Beatles

Do talk back

?

yes
13
65%
no
7
35%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
The Modernist
Posts: 10445
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Beatles

Postby The Modernist » 07 Feb 2018, 22:39

jimboo wrote:Now you're just beginning to sound like a nut.


Sorry, was I meant to take "But for thrills , chills and truly 'fuck me' moments,they are surpassed over and over again." as some kind of incontrovertible fact?

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 22:41

So ,let me get this right. You don't?
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
soundchaser
Rokster & Rollster
Posts: 7734
Joined: 20 Jun 2006, 10:55

Re: Beatles

Postby soundchaser » 07 Feb 2018, 22:46

Where would British psychedelia and our own Summer of Love have been without The Beatles, I wonder?

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 22:54

Quite happily doing it's own thing I would imagine. Take the drugs away of course.....
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
soundchaser
Rokster & Rollster
Posts: 7734
Joined: 20 Jun 2006, 10:55

Re: Beatles

Postby soundchaser » 07 Feb 2018, 23:08

jimboo wrote:Quite happily doing it's own thing I would imagine. Take the drugs away of course.....



I’m not sure Pink Floyd would even have got as far as the Abbey Road front door.

So that’s the joint most influential British psychedelia album gone.

And no See Emily Play: no games for May.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 23:12

Emily was released before pepper though , wasn't it?
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
toomanyhatz
Power-mad king of the WCC
Posts: 26494
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'

Re: Beatles

Postby toomanyhatz » 08 Feb 2018, 02:11

jimboo wrote: Being objective starts with the very idea that they are not the alpha and omega of rock music.


As I've said before, I can sympathize with this view because I can understand if you're not a rabid fan you can get tired of the conventional wisdom that they are. However if you really look at it objectively, I think it's pretty obvious that, like it or not, they're a benchmark. Rebelling against that I can get. Denying that it's generally accepted as true I think requires deluding yourself at least a little.
sloopjohnc wrote:Aslan has some good credenitals - got his BA from Santa Clara, a Jesuit school and his Masters from Harvard and PhD from Santa Barbara, a surfing school.


1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017!

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 28767
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: Beatles

Postby Matt Wilson » 08 Feb 2018, 02:46

If you're white, middle aged, and male, and rock is your primary music, - then it's almost a given.

It's also the cliche to end all fucking cliches.

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 10619
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: Beatles

Postby Sneelock » 08 Feb 2018, 05:58

“Avoid cliches like the plague” - William Safire, well known as a Nixon speechwriter, not known to be a Beatles fan.
"Wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns.”

User avatar
soundchaser
Rokster & Rollster
Posts: 7734
Joined: 20 Jun 2006, 10:55

Re: Beatles

Postby soundchaser » 08 Feb 2018, 08:29

jimboo wrote:Emily was released before pepper though , wasn't it?


But it wasn't released before Rubber Soul, Revolver, or the single cuts, Day Tripper, & Rain.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 08 Feb 2018, 13:17

soundchaser wrote:
jimboo wrote:Emily was released before pepper though , wasn't it?


But it wasn't released before Rubber Soul, Revolver, or the single cuts, Day Tripper, & Rain.


Eh? I thought you were talking about British psychedelia , Tomorrow never knows is psych , nothing else you have mentioned is even close.
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
The Modernist
Posts: 10445
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Beatles

Postby The Modernist » 08 Feb 2018, 13:23

Rain definitely counts a psych as do 3 or 4 tracks from Revolver.
I mean this is just silly, The Beatles were the first UK band to release psychedelia. Do they not get any credit for that?

User avatar
Super-Jank
hounds people off the board
Posts: 15339
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: Beatles

Postby Super-Jank » 08 Feb 2018, 13:51

Matt’s just bitter they didn’t come out of the U.S. of A.
Diamond Dog wrote:and then we can have an adult debate about why you think there are 'over reaching' chord changes


Copehead wrote:I am a native speaker who got an A in O level English


K wrote:I think we all know that I would batter the fuck out of Coan.

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 28767
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: Beatles

Postby Matt Wilson » 08 Feb 2018, 14:27

I'm not the one arguing, you twat! :lol:

But since you're pulling me back in - someone needs to tell G the Beatles weren't the first UK band to release a psychedelic song.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 37559
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: 22,300 miles above the Earth

Re: Beatles

Postby Count Machuki » 08 Feb 2018, 14:42

G, Matt says the Beatles weren't the first UK band to release a psychedelic song.
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

User avatar
Hightea
Posts: 973
Joined: 16 Apr 2015, 02:18
Location: NY state

Re: Beatles

Postby Hightea » 08 Feb 2018, 14:44

yeah the Beatles were not important to rock. They never did anything original, didn't reinvent the wheel, didn't change rock music, weren't important to rock music, everyone who came after and before them were better and more influential, didn't influence any rock musicians, didn't have three top flight song writers and basically are unimportant to rock and roll. :roll:

User avatar
soundchaser
Rokster & Rollster
Posts: 7734
Joined: 20 Jun 2006, 10:55

Re: Beatles

Postby soundchaser » 08 Feb 2018, 14:55

jimboo wrote:
soundchaser wrote:
jimboo wrote:Emily was released before pepper though , wasn't it?


But it wasn't released before Rubber Soul, Revolver, or the single cuts, Day Tripper, & Rain.


Eh? I thought you were talking about British psychedelia , Tomorrow never knows is psych , nothing else you have mentioned is even close.


Songs on Rubber Soul, were leading the way towards psychedelia. Revolver, is drenched in it. Day Tripper, is code for LSD use, and Rain, well, if you don’t get that, I don’t know what else to say. I assure you, Syd Barrett would not have got to Piper At The Gates Of Dawn, without the revolution in the head that was coming his way from The Beatles.

User avatar
Super-Jank
hounds people off the board
Posts: 15339
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: Beatles

Postby Super-Jank » 08 Feb 2018, 15:18

Matt Wilson wrote:I'm not the one arguing, you twat! :lol:


So what were you up to about halfway down page 1? hm?
Diamond Dog wrote:and then we can have an adult debate about why you think there are 'over reaching' chord changes


Copehead wrote:I am a native speaker who got an A in O level English


K wrote:I think we all know that I would batter the fuck out of Coan.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 30914
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: Beatles

Postby Goat Boy » 08 Feb 2018, 15:42

Who's this Lownsdale fella anyway, huh?
Jimbo wrote:I'm on a we never went to the moon video tear these days - and it looks like we didn't.


The Slider on Prog Corner wrote:God, you lot are playing some right old shite in here

User avatar
Super-Jank
hounds people off the board
Posts: 15339
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Location: pursued by the enraged queen

Re: Beatles

Postby Super-Jank » 08 Feb 2018, 15:46

Isn't he Googa's mate?
Diamond Dog wrote:and then we can have an adult debate about why you think there are 'over reaching' chord changes


Copehead wrote:I am a native speaker who got an A in O level English


K wrote:I think we all know that I would batter the fuck out of Coan.