Beatles 71 - Part I

Do talk back

Tracks for Beatles 71

Give Peace a Chance
5
3%
Cold Turkey
10
5%
Instant Karma!
19
10%
The Lovely Linda
0
No votes
That Would Be Something
3
2%
Valentine Day
0
No votes
Every Night
11
6%
Hot as Sun/Glasses
1
1%
Junk
5
3%
Man We Was Lonely
2
1%
Oo You
1
1%
Momma Miss America
0
No votes
Teddy Boy
1
1%
Singalong Junk
2
1%
Maybe I'm Amazed
19
10%
Kreen - Akrore
0
No votes
Beaucoups of Blues
6
3%
Love Don't Last Long
0
No votes
Fastest Growing Heartache in the West
0
No votes
Without Her
0
No votes
Woman of the Night
0
No votes
I'd Be Talking All the Time
0
No votes
$15 Draw
0
No votes
Wine, Women and Loud Happy Songs
1
1%
I Wouldn't Have You Any Other Way
0
No votes
Loser's Lounge
0
No votes
Waiting
0
No votes
Silent Homecoming
0
No votes
I'd Have You Anytime
5
3%
My Sweet Lord
17
9%
Wah-Wah
8
4%
Isn't It a Pity (Version One)
12
6%
What Is Life
13
7%
If Not for You
7
4%
Behind That Locked Door
4
2%
Let It Down
5
3%
Run of the Mill
2
1%
Beware of Darkness
9
5%
Apple Scruffs
1
1%
Ballad of Sir Frankie Crisp (Let It Roll)
4
2%
Awaiting on You All
3
2%
All Things Must Pass
15
8%
I Dig Love
1
1%
 
Total votes: 192

User avatar
Osgood
Posts: 1946
Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
Location: Madrid

Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Osgood » 21 Jul 2017, 09:56

I suppose this has been done many times, but maybe not this way.

Using the solo Beatles output from 69 up to mid 71, what tracks would you include in a "Beatles 71" album?

I have included all tracks from their albums and singles from Give Peace a Chance up to Imagine. The only exclusions are the jam elpee from ATMP and Sentimental Journey, as I don't think either of them are remotely candidates for inclusions in a Beatles album. Also excluded are Yoko's B-Sides.

(I am doing this in two parts because maximum options in a poll are 50 - I am allowing 12 picks per poll, do what you like with that, it could have been a double album, why not? - tracks are ordered chronologically)
Last edited by Osgood on 21 Jul 2017, 17:30, edited 2 times in total.
Nobody's ferpect.

User avatar
jimboo
Posts: 7316
Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
Location: taking a foxy kind of stand

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby jimboo » 21 Jul 2017, 12:57

Just buy all things must pass . Oh , hang on , that was 1970 right ?
If I jerk- the handle jerk- the handle you'll thrill me and thrill me

User avatar
Osgood
Posts: 1946
Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
Location: Madrid

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Osgood » 21 Jul 2017, 16:01

jimboo wrote:Just buy all things must pass . Oh , hang on , that was 1970 right ?

Yes, the period I'm considering is completely arbitrary. Basically it goes from the release of Abbey Road (but I made a mistake, Give Peace a Chance was released before AR) up to Imagine. Why Imagine? Because I wanted to vote for Gimme Some Truth. So, Let It Be was never released, maybe just a couple of singles, and they kept working together for two years on a new album. The question is: which songs would make the cut?
Or differently, which songs would you wish they had done as a band?
Nobody's ferpect.

User avatar
Walk In My Shadow
Hello Laydeez
Posts: 38731
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 20:02
Location: The Good, the Bad, both ugly
Contact:

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Walk In My Shadow » 21 Jul 2017, 19:47

This Ringo album doesn't fit what the Beatles were doing.

For me it would be more of a George album than a Lennon/Macca one.

Except for Maybe I'm amazed of course.

And I wouldn't include If Not For You because they weren't doing covers anymore.
Beneluxfunkmeisterlurvegod


Image

User avatar
toomanyhatz
Power-mad king of the WCC
Posts: 29993
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby toomanyhatz » 21 Jul 2017, 20:11

Yeah, there's no way to split this up the way they would have done it. George had at least half the songs worth recording, and they never would have done that.

For what it's worth, though, I went with the best 7 or 8, and added "Maybe I'm Amazed," "Every Night," "Beaucoups of Blues," and every Lennon single.
Footy wrote:
The Who / Jimi Hendrix Experience Saville Theatre, London Jan '67
. Got Jimi's autograph after the show and went on to see him several times that year


1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020!! 2023?

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 21 Jul 2017, 20:54

Not enough John on this list!
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
Osgood
Posts: 1946
Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
Location: Madrid

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Osgood » 21 Jul 2017, 21:14

Davey the Fat Boy wrote:Not enough John on this list!

Plastic Ono Band and Imagine tracks are on part II poll
Nobody's ferpect.

User avatar
Walk In My Shadow
Hello Laydeez
Posts: 38731
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 20:02
Location: The Good, the Bad, both ugly
Contact:

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Walk In My Shadow » 21 Jul 2017, 21:17

So we wait for the 'Ringo' album to come out 8-)
Beneluxfunkmeisterlurvegod


Image

User avatar
Osgood
Posts: 1946
Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
Location: Madrid

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Osgood » 21 Jul 2017, 21:22

Walk In My Shadow wrote:So we wait for the 'Ringo' album to come out 8-)

Yeah, Photograph would have been a perfect Beatles song
Nobody's ferpect.

User avatar
Sneelock
Posts: 14077
Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
Location: Lincoln Head City

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Sneelock » 21 Jul 2017, 21:28

Ringo didn't make perfect Beatles songs until after the Beatles broke up.
uggy poopy doody.

User avatar
naughty boy
hounds people off the board
Posts: 20266
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby naughty boy » 21 Jul 2017, 21:47

These poll results make a lot more sense than the other one.

'Maybe I'm Amazed', 'Instant Karma', and a whole load of George. What happy times to live in!
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.

User avatar
Walk In My Shadow
Hello Laydeez
Posts: 38731
Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 20:02
Location: The Good, the Bad, both ugly
Contact:

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Walk In My Shadow » 21 Jul 2017, 21:51

The 4 were always going to make solo records after the split. That was almost a given.

But what if, what if they didn't split but had gone through a cooling off period of a couple of years.

Not counting the experimental albums of John and George, their best solo songs would have made a fantastic double album.

But I'm not saying anything new here.


P.S. Ringo told the other 3 to fuck off when he made an album of 40's standards and then a Country album.
Well done Richard!
Beneluxfunkmeisterlurvegod


Image

User avatar
naughty boy
hounds people off the board
Posts: 20266
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby naughty boy » 21 Jul 2017, 21:54

Walk In My Shadow wrote:Not counting the experimental albums of John and George, their best solo songs would have made a fantastic double album.


I don't think anyone sane would doubt that.

I think the hypothetical collection would be their best since The Beatles.
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 16283
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby bobzilla77 » 22 Jul 2017, 00:50

The more I think about it the more it makes sense for them to break up and make solo records.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
toomanyhatz
Power-mad king of the WCC
Posts: 29993
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby toomanyhatz » 22 Jul 2017, 01:14

Another interesting question to me is which of these would have been great Beatles songs. My vote for the top ones of these:

Cold Turkey
Instant Karma
Every Night
Isn't it a Pity
Beacoups of Blues
All Things Must Pass
Footy wrote:
The Who / Jimi Hendrix Experience Saville Theatre, London Jan '67
. Got Jimi's autograph after the show and went on to see him several times that year


1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020!! 2023?

User avatar
Osgood
Posts: 1946
Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
Location: Madrid

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Osgood » 22 Jul 2017, 07:27

toomanyhatz wrote:Another interesting question to me is which of these would have been great Beatles songs.

Erm... that was the question in the original post.

And I am surprised that so many people answer My Sweet Lord. I don't think that could have been a Beatles song.
Nobody's ferpect.

User avatar
Osgood
Posts: 1946
Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
Location: Madrid

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Osgood » 22 Jul 2017, 09:24

bobzilla77 wrote:The more I think about it the more it makes sense for them to break up and make solo records.

We could imagine (npi) a scenario of solo records followed by a Beatles album. But probably the best tracks would have gone to the solo records.

I always thought that Maybe I'm Amazed would have been a fantastic Beatles song
Nobody's ferpect.

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 22 Jul 2017, 16:22

Osgood wrote:Yes, the period I'm considering is completely arbitrary. Basically it goes from the release of Abbey Road (but I made a mistake, Give Peace a Chance was released before AR) up to Imagine.


For what it's worth, here's our April 10, 1970 to Oct 1973 Black Album thread:

viewtopic.php?t=126167

I worked pretty hard to come up with something for that. Not sure I can put out the effort again!
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.

User avatar
Davey the Fat Boy
Posts: 24007
Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
Location: Applebees

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby Davey the Fat Boy » 22 Jul 2017, 16:40

Not to piss on the thread. It's fun to think about. But the internal dynamics of the group bring what they were, I just don't think that a Beatles album released during this time would look much like this. The whole point of the solo albums was that they were all at least partially defined by the liberation of no longer having to please the others. I don't think a lot of these songs would have been written or considered in a group context.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo

Image

User avatar
BARON CORNY DOG
Diamond Geezer
Posts: 45153
Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality

Re: Beatles 71 - Part I

Postby BARON CORNY DOG » 22 Jul 2017, 16:58

They hadn't written songs in a "group context" for five years at this point!
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.


Return to “Yakety Yak”