Crimso v The Softs
- C
- Robust
- Posts: 78995
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 19:06
Crimso v The Softs
Why?
Incidentally, in case you haven't seen this
http://www.elephant-talk.com/wiki/FAQ_- ... imson_Past
.
Incidentally, in case you haven't seen this
http://www.elephant-talk.com/wiki/FAQ_- ... imson_Past
.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
- algroth
- Posts: 5714
- Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 03:12
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Between Crimso and the Softs I'll take Crimso, but between Fripp and Wyatt I'll take Wyatt.
- C
- Robust
- Posts: 78995
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 19:06
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Over Wyatt I'd take John Marshall, Karl Jenkins, Roy Babbington, Mike Ratledge, Hugh Hopper, Elton Dean, Allan Holdsworth, Ric Sanders, John Etheridge...
As much as I love Robert's voice and solo albums (which I have them all) he wasn't good enough for The Softs post Volume 2 (Moon in June notwithstanding)
.
As much as I love Robert's voice and solo albums (which I have them all) he wasn't good enough for The Softs post Volume 2 (Moon in June notwithstanding)
.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
- Charlie O.
- Posts: 44848
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:53
- Location: In-A-Badda-La-Wadda, bay-beh
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Post-Third Softs weren't deserving of Wyatt, in my opinion. And I like some of that later stuff.
(And yes, I know they kicked him out. That doesn't disprove my view.)
This is one of those contests that's hard to judge, even if we limit it to the era when both bands were active. On the one hand, Crimso probably made more music during that time frame that I really like/love. On the other hand, the relatively small quantity of SM stuff that I love, I love more deeply and enthusiastically than anything Fripp & pals did.
I'm giving it to the Soft Machine.
(And yes, I know they kicked him out. That doesn't disprove my view.)
This is one of those contests that's hard to judge, even if we limit it to the era when both bands were active. On the one hand, Crimso probably made more music during that time frame that I really like/love. On the other hand, the relatively small quantity of SM stuff that I love, I love more deeply and enthusiastically than anything Fripp & pals did.
I'm giving it to the Soft Machine.
- algroth
- Posts: 5714
- Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 03:12
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Charlie O. wrote:Post-Third Softs weren't deserving of Wyatt, in my opinion. And I like some of that later stuff.
This, pretty much. Only that I don't really like much of that later stuff. To me Vol 2 is the Softs at their peak and it was a pretty steep fall since.
- C
- Robust
- Posts: 78995
- Joined: 22 Jul 2003, 19:06
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Valid points lads.
Valid points
The Softs reinvented themselves about 5 times.
Music is a brutal industry - yes they did boot out Robert but they did the same with Mike Ratledge (who 'guested' in his own band (!) before 'departing' entirely for the last album)
For me every album was seminally robust.
As much as I love the albums up to Red - The Softs, for me, has it
.
Valid points
The Softs reinvented themselves about 5 times.
Music is a brutal industry - yes they did boot out Robert but they did the same with Mike Ratledge (who 'guested' in his own band (!) before 'departing' entirely for the last album)
For me every album was seminally robust.
As much as I love the albums up to Red - The Softs, for me, has it
.
Lord Rother wrote:And there was me thinking you'd say "Fair enough, you have a point Bob".
- Snarfyguy
- Dominated by the Obscure
- Posts: 53502
- Joined: 21 Jul 2003, 19:04
- Location: New York
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Agree with Charlie and Al.
It's a good point about RW's departure from the Softs. He got out just in time. Should have got out earlier, even.
It's a good point about RW's departure from the Softs. He got out just in time. Should have got out earlier, even.
GoogaMooga wrote: The further away from home you go, the greater the risk of getting stuck there.
- Hightea
- Posts: 4364
- Joined: 16 Apr 2015, 02:18
- Location: NY state
Re: Crimso v The Softs
eek tough call, both these bands have multiple excellent albums
In the Court of the Crimson King (1969) 5
In the Wake of Poseidon (1970) 5
Lizard (1970) 4
Islands (1971) 4
Larks' Tongues in Aspic (1973) 5
Starless and Bible Black (1974) 4
Red (1974) 5
Discipline (1981) 5
THRAK (1995) 4
1968: The Soft Machine 4 1/2
1969: Volume Two 4 1/2
1970: Third 5
1971: Fourth 4
1972: Fifth 4
1973: Six 4
1973: Seven 5
1975: Bundles 41/2
1976: Softs 4
In the end I'll give it to King Crimson as their live show and live albums are superior.
can't wait to see them again this summer
In the Court of the Crimson King (1969) 5
In the Wake of Poseidon (1970) 5
Lizard (1970) 4
Islands (1971) 4
Larks' Tongues in Aspic (1973) 5
Starless and Bible Black (1974) 4
Red (1974) 5
Discipline (1981) 5
THRAK (1995) 4
1968: The Soft Machine 4 1/2
1969: Volume Two 4 1/2
1970: Third 5
1971: Fourth 4
1972: Fifth 4
1973: Six 4
1973: Seven 5
1975: Bundles 41/2
1976: Softs 4
In the end I'll give it to King Crimson as their live show and live albums are superior.
can't wait to see them again this summer
- joels344
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 17:37
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
Re: Crimso v The Softs
This is an interesting one, so I have to break it down by making some album/career comparisons.
Soft Machine had the strongest run of consecutive albums i.e., The Soft Machine, Volume Two, and Third. I consider all of these albums classics in the progressive genre. Each album presented sonic growth, evolution and signs of maturity as a group. However, after this brilliant run, the band descends into wanky, jazz-rock territory too much for my interest. Charlie O was correct in saying that Post-Third Softs did not deserve the musical mind of Robert Wyatt. They just became another 70's jazz-rock/fusion band and never really grew any after Fourth.
On the other hand, King Crimson were a band that had an incredibly strong run from 1969-1981. Outside of a few duds, namely, Islands and Starless and Bible Black, they were consistently releasing brilliant and innovative material. They also released some absolute masterpieces like In the Court of the Crimson King, Red and Larks' Tongues in Aspic. Those albums are arguably superior to any Soft Machine release. Post-Discipline King Crimson is even more redeemable than Post-Third Soft Machine, insofar as them branching out and experimenting with different ideas. The only late-Crimso album I consider remotely interesting and listenable is The Power to Believe. Though both eras represent the weakest aspects of their respective careers.
So, I'm going with King Crimson here.
Soft Machine had the strongest run of consecutive albums i.e., The Soft Machine, Volume Two, and Third. I consider all of these albums classics in the progressive genre. Each album presented sonic growth, evolution and signs of maturity as a group. However, after this brilliant run, the band descends into wanky, jazz-rock territory too much for my interest. Charlie O was correct in saying that Post-Third Softs did not deserve the musical mind of Robert Wyatt. They just became another 70's jazz-rock/fusion band and never really grew any after Fourth.
On the other hand, King Crimson were a band that had an incredibly strong run from 1969-1981. Outside of a few duds, namely, Islands and Starless and Bible Black, they were consistently releasing brilliant and innovative material. They also released some absolute masterpieces like In the Court of the Crimson King, Red and Larks' Tongues in Aspic. Those albums are arguably superior to any Soft Machine release. Post-Discipline King Crimson is even more redeemable than Post-Third Soft Machine, insofar as them branching out and experimenting with different ideas. The only late-Crimso album I consider remotely interesting and listenable is The Power to Believe. Though both eras represent the weakest aspects of their respective careers.
So, I'm going with King Crimson here.
90s Cup Champion, The Prog Cup 2019 Champion
- ConnyOlivetti
- Probing The Sonic Heritage
- Posts: 10588
- Joined: 06 Nov 2003, 07:14
- Location: Below The North Pole
- Contact:
Re: Crimso v The Softs
joels344 wrote: The only late-Crimso album I consider remotely interesting and listenable is The Power to Believe.
My fav by the late era Crimson!
Truly great!
And to think they delivered a turd before that one!
Charlie O. wrote:I think Coan and Googa are right.
Un enfant dans electronica!
Je suis!
- joels344
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 17:37
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
Re: Crimso v The Softs
ConnyOlivetti wrote:joels344 wrote: The only late-Crimso album I consider remotely interesting and listenable is The Power to Believe.
My fav by the late era Crimson!
Truly great!
And to think they delivered a turd before that one!
The ConstruKction of Light is embarrassing. Probably their worst album ever.
90s Cup Champion, The Prog Cup 2019 Champion
- ConnyOlivetti
- Probing The Sonic Heritage
- Posts: 10588
- Joined: 06 Nov 2003, 07:14
- Location: Below The North Pole
- Contact:
Re: Crimso v The Softs
joels344 wrote:ConnyOlivetti wrote:joels344 wrote: The only late-Crimso album I consider remotely interesting and listenable is The Power to Believe.
My fav by the late era Crimson!
Truly great!
And to think they delivered a turd before that one!
The ConstruKction of Light is embarrassing. Probably their worst album ever.
Are you sure we are not related, in some way?
Charlie O. wrote:I think Coan and Googa are right.
Un enfant dans electronica!
Je suis!
-
- Posts: 16158
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:43
Re: Crimso v The Softs
joels344 wrote:This is an interesting one, so I have to break it down by making some album/career comparisons.
Soft Machine had the strongest run of consecutive albums i.e., The Soft Machine, Volume Two, and Third. I consider all of these albums classics in the progressive genre. Each album presented sonic growth, evolution and signs of maturity as a group. However, after this brilliant run, the band descends into wanky, jazz-rock territory too much for my interest. Charlie O was correct in saying that Post-Third Softs did not deserve the musical mind of Robert Wyatt. They just became another 70's jazz-rock/fusion band and never really grew any after Fourth.
On the other hand, King Crimson were a band that had an incredibly strong run from 1969-1981. Outside of a few duds, namely, Islands and Starless and Bible Black, they were consistently releasing brilliant and innovative material. They also released some absolute masterpieces like In the Court of the Crimson King, Red and Larks' Tongues in Aspic. Those albums are arguably superior to any Soft Machine release. Post-Discipline King Crimson is even more redeemable than Post-Third Soft Machine, insofar as them branching out and experimenting with different ideas. The only late-Crimso album I consider remotely interesting and listenable is The Power to Believe. Though both eras represent the weakest aspects of their respective careers.
So, I'm going with King Crimson here.
Neither Islands nor Starless And Bible Black are duds.
- joels344
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 17:37
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Hugh wrote:joels344 wrote:This is an interesting one, so I have to break it down by making some album/career comparisons.
Soft Machine had the strongest run of consecutive albums i.e., The Soft Machine, Volume Two, and Third. I consider all of these albums classics in the progressive genre. Each album presented sonic growth, evolution and signs of maturity as a group. However, after this brilliant run, the band descends into wanky, jazz-rock territory too much for my interest. Charlie O was correct in saying that Post-Third Softs did not deserve the musical mind of Robert Wyatt. They just became another 70's jazz-rock/fusion band and never really grew any after Fourth.
On the other hand, King Crimson were a band that had an incredibly strong run from 1969-1981. Outside of a few duds, namely, Islands and Starless and Bible Black, they were consistently releasing brilliant and innovative material. They also released some absolute masterpieces like In the Court of the Crimson King, Red and Larks' Tongues in Aspic. Those albums are arguably superior to any Soft Machine release. Post-Discipline King Crimson is even more redeemable than Post-Third Soft Machine, insofar as them branching out and experimenting with different ideas. The only late-Crimso album I consider remotely interesting and listenable is The Power to Believe. Though both eras represent the weakest aspects of their respective careers.
So, I'm going with King Crimson here.
Neither Islands nor Starless And Bible Black are duds.
Islands is an album that I don't like at all and would place among Beat and The ConstruKction of Light, in terms of "worst King Crimson" albums. It's a forgettable experience really. Starless and Bible Black has some aspects and tracks that I enjoy, but I wasn't convinced by that album when compared to the other releases from the Wetton-era Crimson.
90s Cup Champion, The Prog Cup 2019 Champion
-
- Posts: 16158
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:43
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Islands is top 5 Crimson for me.
- ConnyOlivetti
- Probing The Sonic Heritage
- Posts: 10588
- Joined: 06 Nov 2003, 07:14
- Location: Below The North Pole
- Contact:
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Hugh wrote:Islands is top 5 Crimson for me.
Robust for sure!
Charlie O. wrote:I think Coan and Googa are right.
Un enfant dans electronica!
Je suis!
- toomanyhatz
- Power-mad king of the WCC
- Posts: 29992
- Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
- Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Softs and it's not close. Crimson has a bunch of albums I like. The Softs have two I love (the first two) and many I like. Nothing by Crimson - and yes, that includes the debut - comes close to the best Softs.
Footy wrote:
The Who / Jimi Hendrix Experience Saville Theatre, London Jan '67
. Got Jimi's autograph after the show and went on to see him several times that year
1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020!! 2023?
- The Slider
- Self-Aggrandising Cock
- Posts: 48262
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:05
- Location: I'm only here for the sneer
- Contact:
Re: Crimso v The Softs
I'm bewildered.
I like the first two Softs - and 1/4 of the third.
Apart from that - a huge meh.
Crim all the way.
I have grown to love Islands.
It is Lizard that I have almost no love for.
Starless is great, apart from the aimless jamming
Anything that features Adrian Belew doesn't really come on my Crimdar.
I like the first two Softs - and 1/4 of the third.
Apart from that - a huge meh.
Crim all the way.
I have grown to love Islands.
It is Lizard that I have almost no love for.
Starless is great, apart from the aimless jamming
Anything that features Adrian Belew doesn't really come on my Crimdar.
Complete Ramones Mp3 set on its way
- frimley_greener
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: 10 Apr 2010, 10:00
- Location: frimley green..and it ain't easy being green...
Re: Crimso v The Softs
There are pieces from the Soft's that I will take to the grave with me..Nothing from Crimson will accompany me to the afterlife:)
You wanna be a big cop in a small town? Fuck off up the model village.
- Quaco
- F R double E
- Posts: 47382
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:41
Re: Crimso v The Softs
Basically agree with Slider, although I like Lizard as well as the aimless jamming as long as Wetton is involved. KC had more great music, even though I love the first three SM albums dearly.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -