly everyone else, I haven't cared for most of his solo work. At all. Seems like a great guy.

Lynott - I was never a fan, or even wanted to be.

Cummings - I adore the best GW records and like most of the rest a lot. Just like seemingly everyone else, I haven't cared for any of his solo work. At all. And while he was once the the best singer of these three, he's appallingly bad now; I think I'd rather hear Phil Lynott's skeleton rattle its bones than Burton Cummings sing (or maybe even talk) nowadays. He can be a real prick sometimes, too.

And I'm voting for Burt anyway, just on the basis of most of what he did between 1966 and 1975. As Sloop suggests, The Guess Who, for all their hit singles, were and are underestimated as hell.
Image

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby sloopjohnc » 08 May 2018, 22:09

Charlie O. wrote:And while he was once the the best singer of these three, he's appallingly bad now


I pulled up a YouTube clip of him doing These Eyes in 2011 and he sounded great. i pulled up some singing clips in 2018 and he is terrible

What the heck happened?
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
Quaco
F R double E
Posts: 47383
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:41

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Quaco » 08 May 2018, 23:10

Hodgson's Tears wrote:Lynott was aggressive and not very bright.

Not true, not true at all. But I will admit he seems that way because of the denim, rock style, and so on. Some day, you may find yourself surprised!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

User avatar
Quaco
F R double E
Posts: 47383
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:41

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Quaco » 08 May 2018, 23:12

Charlie O. wrote:Hunter - I adore the best MTH records and like most of the rest. Unlike seemingly everyone else, I haven't cared for most of his solo work. At all. Seems like a great guy.

I'm still getting around to it all, but as far as I can tell, the first solo album is the only one that is very good.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 14077
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: Ian Hunter v. Phil Lynott v. Burton Cummings

Postby Sneelock » 08 May 2018, 23:14

that's about right but that's good enough for me.
I think he's like Lou Reed - he doesn't really sing so much as slather his songs with his personality.
when he's got the songs - this is pretty great.
uggy poopy doody.


Return to “Yakety Yak”