Bowie/Beatles comparisons
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20266
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Is there anyone here who resists the idea that Bowie did for the 70s what the Fabs did for the 60s?
Although The Beatles were more universal, Bowie also put out more than his fair share of anthemic, flag-waving stuff for the masses. 'Heroes' might have been about an alcoholic (I think! he was never very forthcoming about it) but as usual the British public heard singalonga and they took it to their hearts in the way they did 'Hey Jude'. And 'Life On Mars' might be his 'A Day In The Life', if you want highly-regarded meaningless-profound examples.
I'm not sure DB thought of himself as much of a songwriter, but there are shitloads of hummable ditties. With 'Kooks', 'Starman' and 'The Prettiest Star' he might have taken on the guise of McCartney more than Lennon.
Right now, in the UK, I don't think there's a huge gap between the two artists as far as assessment goes.
HE might not have talked about THEM much, actually. If that matters.
Although The Beatles were more universal, Bowie also put out more than his fair share of anthemic, flag-waving stuff for the masses. 'Heroes' might have been about an alcoholic (I think! he was never very forthcoming about it) but as usual the British public heard singalonga and they took it to their hearts in the way they did 'Hey Jude'. And 'Life On Mars' might be his 'A Day In The Life', if you want highly-regarded meaningless-profound examples.
I'm not sure DB thought of himself as much of a songwriter, but there are shitloads of hummable ditties. With 'Kooks', 'Starman' and 'The Prettiest Star' he might have taken on the guise of McCartney more than Lennon.
Right now, in the UK, I don't think there's a huge gap between the two artists as far as assessment goes.
HE might not have talked about THEM much, actually. If that matters.
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.
- clive gash
- wannabee enfant terrible
- Posts: 17219
- Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
- Location: down the rabbit hole
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Nah.
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.
Diamond Dog wrote:...it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce...
...a multitude of innuendo and hearsay...
...I'm producing facts here...
- jimboo
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
- Location: taking a foxy kind of stand
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
What do you mean the Beatles are more universal ?
If I jerk- the handle jerk- the handle you'll thrill me and thrill me
- Goat Boy
- Bogarting the joint
- Posts: 32974
- Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
- Location: In the perfumed garden
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
It's interesting that ian MacDonald apparently planned on doing a Revolution in the Head book for 70s Bowie.
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.
Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20266
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Going well isn't it LADS?
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.
- Goat Boy
- Bogarting the joint
- Posts: 32974
- Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
- Location: In the perfumed garden
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
About as well as my threads, aye
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.
Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20266
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.
- The Modernist
- 2018 BCB Cup Champ!
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: 13 Apr 2014, 20:42
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Absolutely comparable.
No other artists take you on such an evolving journey and no others were so brilliant at combining a populist grasp of pop with outre blasts into the unknown.
No other artists take you on such an evolving journey and no others were so brilliant at combining a populist grasp of pop with outre blasts into the unknown.
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20266
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
G! Welcome back!
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.
- jimboo
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
- Location: taking a foxy kind of stand
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
DADDY-O wrote::o
G! Welcome back!
I would normally agree with you if he wasn't talking shite.
If I jerk- the handle jerk- the handle you'll thrill me and thrill me
- Goat Boy
- Bogarting the joint
- Posts: 32974
- Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
- Location: In the perfumed garden
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
He's not talking shite though is he? Bowies combination of songs and experimentation is matched only by the Fabs.
His journey throughout the 70s is certainly the most thrilling of that decade.
His journey throughout the 70s is certainly the most thrilling of that decade.
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.
Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism
- Goat Boy
- Bogarting the joint
- Posts: 32974
- Joined: 20 Mar 2007, 12:11
- Location: In the perfumed garden
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Also, welcome back, G!
Griff wrote:The notion that Jeremy Corbyn, a lifelong vocal proponent of antisemitism, would stand in front of an antisemitic mural and commend it is utterly preposterous.
Copehead wrote:a right wing cretin like Berger....bleating about racism
- clive gash
- wannabee enfant terrible
- Posts: 17219
- Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
- Location: down the rabbit hole
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
The Resurrection 2.0
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.
Diamond Dog wrote:...it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce...
...a multitude of innuendo and hearsay...
...I'm producing facts here...
- Moleskin
- Posts: 14607
- Joined: 18 Feb 2004, 12:38
- Location: We began to notice that we could be free, And we moved together to the West.
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
DADDY-O wrote:Is there anyone here who resists the idea that Bowie did for the 70s what the Fabs did for the 60s
Except that Bowie was never the commercial colossus, was he? ...and that was part of the charm of discovering his music. It was like joining a secret society. Even if 'most people' didn't know any Beatles songs apart from the hits, they were publicly owned in a way Bowie never was.
@hewsim
-the artist formerly known as comrade moleskin-
-the unforgettable waldo jeffers-
Jug Band Music
my own music
-the artist formerly known as comrade moleskin-
-the unforgettable waldo jeffers-
Jug Band Music
my own music
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7800
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
I'd have thought that Bowie was definitely a commercial colossus, but I'd like to think that the defining factor between Bowie and Beatles fans is that Bowie fans don't demand that everyone recognise that he was the greatest thing in the history of things.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
- naughty boy
- hounds people off the board
- Posts: 20266
- Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Oh, they do HERE!
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.
- jimboo
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 17:43
- Location: taking a foxy kind of stand
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Darkness_Fish wrote:I'd have thought that Bowie was definitely a commercial colossus, but I'd like to think that the defining factor between Bowie and Beatles fans is that Bowie fans don't demand that everyone recognise that he was the greatest thing in the history of things.
Just get with the fucking program .
If I jerk- the handle jerk- the handle you'll thrill me and thrill me
- Darkness_Fish
- Posts: 7800
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 09:58
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Sounds like my kind of program.
Like fast-moving clouds casting shadows against a hillside, the melody-loop shuddered with a sense of the sublime, the awful unknowable majesty of the world.
- clive gash
- wannabee enfant terrible
- Posts: 17219
- Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 00:32
- Location: down the rabbit hole
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
You have to do it in Beatles wigs
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.
Diamond Dog wrote:...it quite clearly hit the target with you and your nonce...
...a multitude of innuendo and hearsay...
...I'm producing facts here...
- toomanyhatz
- Power-mad king of the WCC
- Posts: 29993
- Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 00:01
- Location: Just east of where Charlie Parker went to do some relaxin'
Re: Bowie/Beatles comparisons
Darkness_Fish wrote:Bowie fans don't demand that everyone recognise that he was the greatest thing in the history of things.
DADDY-O wrote:Oh, they do HERE!
They certainly do. We have Beatle naysayers here, but the quickest way to be an outcast is to be a Bowie naysayer. Before your day, we had polls where we pitted Bowie against all and sundry, and he pretty much beat all comers. It got comical.
A person that I work with who is transgender took part in a choral performance of Ziggy and it occurs to me that rather than anything Beatle-connected, that is a defining characteristic of Bowie - that he was was a representative for all the outcasts, rebels and misfits. The reason why he owned the 70s so thoroughly is that he was so apart from the mainstream, but so huge because he was relateable for everyone who felt like they didn't fit in. And after the 'everybody get together' 60s nobody realized just how huge a group that was.
The fact that he's largely to blame for the 80s is only forgivable in light of that.
Footy wrote:
The Who / Jimi Hendrix Experience Saville Theatre, London Jan '67
. Got Jimi's autograph after the show and went on to see him several times that year
1959 1963 1965 1966 1974 1977 1978 1981 1988 2017* 2018 2020!! 2023?