Beatles

Do talk back

?

yes
13
65%
no
7
35%
 
Total votes: 20

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 21:39

Of what , reinventing the wheel?
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
The Modernist
Posts: 10445
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Beatles

Postby The Modernist » 07 Feb 2018, 21:44

Of introducing sounds and song constructions that hadn't been heard in that way in pop music before.

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 28767
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: Beatles

Postby Matt Wilson » 07 Feb 2018, 21:48

The Modernist wrote:
Matt Wilson wrote:
The Modernist wrote:
All innovators and originators (I'm less sure about Muddy Waters though, but I don't have a great blues knowledge), but none were more original than The Beatles were.


Only a person with no knowledge of pre-rock music would say that Geraint.


Not at all, I'm quite secure in my knowledge when I say that. Because they were involved in the early stages of some American genres you might have more respect for them, but that doesn't mean they were more artistically original than The Beatles.


Of course it does, as those genres predate rock 'n' roll by decades. You're talking about sound effects on a rock record in 1966, I'm talking about starting entirely new genres of music that thousands of other musicians carried on with. It has nothing to do with what nationality the musicians are.

User avatar
nev harp
cultural defective
Posts: 14601
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: on parole

Re: Beatles

Postby nev harp » 07 Feb 2018, 21:52

George and Ringo were essential to The Beatles success.

George - The Beatles soul.

He had to wait a while to get his space but his trademark plangent drone (both voice and playing) were there from the start. Yes he wasn’t a guitar master, he got better as they went on and that meant that his playing matured in a ‘service of the song’ way rather than a “check this!” one. He was exactly good enough.

Just as important was his age. As the youngest he was the one that adolescents could identify with, “that’s me!”. They grew with him through it all.

Someone else can do Ringo.
Hip Someone who knows the score. Someone who understands jive talk Someone who is with it The expression is not subject to definition because, if you don't dig what it means, no one can ever tell you.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 21:52

Like Buddy Holly using strings or Chuck zapping his guitar and playing fast or Meek introducing new production techniques and sounds , maybe using a broken bottle top to make a new sound from a guitar.Using an amplifier to alter the natural sound of the electric guitar, creating the language of rock and roll , outrageous live performance or wearing matching uniforms, that sort of never seen before type of stuff?
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 30914
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: Beatles

Postby Goat Boy » 07 Feb 2018, 22:00

It's not just production and some funny sounds on records. That's incredibly reductionist. It's the originality of their melodies that changed so much too. It's the way they constructed songs, the odd things they did, the unusual influences (music hall, indian, classical, avant garde) that they integrated into their work. And it's not just the obvious stuff like Strawberry Fields either. I think there's a originality and otherness to, say She Loves You as well. Who the hell else ever sounded like that?
Jimbo wrote:I'm on a we never went to the moon video tear these days - and it looks like we didn't.


The Slider on Prog Corner wrote:God, you lot are playing some right old shite in here

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 28767
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: Beatles

Postby Matt Wilson » 07 Feb 2018, 22:01

Here's some British perspective, G.

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/ ... udy-claims

Turns out it's hip hop, all along!

User avatar
The Modernist
Posts: 10445
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Beatles

Postby The Modernist » 07 Feb 2018, 22:02

Matt Wilson wrote:
Of course it does, as those genres predate rock 'n' roll by decades. You're talking about sound effects on a rock record in 1966, I'm talking about starting entirely new genres of music that thousands of other musicians carried on with. It has nothing to do with what nationality the musicians are.


But none of those people invented those genres single-handedly Matt. They were all massively important in the development of those genres, just as The Beatles were massively important in the development of pop music. All this shows is you place a higher cultural worth to artists that work within a single genre.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 22:04

It takes on average about two posts on the Beatles with BCB before the jihad gene kicks in.
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 22:07

Goat Boy wrote:It's not just production and some funny sounds on records. That's incredibly reductionist. It's the originality of their melodies that changed so much too. It's the way they constructed songs, the odd things they did, the unusual influences (music hall, indian, classical, avant garde) that they integrated into their work. And it's not just the obvious stuff like Strawberry Fields either. I think there's a originality and otherness to, say She Loves You as well. Who the hell else ever sounded like that?


Well you know , put rave on against she loves you and what you got?
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
The Modernist
Posts: 10445
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Beatles

Postby The Modernist » 07 Feb 2018, 22:08

jimboo wrote:It takes on average about two posts on the Beatles with BCB before the jihad gene kicks in.


Or you can try and be objective. You're letting your own antipathy towards them colour your reasoning.
I'm no Hank Williams fan, but I wouldn't try and devalue his importance to country music.

User avatar
Diamond Dog
"Self Quoter" Extraordinaire.
Posts: 64712
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 21:04
Location: High On Poachers Hill

Re: Beatles

Postby Diamond Dog » 07 Feb 2018, 22:10

Diamond Dog wrote:
OCT wrote:Say something you’ve never said (here) about them before.



They would have been equally successful without Harrison or Starr - indeed, musically, they may have actually been better.


I guess this needs emphasising... the original post doesn't state you actually have to believe in the statement. :roll:
Bruce Springsteen wrote: May the living let us in/Before the dead tear us apart"

User avatar
WG Kaspar
Posts: 8532
Joined: 28 Jan 2007, 09:07

Re: Beatles

Postby WG Kaspar » 07 Feb 2018, 22:10

I think they were pretty good. I like them.
I run out of talent

User avatar
Goat Boy
Bogarting the joint
Posts: 30914
Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
Location: In the perfumed garden

Re: Beatles

Postby Goat Boy » 07 Feb 2018, 22:10

jimboo wrote:
Goat Boy wrote:It's not just production and some funny sounds on records. That's incredibly reductionist. It's the originality of their melodies that changed so much too. It's the way they constructed songs, the odd things they did, the unusual influences (music hall, indian, classical, avant garde) that they integrated into their work. And it's not just the obvious stuff like Strawberry Fields either. I think there's a originality and otherness to, say She Loves You as well. Who the hell else ever sounded like that?


Well you know , put rave on against she loves you and what you got?


Not She Loves You.
Jimbo wrote:I'm on a we never went to the moon video tear these days - and it looks like we didn't.


The Slider on Prog Corner wrote:God, you lot are playing some right old shite in here

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 22:16

No Moddie , you don't have a clue as to how I feel when I listen to the Beatles. Being objective starts with the very idea that they are not the alpha and omega of rock music.You may waste your time scrutinizing every record in your collection and concluding that the boys didn't just find the dna strand they actually made it , I hear a fucking good band , oh yeah. But for thrills , chills and truly 'fuck me' moments,they are surpassed over and over again.
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
The Modernist
Posts: 10445
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Beatles

Postby The Modernist » 07 Feb 2018, 22:19

Matt Wilson wrote:Here's some British perspective, G.

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2015/ ... udy-claims

Turns out it's hip hop, all along!


A great example of why scientists shouldn't get involved in any form of cultural analysis.

User avatar
The Modernist
Posts: 10445
Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42

Re: Beatles

Postby The Modernist » 07 Feb 2018, 22:25

jimboo wrote:No Moddie , you don't have a clue as to how I feel when I listen to the Beatles. Being objective starts with the very idea that they are not the alpha and omega of rock music.You may waste your time scrutinizing every record in your collection and concluding that the boys didn't just find the dna strand they actually made it , I hear a fucking good band , oh yeah. But for thrills , chills and truly 'fuck me' moments,they are surpassed over and over again.


In your opinion and that's fine..but that's just an expression of your subjective taste again.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 22:29

Now you're just beginning to sound like a nut.
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.

User avatar
nev harp
cultural defective
Posts: 14601
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
Location: on parole

Re: Beatles

Postby nev harp » 07 Feb 2018, 22:30

I Am the Walnut
Hip Someone who knows the score. Someone who understands jive talk Someone who is with it The expression is not subject to definition because, if you don't dig what it means, no one can ever tell you.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 6530
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles

Postby jimboo » 07 Feb 2018, 22:32

I buried Paul.
Goat Boy wrote:Oh, do fuck off, prog boy.