Beatles 71 - Part I
- Osgood
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
- Location: Madrid
Beatles 71 - Part I
I suppose this has been done many times, but maybe not this way.
Using the solo Beatles output from 69 up to mid 71, what tracks would you include in a "Beatles 71" album?
I have included all tracks from their albums and singles from Give Peace a Chance up to Imagine. The only exclusions are the jam elpee from ATMP and Sentimental Journey, as I don't think either of them are remotely candidates for inclusions in a Beatles album. Also excluded are Yoko's B-Sides.
(I am doing this in two parts because maximum options in a poll are 50 - I am allowing 12 picks per poll, do what you like with that, it could have been a double album, why not? - tracks are ordered chronologically)
Using the solo Beatles output from 69 up to mid 71, what tracks would you include in a "Beatles 71" album?
I have included all tracks from their albums and singles from Give Peace a Chance up to Imagine. The only exclusions are the jam elpee from ATMP and Sentimental Journey, as I don't think either of them are remotely candidates for inclusions in a Beatles album. Also excluded are Yoko's B-Sides.
(I am doing this in two parts because maximum options in a poll are 50 - I am allowing 12 picks per poll, do what you like with that, it could have been a double album, why not? - tracks are ordered chronologically)
Last edited by Osgood on 21 Jul 2017, 17:30, edited 2 times in total.
Nobody's ferpect.
- jimboo
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
- Location: taking a foxy kind of stand
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Just buy all things must pass . Oh , hang on , that was 1970 right ?
If I jerk- the handle jerk- the handle you'll thrill me and thrill me
- Osgood
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
- Location: Madrid
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
jimboo wrote:Just buy all things must pass . Oh , hang on , that was 1970 right ?
Yes, the period I'm considering is completely arbitrary. Basically it goes from the release of Abbey Road (but I made a mistake, Give Peace a Chance was released before AR) up to Imagine. Why Imagine? Because I wanted to vote for Gimme Some Truth. So, Let It Be was never released, maybe just a couple of singles, and they kept working together for two years on a new album. The question is: which songs would make the cut?
Or differently, which songs would you wish they had done as a band?
Nobody's ferpect.
- Walk In My Shadow
- Hello Laydeez
- Posts: 38731
- Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 20:02
- Location: The Good, the Bad, both ugly
- Contact:
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
This Ringo album doesn't fit what the Beatles were doing.
For me it would be more of a George album than a Lennon/Macca one.
Except for Maybe I'm amazed of course.
And I wouldn't include If Not For You because they weren't doing covers anymore.
For me it would be more of a George album than a Lennon/Macca one.
Except for Maybe I'm amazed of course.
And I wouldn't include If Not For You because they weren't doing covers anymore.
Beneluxfunkmeisterlurvegod
- toomanyhatz
- Power-mad king of the WCC
- Posts: 29993
- Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
- Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Yeah, there's no way to split this up the way they would have done it. George had at least half the songs worth recording, and they never would have done that.
For what it's worth, though, I went with the best 7 or 8, and added "Maybe I'm Amazed," "Every Night," "Beaucoups of Blues," and every Lennon single.
For what it's worth, though, I went with the best 7 or 8, and added "Maybe I'm Amazed," "Every Night," "Beaucoups of Blues," and every Lennon single.
Footy wrote:
The Who / Jimi Hendrix Experience Saville Theatre, London Jan '67
. Got Jimi's autograph after the show and went on to see him several times that year
1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020!! 2023?
- Davey the Fat Boy
- Posts: 24007
- Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
- Location: Applebees
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Not enough John on this list!
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo
- Osgood
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
- Location: Madrid
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Davey the Fat Boy wrote:Not enough John on this list!
Plastic Ono Band and Imagine tracks are on part II poll
Nobody's ferpect.
- Walk In My Shadow
- Hello Laydeez
- Posts: 38731
- Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 20:02
- Location: The Good, the Bad, both ugly
- Contact:
- Osgood
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
- Location: Madrid
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Walk In My Shadow wrote:So we wait for the 'Ringo' album to come out
Yeah, Photograph would have been a perfect Beatles song
Nobody's ferpect.
- Sneelock
- Posts: 14077
- Joined: 19 Nov 2011, 23:56
- Location: Lincoln Head City
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Ringo didn't make perfect Beatles songs until after the Beatles broke up.
uggy poopy doody.
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20266
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
These poll results make a lot more sense than the other one.
'Maybe I'm Amazed', 'Instant Karma', and a whole load of George. What happy times to live in!
'Maybe I'm Amazed', 'Instant Karma', and a whole load of George. What happy times to live in!
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.
- Walk In My Shadow
- Hello Laydeez
- Posts: 38731
- Joined: 23 Jul 2003, 20:02
- Location: The Good, the Bad, both ugly
- Contact:
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
The 4 were always going to make solo records after the split. That was almost a given.
But what if, what if they didn't split but had gone through a cooling off period of a couple of years.
Not counting the experimental albums of John and George, their best solo songs would have made a fantastic double album.
But I'm not saying anything new here.
P.S. Ringo told the other 3 to fuck off when he made an album of 40's standards and then a Country album.
Well done Richard!
But what if, what if they didn't split but had gone through a cooling off period of a couple of years.
Not counting the experimental albums of John and George, their best solo songs would have made a fantastic double album.
But I'm not saying anything new here.
P.S. Ringo told the other 3 to fuck off when he made an album of 40's standards and then a Country album.
Well done Richard!
Beneluxfunkmeisterlurvegod
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20266
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Walk In My Shadow wrote:Not counting the experimental albums of John and George, their best solo songs would have made a fantastic double album.
I don't think anyone sane would doubt that.
I think the hypothetical collection would be their best since The Beatles.
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.
- bobzilla77
- Posts: 16283
- Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
- Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
The more I think about it the more it makes sense for them to break up and make solo records.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.
- toomanyhatz
- Power-mad king of the WCC
- Posts: 29993
- Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
- Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Another interesting question to me is which of these would have been great Beatles songs. My vote for the top ones of these:
Cold Turkey
Instant Karma
Every Night
Isn't it a Pity
Beacoups of Blues
All Things Must Pass
Cold Turkey
Instant Karma
Every Night
Isn't it a Pity
Beacoups of Blues
All Things Must Pass
Footy wrote:
The Who / Jimi Hendrix Experience Saville Theatre, London Jan '67
. Got Jimi's autograph after the show and went on to see him several times that year
1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020!! 2023?
- Osgood
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
- Location: Madrid
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
toomanyhatz wrote:Another interesting question to me is which of these would have been great Beatles songs.
Erm... that was the question in the original post.
And I am surprised that so many people answer My Sweet Lord. I don't think that could have been a Beatles song.
Nobody's ferpect.
- Osgood
- Posts: 1946
- Joined: 28 Nov 2014, 09:48
- Location: Madrid
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
bobzilla77 wrote:The more I think about it the more it makes sense for them to break up and make solo records.
We could imagine (npi) a scenario of solo records followed by a Beatles album. But probably the best tracks would have gone to the solo records.
I always thought that Maybe I'm Amazed would have been a fantastic Beatles song
Nobody's ferpect.
- BARON CORNY DOG
- Diamond Geezer
- Posts: 45153
- Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
- Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Osgood wrote:Yes, the period I'm considering is completely arbitrary. Basically it goes from the release of Abbey Road (but I made a mistake, Give Peace a Chance was released before AR) up to Imagine.
For what it's worth, here's our April 10, 1970 to Oct 1973 Black Album thread:
viewtopic.php?t=126167
I worked pretty hard to come up with something for that. Not sure I can put out the effort again!
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.
- Davey the Fat Boy
- Posts: 24007
- Joined: 05 Jan 2006, 02:55
- Location: Applebees
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
Not to piss on the thread. It's fun to think about. But the internal dynamics of the group bring what they were, I just don't think that a Beatles album released during this time would look much like this. The whole point of the solo albums was that they were all at least partially defined by the liberation of no longer having to please the others. I don't think a lot of these songs would have been written or considered in a group context.
“Remember I have said good things about benevolent despots before.” - Jimbo
- BARON CORNY DOG
- Diamond Geezer
- Posts: 45153
- Joined: 18 Jul 2003, 05:38
- Location: Impregnable Citadel of Technicality
Re: Beatles 71 - Part I
They hadn't written songs in a "group context" for five years at this point!
take5_d_shorterer wrote:If John Bonham simply didn't listen to enough Tommy Johnson or Blind Willie Mctell, that's his doing.