BCB 130: The Who

Do talk back
Bent Fabric
Posts: 2969
Joined: 22 Jul 2014, 21:38

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Bent Fabric » 13 Nov 2014, 23:02

bobzilla77 wrote:It includes a searing Young Man Blues that may be the best I have ever heard.


SOLD!

User avatar
fange
100% fangetastic
Posts: 14171
Joined: 20 Jan 2010, 11:30
Location: 香港

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby fange » 14 Nov 2014, 06:03

A group that, due to time and place i guess, i've never really though of as one of my bands, but whose singles i've mostly loved my whole life.

Same great posts here, cheers to JSJ and all.
Jonny Spencer wrote:
fange wrote:I've got my quad pants on and i'm ready for some Cock.


By CHRIST you're a man after my own sideways sausage, Ange!

User avatar
Guy E
Posts: 13301
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:11
Location: Antalya, Turkey

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Guy E » 14 Nov 2014, 22:14

Rayge wrote:Interested to see that I am apparently the only one who experienced them in real time.

I was a fan in real time, but not from the very beginning. My sister's best friend's older brother had a band called The Puppets Recytal and they were huge fans of the Who. I saw them at sock-hops and that's where I first heard My Generation, Substitute and Happy Jack. My sister and I pooled our resources to buy The Who Sell Out and it was my favorite album for the next six months. The US Magic Bus album was next - the proverbial hodge-podge, but it was my first exposure to some great Who songs.

I also missed-out on seeing the group in their prime. They played at a teen club called The Jaguar in St. Charles, Illinois, a neighboring town. My sister and her boyfriend were planning to go and I talked them (and my parents) into letting 14-year old me tag along. But Jessie and Jimmy weren't getting along that night so we drove around for a couple of hours, me fuming in the back seat while they argued with each other in the front seat, occasionally pausing to tell me to shut up when I suggested we follow-through on the evening's plan. We never got to St. Charles and it remains a huge rock 'n roll regret.

Here's a photo from the gig:

Image
and a link to a reminiscence.
http://www.thewho.net/whotabs/gear/misc ... 80810.html

If I'd been a couple years older I would have seen quite a few bands in that quiet town along the Fox River:
Image

I did manage to see The Who at the Auditorium Theater a year or two later. They did Tommy and all that... a great concert.
["Minnie the Stalker"]The first time that we met I knew I was going to make him mine.

User avatar
Phenomenal Cat
death on four legs
Posts: 10464
Joined: 07 Sep 2004, 16:52
Location: Presently Shattering the Illusion of Integrity
Contact:

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Phenomenal Cat » 15 Nov 2014, 20:08

Guy E wrote:But Jessie and Jimmy weren't getting along that night so we drove around for a couple of hours, me fuming in the back seat while they argued with each other in the front seat, occasionally pausing to tell me to shut up when I suggested we follow-through on the evening's plan. We never got to St. Charles and it remains a huge rock 'n roll regret.


Fuckers!

I believe my friend John from Pezband (he lives down the street from me in Aurora) was at the gig.
kath wrote:i will make it my mission to nail you.


But somehow when you smile, I can brave bad weather.

Bent Fabric
Posts: 2969
Joined: 22 Jul 2014, 21:38

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Bent Fabric » 15 Nov 2014, 20:11

Guy E wrote:I did manage to see The Who at the Auditorium Theater a year or two later. They did Tommy and all that... a great concert.


I would say you are right to be embittered about the St. Charles debacle, but...having not been born yet when they played Tommy at Auditorium Theater, I'm approaching your booby prize from a place of major envy.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Postby Count Machuki » 16 Nov 2014, 04:31

Remember the St. Charles Incident!!

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Postby Count Machuki » 16 Nov 2014, 04:32

Oh um also, yes, the who.
They were pretty good, huh?

User avatar
Guy E
Posts: 13301
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:11
Location: Antalya, Turkey

Re:

Postby Guy E » 18 Nov 2014, 22:29

Count Machuki wrote:Remember the St. Charles Incident!!

For the record, I dearly love my sister. :D
["Minnie the Stalker"]The first time that we met I knew I was going to make him mine.

User avatar
Count Machuki
BCB Cup Champion 2013
Posts: 39534
Joined: 11 Jun 2005, 15:28
Location: HAIL, ATLANTA!

Re: Re:

Postby Count Machuki » 18 Nov 2014, 23:14

Guy E wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:Remember the St. Charles Incident!!

For the record, I dearly love my sister. :D


You must to still think of her as a sister.

;)
Let U be the set of all united sets, K be the set of the kids and D be the set of things divided.
Then it follows that ∀ k ∈ K: K ∈ U ⇒ k ∉ D

sloopjohnc
Posts: 63925
Joined: 03 Jun 2004, 20:12

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby sloopjohnc » 19 Nov 2014, 01:24

Bent Fabric wrote:
Kippy Pratt wrote:
Bent Fabric wrote: I cringe to hear the author HIMSELF discuss/describe his process, because he seems almost determined to spoil his own effect on others - I've said similar things about Neil Young's autobiography...what could Pete Townshend possibly know about his own work?!?!?


JESUS, that is a thread in itself. I read Who I Am once (just once?!?) and about halfway through I realized that old man Townshend was trying to crawl into the mind of young man Townshend and the results were just embarrassing. I'd love to hear Quaco's take on the book because after reading Townshend's attempts to intellectualize the importance of, say, "Glow Girl", I really did hope to get some of my initial blissful ignorance back. No wonder Lifehouse didn't get made. Come out and smell the fresh air, Pete. You've been up your arse far too long.

In case anyone is actually hoping to read the book, you'll get very little insight into Keith and John other than "they like to have a bit of fun; go out on the town; have a larf", and then about 400 pages of Pete dropping to his knees in hotel lobbies across the globe pledging his love and devotion to any long-legged eye candy who was a) younger than him and b) not his wife. His poor fucking wife is all could think throughout that book. He's kind of a schmuck.


Bravo!

That was more or less my response to his awful book - to the letter. He comes off like a spoilt child in so many ways - serial philandering and deep self indulgence, all the while with some beautiful woman desperately attempting to build him a home, support him emotionally and raise him a family, and...yeah, he comes off (even when telling the story about what a general shit he is/was/is planning to be) as some sort of victim.

I consider him one of the few genuine geniuses of the rock era, but I would also say that you or Quaco could tell me a great deal more about the man and his work than he could ever hope to.
And here I thought I was the only one who felt the same way about the book.
Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk!

User avatar
Guy E
Posts: 13301
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:11
Location: Antalya, Turkey

Re: Re:

Postby Guy E » 19 Nov 2014, 02:15

Count Machuki wrote:
Guy E wrote:
Count Machuki wrote:Remember the St. Charles Incident!!

For the record, I dearly love my sister. :D


You must to still think of her as a sister.

;)

I actually brought up the memory a couple years ago at Christmas in the hopes of having a good laugh and she had absolutely no recollection of the evening at all. :roll:
["Minnie the Stalker"]The first time that we met I knew I was going to make him mine.

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 16283
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby bobzilla77 » 30 Nov 2014, 06:08

Bent Fabric wrote:
bobzilla77 wrote:It includes a searing Young Man Blues that may be the best I have ever heard.


SOLD!






I'm pretty sure it si the one starting at 43 min that so impressed me - it still sounds like a scorcher to me. Pete is trying to take heads off rather than play some licks. Though honestly I'm listening to the one that starts at 1:02, and there's some real hellraising stuff in that one too as well as some some nice dynamics.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
naughty boy
hounds people off the board
Posts: 20266
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 23:21

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby naughty boy » 22 Jan 2018, 23:50

what a load of rubbish most WHO stuff is!
Matt 'interesting' Wilson wrote:So I went from looking at the "I'm a Man" riff, to showing how the rave up was popular for awhile.

User avatar
Quaco
F R double E
Posts: 47384
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:41

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Quaco » 23 Jan 2018, 00:30

Indeed!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

User avatar
fange
100% fangetastic
Posts: 14171
Joined: 20 Jan 2010, 11:30
Location: 香港

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby fange » 23 Jan 2018, 01:09

They're even worse than the Stones in that way!
Jonny Spencer wrote:
fange wrote:I've got my quad pants on and i'm ready for some Cock.


By CHRIST you're a man after my own sideways sausage, Ange!

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 16283
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby bobzilla77 » 23 Jan 2018, 03:55

Yeah what a bunch of boring old bollocks. Who's up for an Echo and the Bunnymen thread?
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
Bucolic Old Sir Henry
Trufficulteur
Posts: 3092
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 23:35
Location: Turn left at Tahiti, going west
Contact:

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Bucolic Old Sir Henry » 25 Jan 2018, 19:35

My parents bought me Pictures Of Lily for my 13th birthday. They had no idea.

Pip pip!
Limestone Hills/Hot Topic
"She had a snake for a pet, and an amulet,
And she was breeding a dwarf, but it wasn't done yet."

User avatar
Matt Wilson
Psychedelic Cowpunk
Posts: 32527
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 20:18
Location: Edge of a continent

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Matt Wilson » 25 Jan 2018, 19:37

If anything, we don't talk about The Who enough.

User avatar
bobzilla77
Posts: 16283
Joined: 23 Jun 2006, 02:56
Location: Dilute! Dilute! OK!

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby bobzilla77 » 25 Jan 2018, 22:53

They really were more fearless than anybody, weren't they? Lot of "firsts" from that band. Auto destruction, feedback on record (yes I know about I Feel Fine, allowing a little barely-audible hum at the opening is NOT what Pete did on Anyway Anyhow Anywhere), pop art fashion, rock opera, integration of synthesizers and minimalist patterns, into a heavy guitar band. Even things like, travelling with their own custom-built PA system, or starting your own record label to get out of bad contract terms, weren't done until they did it.

They were no bandwagon jumpers, them Who. They built cabins in the woods with their bare hands for many years.
Jimbo wrote:I guess I am over Graham Nash's politics. Hopelessly naive by the standards I've molded for myself these days.

User avatar
Quaco
F R double E
Posts: 47384
Joined: 16 Jul 2003, 19:41

Re: BCB 130: The Who

Postby Quaco » 26 Jan 2018, 18:46

Development of "quintaphonic" sound, precursor to 5.1.
Development of roundwound bass strings.
Development of Marshall stack.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Return to “Yakety Yak”